Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for К изобилию с Натальей Светлой

Channel

К изобилию с Натальей Светлой

@life_magic718

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,528subscribers

-23 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002123926793
TypeChannel
Username@life_magic718
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/life_magic718

Growth

4,5274,5514,5398 August 2026 — 4,551 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,551 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,550 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,543 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,541 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,536 subscribers21 August 2026 — 4,532 subscribers24 August 2026 — 4,530 subscribers27 August 2026 — 4,527 subscribers31 August 2026 — 4,528 subscribers4,5288 August 202631 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 23 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,523–4,555 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 05:044,528+1
27 Aug 2026, 20:484,527-3
24 Aug 2026, 16:554,530-2
21 Aug 2026, 04:074,532-4
17 Aug 2026, 19:264,536-5
14 Aug 2026, 21:084,541-2
11 Aug 2026, 13:544,543-7
8 Aug 2026, 08:324,550-1
8 Aug 2026, 07:004,551no change
8 Aug 2026, 06:534,551first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.75%
avg views ÷ 4,528 subscribers
Avg views / post
306
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held25 (16 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total3,055
Reactions total503
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,382 reactions across 25 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,01473.4%
🔥21715.7%
👍886.37%
🙏412.97%
❤‍🔥80.579%
💯50.362%
🦄50.362%
🥰30.217%
🎉10.072%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,382reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 05:07 UTC64 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🕊️ Настрой на день Я легко притягиваю изобилие и процветание во всех сферах жизни. ⭐ Для активации энергий пишите в комментариях: «Я люблю свою жизнь» #аффирмации 🌞 С теплом, Наталья Светлая

16👍5

11 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC159 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026

НАЧНИ С НУЛЯ Каждая из нас следит за внешним видом. Я уверена: у любой женщины есть крем - дневной, ночной, хоть небольшая косметичка. Нам важно хорошо выглядеть в любом возрасте. Представьте: если после умывания не нанести крем, кожа стягивается. И вы весь день чувствуете себя некомфортно. А теперь представьте: за лицом и телом мы ухаживаем каждый день, а за внутренним миром - нет. Тревогу, обиды, чужие слова м

30🔥6

11 Aug 2026, 05:02 UTC195 views52 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🕊️ Настрой на день Я притягиваю в свою жизнь искренние и теплые отношения, наполненные взаимопониманием и радостью. ⭐ Для активации энергий пишите в комментариях: «Я есть любовь» #аффирмации 🌞 С теплом, Наталья Светлая

45👍5🔥2

10 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC232 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

КОГДА ВСЁ РУХНУЛО.... 7 августа у меня был день рождения. Утром я поехала к маме. Это моя традиция: день рождения начинается с неё, с самого родного человека. Потом вокруг меня собрались люди, которые ценят меня не за то, что я что-то много знаю. Ценно другое: мы умеем слышать и понимать друг друга, бережём друг друга. В таких отношениях можно просто быть собой. А сообщения в этот день… у меня шли мурашки по коже.

31🔥11

10 Aug 2026, 04:59 UTC241 views53 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🕊️ Настрой на день Я обладаю огромной внутренней силой и мудростью. Я уверенно иду к своим целям. ⭐ Для активации энергий пишите в комментариях: «Принимаю дары Вселенной» #аффирмации 🌞 С теплом, Наталья Светлая

39🔥11👍3

8 Aug 2026, 05:34 UTC355 views55 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🕊️ Настрой на день Моя женская энергия течет свободно, наполняя меня сиянием и красотой. ⭐ Для активации энергий пишите в комментариях: «Я источник женской силы» #аффирмации 🌞 С теплом, Наталья Светлая

39👍10❤‍🔥3🔥3

6 Aug 2026, 05:10 UTC419 views75 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🕊️ Настрой на день Я ощущаю глубокое внутреннее спокойствие, которое дарит мне уверенность. ⭐ Для активации энергий пишите в комментариях: «Я спокойна и уверена» #аффирмации 🌞 С теплом, Наталья Светлая

52🔥17👍4💯2

5 Aug 2026, 05:04 UTC438 views64 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🕊️ Настрой на день Я легко привлекаю изобилие и благополучие в свою жизнь. ⭐ Для активации энергий пишите в комментариях: «Изобилие приходит ко мне» #аффирмации 🌞 С теплом, Наталья Светлая

46🔥9🙏7👍1💯1

3 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC531 views47 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Что делать, когда всё рушится как карточный домик? Ну не бывает в жизни всё гладко, потому что мы-то с Вами живые люди, а не какой-нибудь искусственный интеллект. Бывает, что вроде всё сделали правильно. А потом раз, и всё рассыпалось. Первая реакция: «Нужно срочно что-то делать». «Наверное, я сама виновата». Но самобичевание не помогает. И чем сильнее мы пытаемся удержать сразу десять процессов, тем тяжелее станов

38🔥9

3 Aug 2026, 05:40 UTC421 views58 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🕊️ Настрой на день Моя женственность — это сила, которая вдохновляет и преображает. ⭐ Для активации энергий пишите в комментариях: «Я есть мудрость» #аффирмации 🌞 С теплом, Наталья Светлая

43👍8🔥7

30 Jul 2026, 05:20 UTC584 views68 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🕊️ Настрой на день Я открыта изобилию и благополучию. Денежная энергия свободно входит в мою жизнь. ⭐ Для активации энергий пишите в комментариях: «Я магнит для изобилия» #аффирмации 🌞 С теплом, Наталья Светлая

51👍7🙏5🔥4💯1

29 Jul 2026, 05:40 UTC609 views74 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🕊️ Настрой на день Моё сердце знает, что принесёт мне радость, счастье и вдохновение. Я доверяю себе и с любовью выбираю то, чего хочу именно я. ⭐ Для активации энергий пишите в комментариях: «Я принимаю изобилие» #аффирмации 🌞 С теплом, Наталья Светлая

54🔥11👍6🙏2💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @life_magic718. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 547,781 of 1,628,927entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“К изобилию с Натальей Светлой” (@life_magic718), 4,528 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/life_magic718.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.