7 measurements spanning 42 days, net +24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 257–291 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 08:00
287
+11
10 Sept 2026, 06:20
276
+1
8 Sept 2026, 08:23
275
no change
31 Aug 2026, 13:36
275
+8
23 Aug 2026, 18:54
267
+6
16 Aug 2026, 04:17
261
-2
6 Aug 2026, 19:16
263
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
69.7%
avg views ÷ 287 subscribers
Avg views / post
200
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held
20 (30 March 2026 – 31 August 2026)
Views total
800
Reactions total
44
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Sept 2026, 08:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
38s
Average length
38s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
312 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
248
79.5%
❤🔥
27
8.65%
💔
22
7.05%
🔥
8
2.56%
💯
6
1.92%
🥰
1
0.321%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 312 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
أراد عالم نازي معرفة المدة التي يموت فيها الإنسان من البرد، فراح وأخذ مجموعة من الغجر، واليهود وبعض السود، ووضعهم في أحواض من الماء المثلج، ثم راح يراقب أجسادهم وهي تفقد حرارتها تدريجيًا، ويسجل المدة التي يستطيع فيها الإنسان مقاومة البرد، ومتى يفقد وعيه، ومتى يموت. وكان الهدف من هذه التجارب معرفة أفضل الطرق لإنقاذ الطيارين الألمان الذين قد يسقطون في مياه شديدة البرودة.
قد تبدو هذه التجارب، للوهلة الأولى، مجرد فصل مظ…
🌱 ثمار يعود من جديد!
بعد فترة من التوقف، نعود إليكم بموسم جديد من برنامج ثمار، وهذه المرة في موسمه الرابع ضمن أنشطة نادي تفكّر 📚✨
اشتقنا للجلسات، وللنقاشات وكعادتنا في ثمار، ليست الغاية أن نقرأ الكتاب فقط، بل أن نتوقف، نفكر، ونتحاور. 🌿
📖 كتاب جديد
💭 أفكار تستحق النقاش
☕ وجلسات تجمعنا من جديد
أهلًا بكم في الموسم الرابع من ثمار.
نقرأ معًا… ونُثمر فكرًا. 🍃
ثمة هزيمة داخلية في الفكر العربي تجعل من الغرب المرجعية الوحيدة ومصدر المعرفة الأوحد."
هذه العبارة تفكيك لعمق أزمتنا عندما يستبطن المنهزم وعي المنتصر، فيتبنى عدسته ويرى نفسه وتاريخه من خلالها. وهذه الأزمة فضلاً عن كونها استنساخ لتجربة تاريخية مختلفة، فهي ايضاً تبني للنموذج المعرفي المادي. وهو نموذج يحمل تحيزاته الكامنة، ويختزل الوجود والإنسان في أبعاد مادية وإجرائية صلبة. هذا الاستلاب جعلنا نعيد قراءة تراثنا بأثر ر…
التقنية… هل هي مجرد أدوات في أيدينا؟ 🤔
نستخدم الهاتف الحاسوب الذكاء الاصطناعي ومختلف التقنيات كل يوم، ونظن أننا نحن من نُسخّرها لتحقيق ما نريد.
لكن… هل العلاقة بهذه البساطة؟
هل التقنية مجرد وسيلة نستخدمها كما نشاء؟
أم أن لها طريقة خاصة في النظر إلى العالم، بدأت تؤثر في علاقتنا بالأشياء والإنسان والحياة؟
كيف غيّرت التقنية طريقتنا في رؤية العالم؟
وهل ما زال الإنسان هو من يُسخّر التقنية لإرادته؟
🎙️ نادي تفكّر يدعوك…
«إنقاذ حياة إنسان واحد هو إنقاذ لعائلته ، لأبويه ، لأقاربه ، لأصدقائه ، لمحبيه ، لكل الروابط المجتمعية اللي تربطه ويه الناس ، إنقاذ للعلم اللي ممكن يقدمه للناس ، إنقاذ للخدمات اللي ممكن ينفع بيهه الناس ، إنقاذ لكل شيء فيه خير ممكن يترتب من حياة هذا الشخص،
بتعبير أشمل ، إنقاذ لكل البشرية… وهذا قريب من قوله تعالى : (وَ مَنْ أَحْياها فَكَأَنَّما أَحْيَا النَّاسَ جَمِيعاً)»
- من كلام للدكتور المرحوم علي أكبر
قد كان المرحوم المسؤول عن مجلة النادي وطباعتها والإشراف عليها وكان مسؤول القسم الفكري فيها
ذا قلم يراعٍ قل أن ترى مثله، وقد كتب الدكتور مقالتين هما من أروع ما كُتِب من حيث الموضوع والتناول، يتناول فيهما موضوعين نحن بأحوج ما يكون لفهمهما فهما صحيحا …
أرفقهما أدناه عسى أن يُتَعَرَّف على بعض قدره وقدر الخسارة التي تكبّدناها بفقده…
"الطالب الذي يقلق بشأن مستقبله... من المؤكد أنه لن يبلي بلاءً حسناً كمثل من لا يهتم بشيء سوى المهمة التي بين يديه.
إن مهمتك ليست أن تتطلع إلى ما يلوح باهتًا في الأفق البعيد، بل أن تنجز ما هو ماثِلٌ بوضوح بين يديك."
— Sir William Osler (1913)
ليش لازم تقرأ "رُبُع سَاعة" باليوم بأيام الامتحانات؟ 📚
طالب الطب في أيام الفاينل يعيش ضغط ذهني كبير ..
مواد صعبة، معلومات متراكمة، ساعات طويلة من التركيز، وشعور دائم بأن الدماغ مُثقَل ..
مع هذا الضغط، الدماغ يحتاج مساحة راحة، وتنويع في نوع المعلومات، ونقطة توازن خارج الإطار الطبي الصارم.
القراءة غير الطبية (حتى لو لمدة ربع ساعة باليوم بس) تعمل كاستراحة للدماغ 🧠..
راح تقلّل التوتر وتعيد تنظيم أفكارك وتبقيك كَـ -طالب …
❤19❤🔥5🔥2💯1
Signed كـاظم عمـار كـاظم
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tafakurlibrary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مكتبة تفكُّر” (@tafakurlibrary), 287 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tafakurlibrary.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
