Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Там телеграмм

@tam_telegramm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

49subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001615391811
TypeChannel
Username@tam_telegramm
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 29 May 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/tam_telegramm

Growth

497 August 2026 — 49 subscribers10 August 2026 — 49 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48–50 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 12:1649no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:0849first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 May 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.7%
avg views ÷ 49 subscribers
Avg views / post
16.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026
Posts held20 (29 May 202226 July 2026)
Views total16
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
10
Videos
5
Links
15

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 39s
Average length
1m 13s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍266.7%
133.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2022 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Apr 2026, 13:29 UTC55 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍1

Signed Lana

14 Aug 2025, 05:36 UTC281 viewsread 10 August 2026

Про МАХу Читатели просят рассказать, что делать со всплеском ретивости регионального начальства, загоняющего всех в МАХу, и что это вообще за зверь такой. Давайте разбираться. Что мы имеем: 1️⃣ Базовые материалы Можно ознакомиться самостоятельно: 1️⃣ 156-ФЗ от 24.06.2025 «О многофункциональном сервисе обмена информацией…», в котором указаны права и фактические обязанности граждан при полной безответственности Махи

Signed Lana

2 Jun 2025, 13:05 UTC291 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Представьте ситуацию: вам срочно нужна наличка, ближайший банкомат далеко, а банк уже закрыт. Есть решение — воспользоваться «кэшаутом». Что это такое? Кэшаут — это возможность снимать деньги с карты в кассе магазина, аптеки, АЗС и других торговых точек во время оплаты. Причем сумма покупки может быть любая, а вот сумма снятия должна быть кратна 100 рублям и не превышать 5 тыс. рублей за одну операцию. По рекомендац

1👍1

Signed Lana

12 Feb 2025, 08:23 UTC273 viewsread 10 August 2026

Теперь можно через госуслуги писать ЛЮБОМУ владельцу авто через Госуслуги — новая вкладка позволяет ЛИЧНО обратиться к водителю в чате. Так куда проще сообщить гению парковки, что его машина мешает проезду или предупредить об эвакуаторе. • Жмем «Услуги» → «Транспорт и права». • Далее «Сообщить о проблеме владельцу транспортного средства».

Signed Lana

17 Nov 2024, 04:40 UTC288 viewsread 10 August 2026

Неожиданные зачисления на карту — это, конечно, приятно. Но если деньги поступают от незнакомца, следует насторожиться, но не паниковать. Рассказываем, как действовать в такой ситуации: 1️⃣ Не возвращайте деньги самостоятельно. Такой перевод может оказаться этапом мошеннической схемы. После с вами может связаться человек и сообщить, что ошибся в реквизитах, а дальше попросить вернуть деньги. Но по другому номеру ка

Signed Lana

14 Nov 2024, 10:43 UTC210 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @novosti_chelyabPhoto

Мошенники начали посылать своим жертвам букеты цветов Жителей Челябинска предупреджают о новом способе мошенничества. Аферисты теперь притворяются курьерами, доставляющими цветы. Схема такова: к человеку стучится в дверь незнакомец с букетом или подарком. Одаренный доволен, но недоумевает: что за тайный доброжелатель прислал цветы? А аферист просит продиктовать код из смс-ки, якобы для подтверждения благополучной до

Signed Lana

25 Mar 2024, 12:47 UTC224 viewsread 10 August 2026

https://www.rbc.ru/life/news/66011e799a794701e61ae472 Мошенники начали использовать новую схему для взлома «Госуслуг»

Signed Lana

5 Jun 2023, 17:06 UTC243 viewsread 10 August 2026

https://teletype.in/@metafinansy/SanctionApps

Signed Lana

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tam_telegramm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Там телеграмм” (@tam_telegramm), 49 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tam_telegramm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.