اون رفت، اون رفت، اون رفت شب خوش❤️
❤49🤨12🌚8😢4🥰2🔥1

Channel
@tafaghodifalsafe
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,975subscribers
+1,140 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001971144534 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tafaghodifalsafe |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tafaghodifalsafe |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 10:19 | 6,975 | +181 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 17:21 | 6,794 | +81 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 01:56 | 6,713 | +229 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:17 | 6,484 | +91 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:46 | 6,393 | +130 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:53 | 6,263 | +76 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 13:25 | 6,187 | +191 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 09:36 | 5,996 | -128 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 6,124 | +214 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 5,910 | +75 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:30 | 5,835 | no change |
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:21 | 5,835 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,192 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 892 | 40.7% | |
| 🤨 | 373 | 17.0% | |
| 🌚 | 316 | 14.4% | |
| 😢 | 297 | 13.5% | |
| 🤯 | 137 | 6.25% | |
| 👍 | 71 | 3.24% | |
| 🥰 | 48 | 2.19% | |
| 🙏 | 28 | 1.28% | |
| 😱 | 16 | 0.73% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 0.547% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.091% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,192 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
اون رفت، اون رفت، اون رفت شب خوش❤️
❤49🤨12🌚8😢4🥰2🔥1
🎬ویدیو جلسه اول کلاس سالیانه فلسفه و منطق ویژه کنکور ۴۰۶ https://www.aparat.com/v/cnx1v9m
❤12😢3🥰1🙏1
مدام گرینه برای معلوم شدن نیاز به استدلال دارد؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🤯65🥰16🤨10🌚6❤4😢2😱1
برای درک بهتر یک دانش اموز کنکوری باید در هفته حداقل ۲۵-۳۰ ساعت مطالعه و تست داشته باشه، بدون حساب کزدن زمان کلاس،حالا حساب کنید از مهر مدرسه هم میرید.
❤43👍4
اگه نیاز به محتوای اضافه ای باشه، من افلاین جدا ضبط میکنم که هر وقت زمان داشتید ببینید پس نگران هیچی نباشید❤️
❤45
سلام وقتتون بخیر یه موردی که زیاد پرسیده شده ببینن عزیزان افزایش زمان تدریس میتونه برا من از همه بهتر باشه مثلا به جای تدریس فلسفه و منطق کنکور در ۳ ساعت، اگه هفته ای ۶ ساعت کلاس باشه من خیلی دستم باز تره اما این امر برای شما خوب نیست.عزیزان یاد کرفتن یک درس صرفا کلاس نیست، شما باید بعد کلاس در هفته بخونید و کلی تست بزنید، شما در حالت عادیم زمان کم میارید چه برسه اینکه بخوام کلاس رو دوجلسه کنیم در هفته
❤51👍10
پاسخ:گزینه۱ قواعد علم منطق وضع و کشف شدنی هستند همانند قواعد علم فیزیک که آنها هم بوده اند در طبیعت و فیزیکدان آنها را کشف کرده است. بررسی گزینه۲:تاکید منطق روی آموزش نحوه درست اندیشیدن است. گرینه۳:دسته بندی مغالطات، روش سلبی هست ولی بیان روش درست فکر کردن روش ایجابی است و ربطی بهم ندارند. گزینه۴:هیچگاه نمی توان ادعا کرد که به دام مغالطه نمی افتیم، زیرا مغالطات بی شمار هستند و انسان همیشه در معرض به دام افتادن است…
❤91😢3👍2🔥1
لاماهای نادان😒
🌚296😢132🤨40🥰20😱14🤯7❤6🔥4
کدام گزینه درباره علم منطق درست است؟
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🤨306🤯64❤16👍9😢8🌚4👏1
بخشید سرتون درد اوردم❤️
❤153🥰6🙏3🌚2🔥1😢1
برای مشاهده و تهیه کتاب تست وارد این لینک بشید و کتاب خودتون انتخاب کنید https://moniaz.ir/teachers/%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%85%D8%AF-%D8%AA%D9%81%D9%82%D8%AF%DB%8C
❤34🔥2
علاوه بر خود سایت، برای شما پیام خواهد اومد و به شما دقیق میگه چه تست هایی اضافه شده
❤21🙏7👍1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tafaghodifalsafe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
مدام گرینه برای معلوم شدن نیاز به استدلال دارد؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
کدام گزینه درباره علم منطق درست است؟
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“محمد تفقدی” (@tafaghodifalsafe), 6,975 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tafaghodifalsafe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.