Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 65 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 350–375 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Oct 2026, 15:58
372
+8
30 Sept 2026, 13:41
364
+11
9 Sept 2026, 03:55
353
-4
31 Aug 2026, 15:04
357
-1
24 Aug 2026, 18:35
358
-1
16 Aug 2026, 03:08
359
+4
8 Aug 2026, 06:46
355
no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:45
355
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 15 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 32s
Average length
1m 32s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
21 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
9
42.9%
🤣
8
38.1%
😁
4
19.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Em bán tool, bán code mà ảnh đăng đ thấy code thấy tool là do e đ biết code thì biết chỗ code nào để flex :)) Tất cả tool, code e đều do AI làm ra hết, nó làm ra kết quả em mới lấy cái đó đem đăng lên kênh. Mọi ảnh em đăng lên kênh tức là e đang quảng cáo để bán code tạo ra nó, các sếp cứ thoải mái hỏi em sẽ trả lời hết và đương nhiên sẽ có demo cho tool cho code nếu cần chứ các sếp ko phải mua tool qua bức ảnh e quả…
profile lq lấy cái gì cũng được mà còn đúng cái tạo luồng login tcp vào game thì chưa làm được =))
*trong hình là: cái trang profile với cái trang thông tin tướng
Vẫn là em trộm code nhanh nhất mảng garena. API check rank này đúng khoai thật các sếp.
Mấy thằng cứ nói móc tao làm gì, tao sắp trộm được api chung sức rồi tại cái rank lần này là vào tới trong game nên chung sức thêm tí nữa là được. Còn mấy thằng nói móc được cái mồm, cái mồm đè tem TCP 💗
- Như này là hạn chế tối đa acc bị sót vì ERROR_CAPTCHA. Theo như em thấy có sieucap5s là check có tích hợp giải captcha luôn nên kết quả bên đó rất chuẩn.
- Em thấy dạo này ip pool của topproxy bị spam garena khá nát rồi. Xoay phải ip bẩn thì 1ph acc check ra full sai. Tỉ lệ ip bẩn của topproxy cũng nhiều đó, sốp nào chạy bằng topproxy thì cân nhắc.
Các web của em từ giờ sẽ thanh toán bằng crypto (thêm 3% phí tính theo giá trị đơn). Vẫn có thể thanh toán bằng ngân hàng thành crypto thông qua các bên trung gian như muabanpm.com. Dự kiến sẽ hoạt động lại trong 1 tuần nữa.
TOOL CHECK TẠI ĐÂY
Hiện tại có FO4 và ROV. Mấy game khác chờ thêm, rút ngắn bằng cách donate cũng được :)). Các sếp cũng đừng kêu AI dịch ngược, tại này em nối api thôi.
Nhiều sếp hỏi sao mấy web của em đều làm kiểu key chứ không làm đăng nhập tài khoản cho dễ quản lý. Lí do là nó phức tạp quá em dùng AI ko làm được 🤡
😁3
Signed streptococcus
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @talec_area. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Area of Talec” (@talec_area), 372 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/talec_area.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
