Channel
@takeshinetScamm3r
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002441275890 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @takeshinetScamm3r |
| Description | His wallet addresses, his links to Envoy AI and Fusion AI, and more! |
| Created | 17 January 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/takeshinetScamm3r |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 4 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:33 | 4 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 17 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 17 January 2025 to 2 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
TakeshiNetRunn3r - more like TakeshiNetScamm3r pinned «@ZegentAI - Same scam as @Envoy_Ethereum and @Fusion_ERC20 with a wallet connected to @CryptoNetRunn3r - STAY AWAY https://etherscan.io/address/0x582033efbdc608f12159165964fa9fb467d3af61 Takeshi's second wallet»
@ZegentAI - Same scam as @Envoy_Ethereum and @Fusion_ERC20 with a wallet connected to @CryptoNetRunn3r - STAY AWAY https://etherscan.io/address/0x582033efbdc608f12159165964fa9fb467d3af61 Takeshi's second wallet
He does not have 1mil in aixbt neither does his "circle"
https://t.me/CryptoNetScamm3r proof of his larps
Takeshi's ETH wallet - https://etherscan.io/address/0xf6ca173de68863fef0e5f6c5e9cbcf4420c4dc5e Takeshi's SOL wallet - https://gmgn.ai/sol/address/46NehqEHXyve7jrUTq6NygX1XrMsKvdjhhyKaL5EEzyv
Dumped his own coin on people
👍1
When called out, this is how the scammer responds - notice, he does not try and reply. He leaves Fusion AI and Envoy AI and Envoy AI's project "Ellen Degenerate" (a barely working AI product that was rugged) posts all over his page. This is how you can tell.
https://pump.fun/profile/46NehqEHXyve7jrUTq6NygX1XrMsKvdjhhyKaL5EEzyv A rug that he sold on his people as the dev.
Photo, posted without a caption
He owns 20 million in JARVIS. This is live off his Twitter
TakeshiNetRunn3r - more like TakeshiNetScamm3r pinned «@TakeshiNetRunn3r (CryptoNetRunn3r's SOL wallet and trades): https://gmgn.ai/sol/address/46NehqEHXyve7jrUTq6NygX1XrMsKvdjhhyKaL5EEzyv»
@TakeshiNetRunn3r (CryptoNetRunn3r's SOL wallet and trades): https://gmgn.ai/sol/address/46NehqEHXyve7jrUTq6NygX1XrMsKvdjhhyKaL5EEzyv
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @takeshinetScamm3r. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TakeshiNetRunn3r - more like TakeshiNetScamm3r” (@takeshinetScamm3r), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/takeshinetScamm3r.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.