🟠 "ДЕНЕЖНЫЙ МАГНИТ" 🔴

Channel
Тайна Жрицы
@tainazhritsy_official
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
20,873subscribers
-678 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001698731968 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tainazhritsy_official |
| Description | Заявление № 8182021198 Духовное пространство для каждого. Мощные практики на любовь, финансы, бизнес, исполнение желаний. Канал, где исполняются мечты. Связь со мной - @Julia_Mironova777 Сайт: https://tainazhritsy.ru/ |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tainazhritsy_official |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 22:10 | 20,873 | -5 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 16:56 | 20,878 | -1 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 16:16 | 20,879 | -5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 17:16 | 20,884 | -7 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 14:26 | 20,891 | -8 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 14:45 | 20,899 | -9 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 07:36 | 20,908 | -3 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 10:07 | 20,911 | -6 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 11:55 | 20,917 | -1 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 10:49 | 20,918 | -1 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 09:29 | 20,919 | +2 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 05:56 | 20,917 | -5 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 04:37 | 20,922 | -1 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 06:07 | 20,923 | -1 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 02:45 | 20,924 | -3 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 02:08 | 20,927 | -11 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 20:47 | 20,938 | -8 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 18:00 | 20,946 | -3 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 18:40 | 20,949 | -4 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 19:26 | 20,953 | first reading |
Engagement
615 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.17%
- avg views ÷ 20,873 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 662
- 102 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 6.65%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 102
- of 615 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 96 of 102 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 615 (6 August 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 67,475 |
| Reactions total | 4,315 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 03:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈10,500
- Videos
- ≈6,410
- Links
- ≈1,610
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 3h 10m
- Average length
- 55s
Measured directly from 209 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
22,660 reactions across 558 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15,157 | 66.9% | |
| 👍 | 2,618 | 11.6% | |
| 🙏 | 2,462 | 10.9% | |
| 🔥 | 1,169 | 5.16% | |
| 🕊 | 444 | 1.96% | |
| 🥰 | 262 | 1.16% | |
| 👏 | 240 | 1.06% | |
| ❤🔥 | 155 | 0.684% | |
| 😁 | 68 | 0.3% | |
| 🎉 | 48 | 0.212% | |
| 🤔 | 20 | 0.088% | |
| 🤩 | 8 | 0.035% | |
| 👌 | 6 | 0.026% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 0.013% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 562 of the 615 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22,660 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 615 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 102 posts held from the last 30 days (1.96%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
✅ Мечтаете о финансовой свободе? Тогда приготовьтесь притянуть богатство в свою жизнь с помощью мощнейшего онлайн-ритуала 🆘"ДЕНЕЖНЫЙ МАГНИТ"! 🆘 ✔️ Представьте: деньги текут к вам рекой, возможности открываются на каждом шагу, а ваши желания воплощаются в реальность! Хватит мечтать – пора действовать! ✔️ "ДЕНЕЖНЫЙ МАГНИТ" – это уникальный онлайн-ритуал, основанный на древней практике и энергетическом законе, который…
Video, posted without a caption
❤24👍7🕊1
🌙 ВЕЧЕР 8 НОЯБРЯ: ОСТАВЬТЕ ДНЮ ЕГО ЗАБОТЫ Тихого вечера, мои дорогие ✨ Воскресенье подходит к концу, а мысли уже могут спешить в понедельник. Хочется все предусмотреть, ничего не забыть и заранее найти силы на новую неделю Сегодня я предлагаю сначала закрыть этот день и дать себе несколько минут покоя 🪬 Вечерняя практика ✔️ Сядьте удобно и положите ладони на колени ✔️ Вспомните один момент дня, за который хочется…
❤28👍4🥰4🔥2🕊1
🔮 ТАРО НА 9 НОЯБРЯ: КОРОЛЕВА ПЕНТАКЛЕЙ И ЗАБОТА О СЕБЕ Когда день заполнен чужими просьбами и делами, собственные потребности легко отложить на потом. Сегодняшняя карта предлагает заметить, что поможет вам почувствовать опору уже сейчас 🌿 Карта дня – Королева Пентаклей Королева держит в руках пентакль и внимательно смотрит на него. В этом образе я вижу спокойную заботу о том, что нам дорого: о доме, теле, времени …
