From past foundations to futuristic innovations—ZYNTAX DEV is officially BACK! 🚀⚡ We've evolved, upgraded, and are ready to engineer your next big digital experience. Whether you need a high-performance web application, a robust system, or premium UI/UX design, we bring your vision to life with cutting-edge code and endless possibilities. Let's build the future together. 🌐 🛠️ Our Expertise: • Web & System Develo…

Channel
Tech With ixAAr💻✨
@talk_with_ixaar
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
165subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001659336874 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @talk_with_ixaar |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/talk_with_ixaar |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 165 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 166 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 166 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 5 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 10m 24s
- Average length
- 5m 12s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
31 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 38.7% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 32.3% | |
| 😢 | 8 | 25.8% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 3.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 January 2025 to 4 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 3
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 3
- of 17 we hold a reading for · 18%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @talk_with_ixaar. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 January 2025 to 4 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Tech With ixAAr💻✨ pinned Deleted message
🤖 WhatsApp Status Automation Bot A Node.js-based WhatsApp automation system built using Baileys, featuring: ✔ Automatic status viewing ✔ Emoji reactions & optional replies ✔ Anti-ban protection logic ✔ Real-time web dashboard ✔ Status media downloader Designed with scalability and clean code in mind. Ideal for portfolio showcase and automation demos. 🔗 GitHub repo: https://github.com/Dev-ixAAr/whatsapp-status-bot…
🎬 Excited to share my latest project: Cinematic Subtitle Translator! Ever noticed how subtitle translations feel robotic and lose the emotion of the original dialogue? I built a solution! 🚀 🎯 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲𝘀 𝗶𝘁 𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁? Unlike basic translators, this tool actually UNDERSTANDS the movie scene: 💥 Action scenes → Urgent, punchy translations 💕 Romance scenes → Soft, tender expressions 😄 Comedy scenes → Natural, funny di…
🔥2
ලෝකේ පලවෙනි OS එක 😱 https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1YN4WxSRhw/ like & comment
ලොකේ පලවෙනි smartphone එක https://www.facebook.com/share/1AtD1PvRzc/ Like & comment
හොඳම උපදෙස තමයි, බය නැතුව experiment කරන එක. අලුතින් test repository එකක් හදාගෙන, ඒකේ කැමති command එකක් ගහලා බලන්න. මොකක්හරි අවුලක් උනොත්, git reflog වගේ commands වලින් ගොඩ එන්න පුළුවන්. git status කියන command එක නිතරම use කරන්න, ඔයා ඉන්න තැන ගැන clear idea එකක් ගන්න. Commands මතක තියාගන්නවට වඩා, ඒවගෙන් වෙන්නේ මොකක්ද, ඒ දේ කරන්නේ ඇයි කියන "why" එක තේරුම් ගන්න. පුළුවන් නම් පොඩි open-source project එකකට contribute කර…
Git සහ GitHub: Software ලෝකයේ නැතුවම බැරි යාලුවෝ දෙන්නා! Software development field එකට අලුතින් එන කෙනෙක්ට වගේම, field එකේ දැනටමත් ඉන්න කෙනෙක්ටත් Git සහ GitHub කියන්නේ හරියට දකුණු අත වගේ. මේ ගැන තියෙන ප්රශ්න, පටලැවිලි ගොඩයි අද වෙද්දී Git සහ GitHub නැතුවම බැරි ඇයි? අද වෙද්දි software development වල collaboration සහ automation කියන දේවල් උපරිමයටම යන කාලයක්. මෙතනදී Git කියන්නේ version control වල standard එක. ඒ කියන්නේ,…
මේක ටිකක් advanced topic එකක්, ඒත් ගොඩක් වැදගත්. git merge කියන්නේ ඔයාගේ feature branch එකේ history එක, main branch එකට එකතු කරද්දී අලුත් "merge commit" එකක් හදන එක. මේකෙන් branch history එක ඒ විදියටම ආරක්ෂා වෙනවා. git rebase කියන්නේ ඔයාගේ feature branch එකේ commits ටික අරගෙන, main branch එකේ අලුත්ම commit එක උඩින් එකින් එක තියලා, history එක linear (කෙලින්) කරන එක. මේකෙන් commit history එක ගොඩක් clean වෙනවා. Team pro…
Photo, posted without a caption
මං මගේ අවසාන project එක විදියට MP4 File MP3 File විදියට Convert කරන App එකක් හදලා ඉවර වෙලා Dev ixAAr කියන නම සදහටම අයින් කරනවා. අයේ මං Coding වත් Graphic Design වත් කිසිම tech දෙයක් වත් දාන්නේ නැ. කියලා දෙන්නෙත් නැ! Chapter Ending Soon........
😢4😁1
🚀 Sri Lanka’s First AI-Powered Tech Channel! අලුත්ම tech update දැන ගන්න 𝑾𝒂𝒚 𝑶𝒇 𝑴𝒂𝒏𝒅𝒐 channel එකට join වෙන්න, channel එකේ ඔක්කොම writing and posting වෙන්නේ AI වලින් ✔️ Daily tech news & insights ✔️ Weekly recaps ✔️ 100% AI-written & automated ✔️ weekend එකේ සතියේ වුණ දෙවල් ගැන කතා කරනවා 🔗 Follow now: t.me/wayofmando Join us and experience the future of AI-powered content today! ⭐
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @talk_with_ixaar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 809,323 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tech With ixAAr💻✨” (@talk_with_ixaar), 165 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/talk_with_ixaar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.