Channel
@talaevdanil
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
135subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004472909380 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @talaevdanil |
| Created | 16 June 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/talaevdanil |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 135 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 133 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:49 | 133 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (16 June 2026 – 20 July 2026) |
| Views total | 178 |
| Reactions total | 28 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 00:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
254 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 97 | 38.2% | |
| 🔥 | 60 | 23.6% | |
| 👍 | 58 | 22.8% | |
| 👏 | 36 | 14.2% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.787% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.394% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 254reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Большая часть работы всегда остается за кадром Когда только начинаешь работать на проекте, кажется, что каждое усилие должно приводить к какому-то заметному эффекту Сделал задачу — получил результат, запустил проект — увидел изменения, но на практике все работает не так гладко Большая часть времени уходит на встречи, согласования, документы, обсуждения, перепроверки и десятки мелких задач, которые сами по себе нич…
❤14👍8👏5🔥1
Карьеру за вас никто не построит За несколько лет работы в корпорации я пересмотрел свое отношение к карьерному росту. В начале пути мне казалось, что все довольно логично: хорошо работаешь, показываешь результат, руководитель это замечает и в какой-то момент предлагает повышение На практике все оказалось немного по-другому Со временем я понял, что у руководителей хватает своих задач. Встречи, проекты, дедлайны, д…
👏10❤9🔥4👍2
Хорошего продакта отличает не количество изученных фреймворков Последнее время все чаще замечаю одну тенденцию: многие пытаются попасть в продуктовый менеджмент через изучение инструментов. На собеседованиях обсуждают методологии, метрики, подходы к приоритизации, задают вопросы про то, как человек будет развивать продукт. Складывается ощущение, что если выучить правильные термины, то автоматически станешь хорошим п…
🔥18❤11👍7👏4
Сложность проекта редко бывает в технологиях Несколько лет назад мы получили задачу выходить на внешний рынок. Одним из первых крупных коммерческих проектов стало внедрение системы для крупной золотодобывающей компании Работа началась задолго до самого внедрения. Только согласование договора заняло три с половиной месяца. Бесконечные правки, встречи, согласования — классическая история для большого корпоративного п…
👍15❤5👏5🔥2
За последние годы я перестал требовать от команды две вещи. И продуктивность от этого только выросла Первая вещь — приходить на работу ровно к началу рабочего дня и уходить только после его окончания. Когда я только стал руководителем, мне казалось, что дисциплина начинается именно с этого. Если человек сидит в офисе до вечера, значит работает. Если уходит раньше — значит недостаточно вовлечен в работу. Со временем …
❤19👍8🔥8👌1👏1
На выходных побывал на FAM Fest 🚗 Это ежегодная встреча владельцев и любителей BMW. Много интересных автомобилей, общение, музыка, конкурсы и просто возможность провести день среди людей, которых объединяет общее хобби Я сам недавно стал владельцем BMW, поэтому я тоже теперь часть этого комьюнити Несколько часов просто гулял по площадке, рассматривал машины, слушал истории владельцев, наблюдал за тем, как люди сво…
❤15🔥8👏3
Внешний рынок делает внутренние команды сильнее В мае выступал на отраслевом совещании департамента, где собрались представители ИТ и АСУ ТП направлений группы компаний «Газпром» Мое выступление стояло одним из последних, поэтому к моменту выхода на сцену я успел прослушать несколько часов докладов. Когда наконец получил микрофон, начал со слов: «Коллеги, наконец-то подошла моя очередь, я почти уснул». Получилось…
👍15❤9👏4🔥4
Самые интересные истории в IT не попадают в курсы и “экспертные” статьи Это я понял за последние несколько лет, которые наблюдаю за Telegram-каналами своих коллег Там мы видим только итоговый результат, но никогда не узнаем о десятках решений, сомнений, конфликтов интересов и работу людей, благодаря которым этот результат вообще стал возможен. Никто не пишет о том, как проект стоимостью в миллионы рублей месяцами с…
❤15🔥15👏4👍3🤯2
Channel created
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @talaevdanil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,112,141 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Talaev Danil / Product Owner / CDO” (@talaevdanil), 135 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/talaevdanil.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.