Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Талламхо

Channel

Талламхо

@tallamho1445

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

409subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002030709913
TypeChannel
Username@tallamho1445
Created12 December 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tallamho1445

Growth

402409405.57 August 2026 — 403 subscribers7 August 2026 — 402 subscribers8 August 2026 — 402 subscribers16 August 2026 — 409 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 9 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 401–410 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 04:18409+7
8 Aug 2026, 05:48402no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:54402-1
7 Aug 2026, 12:49403first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41.9%
avg views ÷ 409 subscribers
Avg views / post
171
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (12 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,228
Reactions total28
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 10s
Average length
2m 10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

46 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 60484793620790031371328.3%
custom 58595237490652656681226.1%
custom 60511346440053820651226.1%
custom 6048447321622974716613.0%
custom 605099475262557927836.52%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC65 viewsread 8 August 2026

Хаттар: Ламазехь фатихьат доьшуш куьйгаш мича дахка деза? Жоп: Оцу хаттарх лаьцна Делан элчанера (Делера къинхетам а, маршалла а хуьлда цунна) сахьихь долуш, куьйгашна билггал йолу меттиг билгалъяьккхина деан хIумма дац. Хьайна лаахь куьйгаш цIонган лакха, буха, накхан тӀе дахка, цхьа а башхалла яц цуьнан. АллахӀ дика хууш ву. 📖 Талламхо | ТIе вазло ✈️

5 Aug 2026, 22:03 UTC99 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @serlo12Photo

„Ма тамшийна х|ум дукх из Акъида, хьуна маьлла уллерниг гена вокх цо, шун ойла цхьан т|аьхь яцахь, хьуна мял генарниг улле вокх цо, шун ойла цхьан т|аьхь йалахь. Ма хаз букх из Аллах|ан дуьхьа бол безам."

custom 60511346440053820655

4 Aug 2026, 17:45 UTC143 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Хаттар: Каратэхь а, дзюдохь а ковер тIе ваьлча хенахь еш йолу наклон, приветствие йаьш, бусалба динехь хьарам дуй? Жоп: И наклон еккъа цхьа лерам хилар, кхерамазалла гайтар, тешам хилар билгало санна еш ю, оцу спортехь Ӏадатехь ду иза, динца цхьа а зӀе йолуш хIума дац.Иза хьарам долуш хӀумма а дац цигахь, цуьнца цхьаьна хьарам агIор дог ойла ца хилар ду коьртаниг, масала АллахIан баьн яла йиш йоцу сийлал луш, йа Ӏиб

custom 60484793620790031374custom 60484473216229747162custom 58595237490652656681

4 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC142 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сайна 300 спартанцаш эцна кхи дIа новкъа доьвра ду тхо, хIинцалца санна. Бакъдерг цкъа а доккхачу тобанехь ца хуьлу…))

custom 60509947526255792783custom 60484793620790031371

4 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTC141 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

…нагахь санна хьуна хIокху агIон тIехь пайда гахь. Амма хьайна цагахь, оьшуш дац хьуна, эшшане а.)

custom 60484473216229747162

4 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC308 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

▪️ Яржае хIара вайна агIо 📖 Талламхо | ТIе вазло ✈️

custom 60484793620790031372custom 58595237490652656681custom 60511346440053820651

2 Aug 2026, 10:49 UTC168 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ассаламу 1алайкум Ваша ,на пример тахан хаза де ду ара цавалар хьарам ду олакх цхьа болчара ишта мегаш дуй и? ва Iалайкум ас-саламу ва рохьматуЛлохIи ва баракатухIу Динан агIор хьарам ду бохучу маьIнехь олуш дац иза. Еккъа цхьа эмоциональный усиление ю, цхьана гӀуллакхан инзаре хилар чӀагӀдеш. АллахӀ дика хууш ву. 📖 Талламхо | ТIе вазло ✈️

custom 60484793620790031371

25 Jul 2026, 21:04 UTC235 viewsread 8 August 2026

#4_ГIИЙЛА ХЬАДИС «Аьшпаш кхаа хьолехь бен ца мега: майрачунна а, зудчунна а юкъахь, тӀамехь, маслаӀат дан Ӏалашонца». ХIорша пайхамаран ◽️ дешнаш дац, табиӀий Ибн ШихIаб аз-ЗухIрин дешнаш ду. Ибн ШихӀаб аз-ЗухIрин дукхахболу уггаре а уллера болчу дешархоша, шайна юкъахь Малик ибн Анас а, Суфьян ибн Ӏуйайна а, МаӀмар ибн Рашид а, кхиберш а болуш, и дешнаш Ибн ШихIаб аз-ЗухIрис аьлла дийцина цара. Элчанан ◽️ хьадис

24 Jul 2026, 18:31 UTC191 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

СУДЖУДЕ МУХА ВАХА ВЕЗА? ЦКЪА ХЬАЛХА КУЬЙГАШ ОХЬА ДАХКА ДЕЗА ЙА ГОЛАШ? Суджуде воьдуш хьалха куьйгаш дахка деза, я голаш йахка еза бохуш долу хьадисаш сахьихь дац. Иштта эмкал санна охьавижа ца веза суджуде воьдуш бохуш долу хьадисаш а дац сахьихь. Цу хаттарехь Пайхамарера (АллахӀера салам-маршалла хуьлда цунна) сахьихь долуш хӀума дац, «иштта я вуьштта дан деза» аьлла тӀедожийна. Оцу хьокъехь деана долу хьадисаш я

custom 60511346440053820651

24 Jul 2026, 07:29 UTC178 viewsread 8 August 2026

ДЕЛАН ЭЛЧА ДӀАКЪАЬСТИНА БУСУЛБАЧУ НАХАХ, МУШРИКАШНА ЮККЪЕХЬ БЕХАШ БОЛУ? أنا بريءٌ من كلِّ مسلمٍ يقيمُ بين أظهرِ المشركين. «Со дӀакъаьстина ву (цIена ву) муьлххачу а бусулба стагах, мушрикашна юккъехь вехаш волу». (Абу Дауд 2645, Имам Тирмизи 1604.) Дуккха нахан моьтту, Делан элча ﷺ дӀакъаьстин муьлххачу а бусулба стагах, нагахь иза бусулба боцучу махкахь вехаш валахь. И кхетам сакхт долуш бу. Цкъа делахь, хьадис

21 Jul 2026, 09:12 UTC184 viewsread 8 August 2026

#3_ГIИЙЛА ХЬАДИС الخوارجُ كِلابُ النَّارِ «Хавариджаш — цIеран (жоьжахатин) жIаьлеш ду» аьлла долу хьадис — дIатеттина (мункар) ду! Цуьнан массо а зIе Абу ГIóлибан тIе хьалайоьду, а иза — хьадисашкахь дIатеттина ву (лоруш вац). Иштта гӀийла ду оцу хьадисан кхидолу некъаш а, Абу ГӀóлибехула доцуриш а. Уьш я ца девзаш (маджхIул) ду, я доьхна ду, я кхин а гӀийла нах бу шайна чохь. Цундела Абу-ГӀалибан хьадис кхечу не

20 Jul 2026, 20:18 UTC160 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Кому не лень поделитесь этой ссылкой: https://t.me/+MGl5CcDlo0kxNDJi ❗️Если для вас это безопасно.

custom 58595237490652656681custom 60484793620790031371

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tallamho1445. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 688,223 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Талламхо” (@tallamho1445), 409 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tallamho1445.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.