Video, posted without a caption
❤1

Channel
@talksimply
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
620subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001220464597 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @talksimply |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/talksimply |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 620 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:42 | 625 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:29 | 627 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 628 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
155 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 68 | 43.9% | |
| ⚡ | 28 | 18.1% | |
| 🔥 | 25 | 16.1% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 6.45% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 3.87% | |
| custom 5357334118159883232 | 5 | 3.23% | |
| custom 5415839883493123158 | 5 | 3.23% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 2.58% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 2.58% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 155 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @talksimply. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Video, posted without a caption
❤1
1. Отношения начинаются с контакта. 👇👇👇 2. Потом контакт постепенно теряется. 👇👇 3. Появляются первые сигналы эмоционального отдаления. 👇 4. Пара входит в кризис. 👇 5. Наступает точка выбора. 👇👇 6. Либо люди расходятся. 👇👇👇 7. Либо учатся строить зрелую близость.
🔥1
Posted without readable text
❤5⚡2
Video message, posted without a caption
❤7
Отсутствие благодарности не так страшно , как отсутствие отклика на просьбу поменять поведение , которое доставляет тебе боль
⚡5
Полгода назад мы начали путь, который стал особенным не только для этой семьи, но и для меня.🔥 Это была моя первая пара в формате семейного сопровождения. Тогда не было готовых кейсов, отзывов или подтверждений, что именно такой формат работает. Была только моя вера в то, что отношениям нужно не одно решение, а время, пространство и человек, который поможет пройти этот путь рядом. На днях мы записали наше второе ин…
❤6⚡2👏1
Самое интересное, что мои видео чаще комментируют мужчины, чем женщины! И в комментариях рождаются темы для новых видео - это здорово! скорее смотрите📹 Развод начинается не в ЗАГСе. Он начинается в тот момент, когда человек перестаёт чувствовать, что он важен. https://youtu.be/eIKLNY9sQNQ?si=Xp4yQ9S_waRbT_v-
❤7⚡2🔥1
🔥Почему мужчина перестает давать? Часто женщины говорят: Раньше он был внимательным. Дарил цветы. Помогал. Старался. А потом как будто перестал. Кажется, что мужчина просто изменился. Но давайте посмотрим глубже. Мужчина редко перестает отдавать в один день. Чаще всего он постепенно перестает чувствовать, что его вклад кому-то нужен. У каждого человека есть своя картина любви. И очень многие мужчины приходят в отн…
👍6❤3🔥2
Как отношения с отцом влияют на отношения с мужчиной? «Опять всё сводят к папе…» Честно? Не всё. Но именно отношения с отцом часто становятся первым опытом того, как девочка чувствует себя рядом с мужчиной. И этот опыт незаметно переходит во взрослую жизнь. Вот три самых распространенных сценария. 1️⃣. Если рядом с папой не было чувства безопасности, женщине становится трудно доверять мужчине. Она всё контролируе…
🔥7🥰4❤3
🔥Почему женщина перестает просить? Обычно кажется, что женщина уходит из отношений, потому что разлюбила. Но очень часто всё начинается намного раньше. С того момента, когда она перестает просить. Почему? Потому что многие из нас с детства учились не просить. Сама справишься. Не жалуйся. Не будь слабой. В этом мире выживают сильные. И девочка делает вывод: Если мне нужна помощь — значит, со мной что-то не так. По…
❤8⚡3🔥1
... Новый уровень в моей деятельности - встречайте. Со звуком.
❤9🔥7custom 54158398834931231584
Отец тиран... Был у Майкла Джексона. Недавно посмотрела фильм 'Майкл". Не ожидала, что у него был такой суровый меркантильный отец. Очень ярко показано, как он держал всех в узде, ради семейного подряда. Тк если бы и дальше был бы бенд братьев, то отец чувствовал бы себя значимым и реализованным. Тут эго, конечно, сильно педалировало историю. И вместе с этим понятно, почему Майкла тянуло к детям и сам он был каким…
⚡5🔥2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @talksimply. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дом внутри” (@talksimply), 620 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/talksimply.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.