Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

closed.

@talionlife

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

45subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001730736273
TypeChannel
Username@talionlife
Description໒ welcome. ╭╭── ──── ╌╌╌ ─ ╮ ╎╎ 4ever young. West.🕊️ ╎╎ инɸᴏ ᴋᴀнᴀᴧ:: @lonestalion ╰╯ — Помните! Ваша личность это.. — Бу, Юн.) @marnovlife
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/talionlife

Growth

4511 Aug 2026, 23:17 — 45 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 23:30 — 45 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 23:1711 Aug 2026, 23:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 44–46 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 23:3045no change
11 Aug 2026, 23:1745first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 14 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,760
Videos
72
Links
976

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

939 reactions across 13 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💔43646.4%
🕊18619.8%
😭15816.8%
😢505.32%
434.58%
🥰161.70%
💘151.60%
🤝121.28%
🙏60.639%
💋50.532%
custom 523100895091204238840.426%
👍20.213%
10.106%
❤‍🔥10.106%
🍌10.106%
😨10.106%
😱10.106%
🤬10.106%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 939reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 14 October 2024 to 2 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 17 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @talionlife. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 October 2024 to 2 May 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 May 2025, 10:40 UTC302 views17 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

😢9💔6💋1😱1

28 Dec 2024, 15:02 UTC619 views5 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @GlowshomePhoto

⬜️В рпкм любят : на чьей стороне правда? 🤩🤩🤩 Раз в год и палка стреляет, и Миру с Лотом что-то выкатывают. В рпкм любят – канал, который ввел в заблуждение немалое количество человек. Мы – люди, которых попросили помочь с написанием статьи, а кто мы такие, чтобы отказывать?🤫 никто 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 –Первая часть статьи. –Вторая часть статьи. –Канал со скринами. !! Важно: для более удоб

4😨1

Signed 女 、𝓜𝘰𝗋 ∶ 𝐂 ゛

19 Nov 2024, 06:52 UTC≈1,290 views114 reactions6 Starsread 11 August 2026

к нашему пребольшому сожалению, вся информация, указанная в информационном канале телеграмм, оказалась не фейком. вывод сделан ближе к утру, поскольку за ночь успел более-менее оклематься и на утро ознакомиться со всеми новостными каналами сети, чтоб постараться найти единственный канал, где напишут «ночь в Сумах прошла ужасно, но обошлось без жертв. дети поддались госпитализации», но чуда не произошло. да, сложно.

💔61🕊3121🍌1

Signed 女 、𝓜𝘰𝗋 ∶ 𝐂 ゛

18 Nov 2024, 17:09 UTC≈1,280 views83 reactionsread 11 August 2026

наверное, скорее всего, как администратору(хоть и по активу) мне тоже надо сказать что-то. я впервые сталкиваюсь с подобной ситуацией, и так же само как Лот нахожусь максимально в шоковом состоянии. Вэст был прекрасным товарищем, с ним можно было поговорить абсолютно на все темы, все разговоры мог поддержать, мне очень - очень жаль что это произошло, и до последнего буду надеяться что это просто глупая ошибка. больше

😭34💔26🕊22💋1

18 Nov 2024, 16:58 UTC≈1,130 views105 reactionsread 11 August 2026

знаете, мне аж стыдно видеть, что здесь растет количество подписчиков. складывается впечатление для себя же, что весь этот спектакль - только ради эффектной рекламы через репосты и сожаления. головой соображаю, что это всё делается только как поддержка, но пока что я слишком сентиментальный, чтоб больше отдавать управление мозгу, а не чувствам. я вижу много незнакомых и знакомых лиц в комментариях, которые всячески п

💔53🕊30💘14🙏61💋1

18 Nov 2024, 16:37 UTCviews —

closed. pinned «знаете, у меня никогда не дрожат руки при написании публицистичных текстов. отписывая очередное обсуждение, моя рука не дрогнула, хотя подсознательно я осознавал, что моё слово повлияет на позицию читателя не в самую добрую сторону; заканчивая печатать последний…»

18 Nov 2024, 16:36 UTC≈1,100 views91 reactionsread 11 August 2026

новость о потере будет висеть здесь в закрепе. Приват потерял достойную поддержку в виде Вэста. милашик бы гордился тем, что Приват - проект, которым он безумно восхищался, будет помнить его долго и вспоминать хорошим словом.

💔53🥰16🕊11🤝11

18 Nov 2024, 16:34 UTC≈1,230 views108 reactionsread 11 August 2026

спасибо всем, кто приносит свои искренние соболезнования и веру в лучшее!! все мы надеемся, что с Вэстом всё хорошо. очень приятно, что даже те, кто в душе не знает Вэста, говорит искренние слова поддержки. до сих пор слезятся глаза и дрожит голос, когда вижу собственный пост. совсем не верится, что это та реальность, в которой я живу. будто бы это просто какой-то кошмар, который через мгновение закончится, но придет

💔52🕊29😭25💋1🤝1

18 Nov 2024, 16:02 UTC≈11,600 views358 reactions3 Starsread 11 August 2026

знаете, у меня никогда не дрожат руки при написании публицистичных текстов. отписывая очередное обсуждение, моя рука не дрогнула, хотя подсознательно я осознавал, что моё слово повлияет на позицию читателя не в самую добрую сторону; заканчивая печатать последний абзац в статье, мои пальцы уверенно стучали по клавиатуре, чтоб каждый смог поучаствовать эмоции автора и поддаться им. но что теперь? я не могу подобрать и

💔168😭99😢41🕊3610👍2💋1💘1

15 Nov 2024, 18:24 UTC≈1,330 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

⥃ 𝖺𝙫𝙤𝟭𝖽 𝗍𝗵𝙚 𝘃𝙤𝟣𝙙 . ‼️ 𝖱𝗘𝗦𝖴𝙇𝖳𝙎 𝗙𝖮𝙍 ⬎ 🏳🏳🏳 𝐏𝐫𝐢𝐯𝐚𝐭, вы . . . 𝟭𝟬𝟮 (𝗉𝗋𝙤𝗰𝗲𝗌𝗌𝟣𝙣𝙜) _ идет обработка. благодарим за участие и извиняемся, если результат вас не устроил. 🏳🏳🏳🏳 🏳 . . . ⟲ 𝙧𝗲𝗌𝗍𝗮𝙧𝙩 , 𝗉𝙡𝙚𝗮𝗌𝖾 .

❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @talionlife. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 313,236 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“closed.” (@talionlife), 45 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/talionlife.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.