Channel
@talibano123
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
39subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001625175681 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @talibano123 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 5 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 5 times, most recently 13 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/talibano123 |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:24 | 39 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 40 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 41 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 41 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 5 February 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 March 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
105 reactions across 9 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 20 | 19.0% | |
| 🤬 | 18 | 17.1% | |
| 😢 | 14 | 13.3% | |
| ☃ | 13 | 12.4% | |
| 🤣 | 11 | 10.5% | |
| 💩 | 10 | 9.52% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 9.52% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 5.71% | |
| 🥱 | 2 | 1.90% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.952% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 5 February 2023 to 9 March 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🕌Это голубая мечеть в мазари шарифе. Мовзолей ширка и куфра!!! По разным пустякам тут якобы захоронен Али ибн абу талиб... Каждый день сотни людей, в том числе и сами талибы, посещают эту могилу чтоб решить свои проблемы. Люди просят у могилы о помощи и поддержке в своих делах... Так если это не ширк.. то, что тогда ширк для вас?? ⛔️ТАЛИБАН⛔️
👍13💩6❤2🤣2🥱1
⛔️Осторожно полный бред!!! 🗣Как заявляет один Талибский шейх на своей хутбе для старейшен разные племен: аЛлах создал пуштунов для того чтоб они защищали весь мир.. 🤥И добавил еще : посланник аЛлаха С.А.В говорил что все для ислама делают пуштунцы а остальные люди просто жрут, и живут... Неужели они не разумеют? Насколько же они без мозглые люди... Так он наводит ложь на аЛлаха и на его посланника сразу... ⛔…
🤬12💩2👍1🤣1🥱1
😅😅😅😅 Дрифт по Талибский 👩👦Мамкин форсажист хотел показать мастер класс людям. Но что то пошло не так....🤭 Конечно пойдет ни так.... Это же тебе не ищяк...🙄 Да и ты не вин дизель😅😅😅 ⛔️ТАЛИБАН⛔️
🤣8😁2👍1💩1😢1
👹Это те люди которые говорят что они установили справидивость. Такую же, какую при правлении Умара ибн аль хаттаба он устонавил... 🗡⚔Наверное если бы увидел их Умар, то скорее отрубил бы им головы... ⛔️ТАЛИБАН⛔️
🤬6👍1💩1
😢😢😢😢😢😢 Коротко о том... как проходит детства в Афганистане.. ⛔️ТАЛИБАН⛔️
😢13👍2
🤝Когда другие так называемые муджахиды в истории Афганистана, устанавливали дипломатические связи, и выравнивали свои политические отношени с кафирами то все Талибы кричали 🗣 что они теперь пали в куфр 🙀 А когда сами талибы начали заниматься тем же самым. Желая достичь признании мирового сообщества то это исламская политика? 🤦♂🤦♂ 🧠Безумия новых псов запада🦮🐕🦺🦮🐕🦺🦮 ⛔️ТАЛИБАН⛔️
❤4
🌧🌨🌨 Коротко, о том как прошли морозы этой зимой в Афганистане.🌏 ⛔️ТАЛИБАН⛔️
☃13🌚1
🇺🇸Зильмай халильзат Один из самых известных политиков и очень надежная собака США... говорит что ИГ это общий враг Талибана и всего мира... То есть ИГ это наш общий враг с талибами против которого мы должны бороться вместе.... ⛔️ТАЛИБАН⛔️
😁4
👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆 🇪🇬 Кто теперь новый лидер "Аль-Каиды", и где он скрывается? Есть версия что именно один из этих людей о которых мы уже говорили, теперь стал главой аль каиды!! Вот теперь ваши амиры ребята... рРжЖу немогу 😅😅😅 ⛔️ТАЛИБАН⛔️
😁4👍2
👮♀👮♀👮♀👮♀👮👮👮👮👮👮👮♂ Нууу ??? И чем же они отличаются от солдат всех остальных кафирских армии? А ты до сих пор веришь что они муджахиды....! ⛔️ТАЛИБАН⛔️
⛔️Осторожно Харам⛔️ Как бы талибы не кричали во весь голос, что типа они установили шариат. Все видят только обратное... Базары переполнены наркотой, сигаретами, и насваром. И никого запрета на это все.. может это тоже часть талибского шариата? ⛔️ТАЛИБАН⛔️
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @talibano123. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⛔ТАЛИБАН⛔” (@talibano123), 39 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/talibano123.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.