Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Так, я все придумал

Channel

Так, я все придумал

@tak_ya_vse_pridumal

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

479subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002454843684
TypeChannel
Username@tak_ya_vse_pridumal
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tak_ya_vse_pridumal

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4784884837 August 2026 — 487 subscribers8 August 2026 — 487 subscribers15 August 2026 — 488 subscribers22 August 2026 — 486 subscribers6 September 2026 — 478 subscribers14 September 2026 — 479 subscribers4797 August 202614 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 37 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 477–490 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 00:20479+1
6 Sept 2026, 00:21478-8
22 Aug 2026, 13:52486-2
15 Aug 2026, 06:43488+1
8 Aug 2026, 04:31487no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:31487first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 2 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 06s
Average length
1m 03s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

398 reactions across 18 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥13333.4%
❤8822.1%
😁4711.8%
💯4310.8%
👍266.53%
🍾184.52%
✍82.01%
👌61.51%
😎61.51%
🤔61.51%
👏51.26%
🙈51.26%
❤‍🔥20.503%
🌚20.503%
🦄20.503%
💔10.251%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 398 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2026 to 23 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
20
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 18 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tak_ya_vse_pridumal. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 March 2026 to 23 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Apr 2026, 13:42 UTC676 views23 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026

В начале недели был на встрече Онтико, где обсуждались вопросы ускорения разработки с использованием AI. Интересная мысль, что укорение разработки само по себе почти ничего не гарантирует. Если не растет качество дискавери, инженерная дисциплина и контроль, то вместе со скоростью растет только объем энтропии и проблем. Сейчас вокруг AI в разработке много разговоров из разряда “теперь будем писать в 2 раза быстрее”. …

💯19❤4

23 Apr 2026, 08:56 UTC596 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пока еще не так, но скоро будет 😁

😁42

12 Apr 2026, 15:01 UTC692 views27 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

С днем космонавтики! Сначала хотел написать что “Юра, мы все проебали”. Но кажется, что именно сейчас мы снова подходим к точке, где все может довольно резко измениться. И есть ощущение, что в ближайшие годы вполне могут появиться те самые технологические открытия и прорывы, которые реально двинут вперед освоение космоса. И я думаю,что тут даже не так важно, кто именно сделает этот следующий большой шаг первым. Пот…

🍾18❤9

7 Apr 2026, 08:31 UTC632 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Чем дольше работаю тем сильнее понимаю одну простую вещь – если кажется, что сталкиваешься какой-то очень особенной проблемой, то скорее всего, ее уже много раз кто-то решал. Не именно в твоей компании, не именно с твоими вводными, но по сути – да, решал. Команды не могут договориться. Легаси начинает съедать скорость разработки. Метрики вроде есть, а решений из них не получается. Бизнес хочет быстрее, а инженеры хо…

👍10❤6👌1

4 Apr 2026, 09:09 UTC525 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Отпуск - хорошее время подумать и отличное время продолжить написать )) И я давно размышлял, о чем именно хочу писать непосредственно здесь. Тем интересных много. Периодически хотелось фигаить вообще обо всем подряд, потому что в разных темах находится что-то, что интересно для меня и заставляет задуматься или посмеяться. Но проблема в том, что когда пытаешься говорить сразу обо всем то в итоге как-будто размываешьс…

❤14🔥8👏4

4 Apr 2026, 08:35 UTC471 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сайт, на котором можно посмотреть, где сейчас находится Орион из миссия Артемида-2. А еще красивые фото Земли в высоком разрешении, тут и тут.

❤7🔥4🌚2

2 Apr 2026, 06:59 UTC438 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Пока все спали - астронавты полетели к Луне

🔥15

29 Mar 2026, 12:58 UTC611 views33 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня побегали С Кайфом и ребятами из Звука 😎 Погода в Москве отличная, всем гулять! Забеги устраиваются каждые выходные, Антон @teachnfire замутил очень крутое комьюнити, присоединяйтесь!

🔥24❤5❤‍🔥2🦄2

26 Mar 2026, 05:22 UTC476 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Горжусь нашими ребятами, которые со своей научной статьей залетели на специализированный трек EACL от Spotify и Deezer про музыкальный поиск и рекомендации! Особенно круто, что это не просто исследование ради исследования, а то, что уже работает в проде.

❤12💯5

26 Mar 2026, 05:22 UTC602 views35 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @zvuk_jobsPhoto

🔥 Российский музыкальный сервис — на воркшопе от Spotify и Deezer Научную статью Звука и института AIRI приняли на специализированный трек конференции EACL — про музыкальный поиск и рекомендации! О чем статья: Мы научили ГигаМикс понимать, когда нужно показывать пользователю треки под его вкус, а когда — просто следовать описанию в запросе. Проблема простая: если человек пишет «треки для пробежки» — ему нужен перс…

🔥29👍6

25 Mar 2026, 18:23 UTC≈4,640 views26 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

Если вы вдруг так же устали, как я, то вот вам звездное небо с Марса, где тишина и красота.

❤24🔥2

24 Mar 2026, 21:12 UTC524 views27 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

За 3 дня и несколько часов наговнокодил собрал себе Pace – телеграм бота/персонального ассистента, который еще и трекер привычек, напоминалка, партнер и помощник по рабочим задачам. Сейчас это небольшая агентная система на nanoclaw: входящее сообщение сначала проходит через оркестратор, потом роутится либо в конкретный скилл, либо в fallback-LLM. За счет этого свободный текст можно писать как угодно, а система сама …

🔥19😎6❤1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @tak_ya_vse_pridumal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Так, я все придумал” (@tak_ya_vse_pridumal), 479 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tak_ya_vse_pridumal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.