Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Набивая шишки. Заметки

@take_a_beating

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

172subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002502407800
TypeChannel
Username@take_a_beating
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/take_a_beating

Growth

171172171.56 August 2026 — 172 subscribers7 August 2026 — 171 subscribers8 August 2026 — 171 subscribers14 August 2026 — 172 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 171–172 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 07:04172+1
8 Aug 2026, 14:47171no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:13171-1
6 Aug 2026, 12:00172first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 12 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

150 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5134.0%
🔥3221.3%
👏2919.3%
💯1711.3%
💔106.67%
👍96.00%
🤡10.667%
🤯10.667%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 150reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 9 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Jul 2026, 09:43 UTC193 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

понимаю. что в Америке особый контекст, связанный с этим типом преступлений, но мне интересно, что вы думаете

5 Jul 2026, 09:42 UTC188 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Какой тип ситуации из описанных кажется вам более аморальным/тяжелым?

  1. свершившееся действие, принесшее моральные страдания, все живы75%
  2. мысли и намерения о массовом убийстве детей, не реализовано25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Jul 2026, 09:40 UTC142 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В процессе просмотра фильма у меня возникло желание свериться с вами, какой тип ситуаций вам кажется более аморальным поступком (это не будет сильным спойлером, потому что о событиях рассказывают прям в начале): Майк: когда на него и его девушку напала собака, он спрятался за девушкой, использовав ее как щит. Рэйчел: в юности она заперла мальчика с особенностями развития в шкафу, его потом долго искали. Он жив. Ча

5

19 Jun 2026, 19:44 UTC≈2,520 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Никогда не думала, что появится такой пост. Мне всегда казалось, что написание книг не для меня, ведь я не понимала, что я такого могу дать людям. Но какое-то время назад мне пришла мысль написать книгу для близких людей, которые совершили самоубийство. Тема табуирована, опубликованных произведений мало. А горя невыносимо много. Сейчас я ищу людей, чьи близкие ушли из жизни таким образом, и готовых рассказать свою и

👏20🔥148

18 Jun 2026, 11:33 UTC178 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @etre_poliPhoto

САХАРНАЯ ЗАВИСИМОСТЬ 🧁 Есть ли у сахара аддиктивный потенциал? Под аддиктивным потенциалом вещества понимается его способность вызывать патологическое пристрастие. Сейчас расскажу, как вообще теоретически может формироваться «зависимость от сахара» — и почему это не так однозначно. Есть известный обзор исследований Nicole Avena, Pedro Rada и Bartley Hoebel в журнале Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (2008). Чт

10💯4🔥3

15 Jun 2026, 21:48 UTC151 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Стоило только сюда написать и я вспомнила тему!

👏7

15 Jun 2026, 21:47 UTC155 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Представьте, вы столкнулись с ужасным событием в вашей жизни. На тот момент ваша психика не имела возможности переработать то, что случилось, но сделала все возможное, чтобы вы могли жить: появилась «нормально функционирующая личность» - та часть, которая ходит на работу, отвечает на сообщения, готовит ужин, поддерживает разговоры и вообще как-то справляется. Это такая стена между раненой частью и окружающей реальн

12💯3👏2

15 Jun 2026, 18:35 UTC146 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мне приснилась какая-то классная тема для поста, но я проснулась утром и забыла 🌚

💔10

12 Jun 2026, 20:55 UTC158 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ну, вы поняли картинку стащила у @G_tchk

👍9💯72🤡1🤯1

12 Jun 2026, 20:52 UTC133 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Некоторые размышления🌞 Психолог вы или работаете в другой сфере, поделитесь вашими открытиями. Мне очень интересно! #тексты@take_a_beating

14🔥5💯3

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @take_a_beating. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Jul 2026, 09:42 UTCAnonymous Poll48 voters

Какой тип ситуации из описанных кажется вам более аморальным/тяжелым?

  1. свершившееся действие, принесшее моральные страдания, все живы75%
  2. мысли и намерения о массовом убийстве детей, не реализовано25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 9 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 133,979 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Набивая шишки. Заметки” (@take_a_beating), 172 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/take_a_beating.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.