❤38👍4🙏2🔥1🕊1
11.11, это очень мощная денежная дата В этот день можно усилить своё намерение, связанное с доходом, крупной покупкой, выплатой или другой финансовой целью до конца года. Я открываю запись на индивидуальную практику по фото «Денежный магнит». Во время работы по фото будет поставлена программа на возможности, решения и действия, которые могут приблизить вас к финансовой цели. Также я отправлю вам подробную инструкц…
❤14🔥2
Немного юмора в ленту)
😁45❤4🔥2👍1🕊1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤29🔥10🕊2🙏1
Video, posted without a caption
❤48🙏18🔥8👍1🕊1
Photo, posted without a caption
🙏36👍11❤7🔥5🕊1
☀️ УТРО 8 НОЯБРЯ: НАМЕРЕНИЕ НА НОВУЮ НЕДЕЛЮ Доброе воскресное утро, мои дорогие ✨ Иногда мы начинаем день с чужих просьб и новостей, а к своим желаниям возвращаемся только вечером. Сегодня я предлагаю сначала уделить несколько минут себе 🔮 Совет дня До того как открыть сообщения, спросите себя: «Что я хочу сохранить в своей жизни на следующей неделе?» Это может быть время для отдыха, важное дело или общение, котор…
❤37👍10🙏7🔥1🕊1
Video, posted without a caption
❤31👍15🙏6
Showing the 12 most recent of 615 posts we hold for @tainazhritsy_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@tainazhritsy_official edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 6 November 2026
- Most recent edit
- 6 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 6 posts on @tainazhritsy_official as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 9 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 30 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 26 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@magicheskaya_lavka_yuliany · 2,183#1
@obolenov · 71,122#2
@TAROGELANI · 4,189 (as read 24 September 2026)#3
@life_magic718 · 4,454#4
@white_magia · 64,419#5
@svflamen · 41,675#6
@asmr8angel · 443 (as read 24 September 2026)#7
@day_message · 7,550#8
@mestotvoeisili · 6,121#9
@JuliaTaroTG · 428 (as read 24 September 2026)#10
@simoron_magic_telegram · 6,047#11
@runesgeteiva · 6,431#12
@magiya_svechii · 32,920#13
@mimamomo8 · 2,637#14
@ProstoFeya9 · 361 (as read 24 September 2026)#15
@ezoterika_female · 52,799#16
@anna_vselenay · 7,330#17
@karinatarotv · 20,393#18
@metaphysics_evergreen · 4,551#19
@arkturanor · 5,506#20
@Taro_Valentina · 4,248#21
@new_meditation · 10,362#22
@Eva_TarotTeaS · 3,220#23
@Tatyana_Terssa · 9,277#24
@tkalenkonumerolog · 6,649#25
@martinaageeva · 10,681#26
@jamoguvse · 7,187#27
@celitel_molitva · 4,171#28
@angelawitch_magic · 5,965#29
@Lana_magic_tarot_9 · 4,033#30
@o_znakah · 48,280#31
@simoronelli · 9,270#32
@taroveka · 2,905#33
@nburleva · 326 (as read 24 September 2026)#34
@tornanumerolog · 17,915#35
@astroezo2 · 6,781#36
@alena_laska · 10,065#37
@anastasirun · 7,582#38
@vedma_znayet · 583 (as read 24 September 2026)#39
@jiznkakchastie · 2,744 (as read 24 September 2026)#40
@balatskaja · 21,272#41
@runes_studenikina · 3,580#42
@JuliaBulbash · 5,624#43
@svetasharit · 9,257#44
@ezoterikaF · 9,092#45
@NataliaKuper · 16,299#46
@SlavynstvoSiynaIisa · 5,741#47
@academy_panushkina · 6,721#48
@moyizobilie · 8,112#49
@aratron1 · 14,835#50
@taropsyhology · 4,218 (as read 24 September 2026)#51
@ygvolhebnica · 8,133#52
@WellRunes · 7,628#53
@ezforyou8 · 6,573#54
@energy_blago · 10,588#55
@magnit_dyshi · 7,172#56
@golddragonclubb · 5,406#57
@liliannataro66 · 21,120#58
@magialili · 7,272#59
@guruomm · 6,968#60
@your_ezoteric · 15,609#61
@Uroki_Taro_Lana · 236 (as read 24 September 2026)#62
@mirishamanki · 949 (as read 24 September 2026)#63
@tainy_schastya · 2,070#64
@npravdina999 · 17,956#65
@zhenchinachudoprirodi · 708 (as read 24 September 2026)#66
@mir_simoron · 4,189#67
@anael_numerolog · 69,030#68
@SorokinaOlga_writer · 18,356#69
@izmenemierealnosi · 13,508#70
@vedascara_official · 7,154 (as read 24 September 2026)#71
@chulanvedmy · 11,290#72
@nadezhda_magia · 3,662 (as read 24 September 2026)#73
@seemoron · 16,259#74
@privoroticom · 1,207#75
@secretsd · 11,549#76
@MagGgeorg · 16,092#77
@vedmy666 · 11,039#78
@olgaa_znayu · 8,802#79
@astroeye · 22,098#80
@tropa_vedmy · 15,976#81
@Bereginyalekar · 2,300#82
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@karinatarotv · 20,393
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 September 2026
@obolenov · 71,122
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
@nitariadni777 · 19,234
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 2 October 2026
@meditationsoundss · 27,838
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 September 2026
@fatimakhadueva369 · 19,346
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 4 October 2026
@angelapearl_astrology · 52,740
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Тайна Жрицы” (@tainazhritsy_official), 20,873 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tainazhritsy_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.