Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TAKE_SUP

Channel

TAKE_SUP

@take_sup_rzn

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

702subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001797502654
TypeChannel
Username@take_sup_rzn
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/take_sup_rzn

Growth

70270470310 Aug 2026, 12:00 — 704 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 09:16 — 702 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 12:0011 Aug 2026, 09:16
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 702–704 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 09:16702-2
10 Aug 2026, 12:00704first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.5%
avg views ÷ 702 subscribers
Avg views / post
102
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held11 (4 August 202610 August 2026)
Views total1,123
Reactions total35
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

35 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1645.7%
🍓925.7%
👍514.3%
custom 534852252030574093725.71%
💔25.71%
🎉12.86%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 11:43 UTC19 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

ЖЕНСКИЙ РЕТРИТ «ПЕРЕХОД В ДУБКАХ» Иногда важно сделать один «ПЕРЕХОД», чтобы жизнь начала меняться. 📆 Дата: 15.08.2026 🕊️Время: 10:00 - 15:00 📍Место: Дубки 💸 Цена: 4500 Кому нужен этот день? — Тем, кто потерял себя в череде «должна» и «обязана»; — Тем, кто стоит перед выбором и не знает, куда шагнуть; — Тем, кто просто хочет побыть в кругу живых, понимающих женщин и наполниться энергией. Как мы проведём этот день

9 Aug 2026, 19:08 UTC89 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Закатные краски в Рыбацкой деревне

🔥7

9 Aug 2026, 06:14 UTC115 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня можно взять сапы в аренду: 📍Дубки 📍Рыбацкая деревня 1 час - 800 рублей 2 часа - 1500 рублей Запись через любой мессенджер: 8-961-133-34-00 @i_sveta_korn

🔥2

8 Aug 2026, 06:58 UTC110 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Бронь сапов: @i_sveta_korn

👍2

7 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC119 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

8 августа будем на фестивале Небо России Можно взять сапы в почасовую аренду на локации (будет стоять на противоположном берегу от фестиваля, координату скинем при записи). Лучше забронировать заранее себе сап на конкретное время. Стоимость: 1 час - 1000 руб. 2 часа - 1 500 руб. Забронировать сапы: @i_sveta_korn / 8-961-133-34-00 (любой мессенджер)

🔥2

7 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC114 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Сидим с Ротти и ждём участниц конкурса «Мисс Окская Стрелка» от Зелёного сада

🍓3custom 53485225203057409372

6 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC120 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

В субботу и воскресенье будем в Рыбацкой деревне. Сап-прогулки с инструктором: суббота 14.00-16.00 воскресенье 11.00-13.00 Также можно взять сапы в аренду для самостоятельного катания в любое время, предварительно забронировав их. Запись: 8-961-133-34-00 @i_sveta_korn

🔥2

5 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC124 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Такое ощущение, что сегодня вечером в Рыбацкой деревне был весь город, аншлаг на воде)

🍓6🎉1

4 Aug 2026, 11:26 UTC142 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Красоты мещерских озер

👍3💔2

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @take_sup_rzn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 328,810 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TAKE_SUP” (@take_sup_rzn), 702 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/take_sup_rzn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.