Channel
@tagesereignisse
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,063subscribers
-30 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001386943728 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tagesereignisse |
| Created | 6 October 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tagesereignisse |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @tagesereignisse/3785 · this entry8 Feb 2024, 11:35 UTC | @TEtagesereignis/12748 Feb 2024, 11:36 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @TEtagesereignis | 11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (7–4) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 22 January 2024 to 26 February 2024. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @tagesereignisse — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 6 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 7,063 | -7 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 7,070 | -10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:12 | 7,080 | -11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 7,091 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:20 | 7,093 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:41 | 7,093 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Auch die CIA bestätigt, so Tucker, durch die Hintertür, dass Nawalny einen natürlichen Tod erlitten haben soll. Vorsichtig ausgedrückt. Der ukrainische Geheimdienst dürfte nicht allein gehandelt haben. Da sollte man vielleicht mal anfragen, warum die amerikanische Regierung gegen die Russen 500+ Sanktionen verhängt. Schließlich haben sie dafür zwei Argumente genannt, die keine sein dürften: 1. Putin führt Krieg (dar…
Ich habe mich sehr gefreut, dass dieses Thema endlich vom Tisch sein sollte und warum es eine richtige Schlappe für die Biden-Administration ist, das geht aus einem Beitrag hervor, der schon einige Jahre alt ist. Das dürfte sitzen und es wird interessant sein, zu sehen, wie dieses „Problem“ gelöst wird. Ich habe heute Nacht außer der Pravda leider keinen anderen Beweis für die Aussage gefunden, dass die Ukraine zuge…
❗️Wer oder was tötete Nawalny? Im Krieg wird gelogen, dass sich die Balken biegen. Aber dass es Putin war, ist eher unwahrscheinlich, denn der ist nicht dumm und kann vorausdenken. Auf Twitter läuft gerade ein Propagandaprogamm, aber interessanter ist eigentlich, dass Biden schon vor Jahren wusste, was er machen würde, wenn Nawalny von „Putin ermordet werden würde“. Denn das war ihm offenbar schon damals klar, dass…
In eigener Sache: Nach einer internen Sicherheitsbesprechung sehen wir uns gezwungen, die Öffentlichkeit über eine aktuelle Bedrohungslage gegen AUF1 zu informieren. ⚠️ Eine Stellungnahme sehen Sie morgen, Freitag, um 10 Uhr exklusiv hier auf unserem Telegramkanal: https://t.me/auf1tv
❗️Dubai: Redet sich Tucker Carlson um Kopf und Kragen? Bei einem Interview auf dem Podium des Weltregierungsgipfels in Dubai wurde Tucker sehr deutlich gegenüber Biden. Die Amerikaner nehmen sich diese Freiheit, aber wie ist es, wenn man das bei einem Ereignis tut, auf das die ganze Welt schaut? Viele haben nun Angst um ihn, einen der mutigsten investigativen Journalisten, die wir derzeit haben. Das Interview habe…
Sorry, etwas spät... Habt alle einen angenehmen Tag 🙏🍀 YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uP4q8j7WJrk Rumble - https://rumble.com/v4c5src-wird-julian-assange-demnchst-an-die-usa-ausgeliefert-der-britische-oberste-.html
‼️Wird Julian Assange demnächst an die USA ausgeliefert? Der britische Oberste Gerichtshof könnte noch im Februar darüber entscheiden Nach fünf Jahren Haft in einem der schlimmsten britischen Gefängnisse wird eventuell noch in diesem Monat der britische Oberste Gerichtshof über das weitere Schicksal eines der mutigsten Journalisten unserer Zeit, Julian Assange, entscheiden. Er hatte einst den Fehler begangen, die Wa…
🛑Zu dem noch nicht offiziellen Tucker-Putin-Interview wurde ich gefragt, ob ich es für echt halte. Tatsächlich sehe ich im Moment keinen Grund, das nicht zu tun. Wenn es Fake wäre, dann wäre er hervorragend und jemand hätte sich sehr gut in beide hineinversetzen können. Das halte ich für unwahrscheinlich. Putin kommt genauso rüber, wie immer: Ruhig, ausgeglichen, freundlich. Was viele nicht wissen, ist, dass Mensch…
⚠️ Es spukt seit heute Nacht die Abschrift eines Interviews mit Putin herum Es sind Fragen zu Putins Gesundheitszustand, zu Selensky, zu Trump und zu Biden, zur Wahl 2020 usw. Wenn es echt ist, dann hat Putin alle beantwortet und war sehr offen. Allerdings ist es doppelt und dreifach und durcheinander gepostet worden, sodass ich auf eine Übersetzung verzichte, solange es nicht offiziell ist. Der Anfang ist zum Beisp…
Wie erwartet ist Tucker Carlson in Moskau. Hier sagt er, warum er Putin interviewen wird.
👆Wie im obigen Beitrag berichtet, hat er es bereits im August versucht. Gerade nochmal hier gefunden. Die sollten es wissen. Es geht dann wohl tatsächlich um ein Interview.
RT DE Margarita Simonjan: "Tucker Carlson bittet dringend um Interview mit Putin" Der ehemalige Fox-News-Moderator Tucker Carlson bemüht sich um ein Interview mit dem russischen Präsidenten Wladimir Putin, sagte RT-Chefredakteurin Margarita Simonjan am Sonntag. "[Carlson] bittet dringend um ein Interview mit Wladimir Putin", sagte Simonjan in einer Talkshow des Fernsehsenders Rossija-1 und fügte hinzu: -----------…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tagesereignisse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 297,400 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TAGESEREIGNIS.DE ⭐️⭐️⭐️” (@tagesereignisse), 7,063 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tagesereignisse.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.