Channel
@EnvoyAIScamFusionAIScam
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002285821855 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @EnvoyAIScamFusionAIScam |
| Description | Both scams |
| Created | 14 January 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/EnvoyAIScamFusionAIScam |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:30 | 10 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:29 | 10 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 14 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
4 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 3 | 75.0% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 14 January 2025 to 2 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
EnvoyAI is a Scam, New rebrand - FusionAI pinned «New group - @CryptoNetScamm3r@ZegentAI - Same scam as @Envoy_Ethereum and @Fusion_ERC20 with a wallet connected to @CryptoNetRunn3r - STAY AWAY https://etherscan.io/address/0x582033efbdc608f12159165964fa9fb467d3af61 Takeshi's second wallet»
New group - @CryptoNetScamm3r@ZegentAI - Same scam as @Envoy_Ethereum and @Fusion_ERC20 with a wallet connected to @CryptoNetRunn3r - STAY AWAY https://etherscan.io/address/0x582033efbdc608f12159165964fa9fb467d3af61 Takeshi's second wallet
👍1
New group exposing Takeshi's SOL wallet - @TakeshiNetScamm3r His connection to a pump.fun rug and also his possible connection with the Envoy/Fusion team means he is most likely one of those shillers that will take payment of $500 for a rug.
👍1
If you are seeing this, it probably is a bright idea to sell Fusion AI, as it will end up like its parent project Envoy AI in the near future. If you don't take my words, that's okay. Bookmark this.
👍1
EnvoyAI is a Scam, New rebrand - FusionAI pinned «On the blockchain, FusionAI has links to Envoy AI, their team which did a past rug. Coincidentally, CryptoNetRunn3r's wallet owned both, and Fusion AI has the same binance deposit address as Envoy AI. If you dig deep enough you can see that Envoy AI sent money…»
Takeshi (Net Runner)'s ETH plays are both related to eachother. Both rugs.
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Takeshi (Net Runner)'s ETH play wallet
Photo, posted without a caption
CryptoNetRunn3r's ETH wallet: https://etherscan.io/address/0xf6ca173de68863fef0e5f6c5e9cbcf4420c4dc5e On the Ethereum network (not Base), he has only bought two things - Envoy AI and Fusion AI. Would he blindly ape in both? How does he know about both? And why did he sell Envoy AI before it dumped to 0 and silently stop shilling it?
PROOF: https://etherscan.io/tx/0x019d5ed50c89cad9adcec8fecf531874e5f068bda49de6505f801ab64e7723c5 Envoy AI sending money to a Fusion AI deployer bundled wallet that sold off Wallet (Fusion AI/Envoy AI Team) - https://etherscan.io/address/0x15eb17f7a3e9ec0a6fccf540db27371ead746fb4
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @EnvoyAIScamFusionAIScam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“EnvoyAI is a Scam, New rebrand - FusionAI” (@EnvoyAIScamFusionAIScam), 10 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EnvoyAIScamFusionAIScam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.