Channel
@tact_kitchen
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
518subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002180657744 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tact_kitchen |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tact_kitchen |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 518 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 517 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 517 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
226 reactions across 20 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | 226 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 226reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 February 2025 to 30 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎉 Tact Language Server & VS Code Extension v0.8.0 are live! Smarter code insight, TL-B support, fresh UI touches and a faster, quieter indexer — all wrapped into v0.8.0 release! 🚀 Headline features ▪️ Flexible toolchain picker – point the extension at any local Tact toolchain and switch them on the fly. ▪️ TL-B first-class citizen – syntax highlighting, completions, document symbols, go-to-references and inline hi…
⚡12
🎉 Tact v1.6.12 is released! This is another joint release: both v1.6.11 and v1.6.12 were published consecutively. The former focused on fixing bugs and implementing performance optimizations, while the latter introduced new quality-of-life features, such as support for toCell() and toSlice() methods on contract types, as well as improvements in trait-based inheritance attributes. By using the v1.6.12, you get the b…
⚡11
We’ve launched the ultimate hunt for bugs and hacker mastery — the epic CTF has begun at positive.com/ctf! On the menu: blazing challenges in EVM and TON security — plus one juicy Bug Bounty worth 100 TON!
⚡4
🎉 Tact v1.6.10 is released! Recently, TVM version 10 was rolled out in the mainnet. It introduced a number of new and interesting changes, the most notable being the addition of extra currencies and the removal of anycast addresses in favor of fixed address prefixes, which allows deploying a contract to an arbitrary shard. The Tact team has already begun work on preparing convenient ways to work with both. However,…
⚡10
For you all, JetBrains IDEs lovers: intelli-tact plugin release 📸 🍲 got IDEA? ♨️ @tact_kitchen from the @ton_studio
⚡9
🎉 Tact v1.6.7 is released! We've been listening to your feedback and analyzing the code written throughout the Tact Smart Battle. The battle was heated, with talented developers pushing Tact to its limits and helping us uncover valuable insights to improve the language, introduce new optimizations, and squish some bugs. ❤️ Thank you for participating! The $20,000 prize pool in Toncoin has been distributed to the to…
⚡11
🏆 The Tact Smart Battle is going strong — here are some preliminary standings. You can still enter the competition and show off your best gas optimizations — the deadline is April 28th, at 12:00 UTC+3. 👉 Hop in: http://codeforces.com/contests/2105 🍲 message sending cell smashing fist ♨️ @tact_kitchen from the @ton_studio
⚡10
🎉 Tact v1.6.6 is released! The final patch release of this v1.6 series is upon us, and it brings a significant tooling improvement, amongst other things. Meet the official Tact formatter — a new tool that ensures consistent code style across your Tact projects. It ships with Tact v1.6.6, and you can run it in your projects via npx tact-fmt or by invoking a format command in your editor. You'd need to install the Tac…
⚡16
🧠 Tact Smart Battle 🤜 Join the ultimate smart contract challenge powered by Tact, organized by TON Studio & Codeforces 🏅 Prize Pool — $20,000 in Toncoin! 🎯 Challenge Tasks: 1. Simple Voting — basic voting system. 2. Serial Voting — multiple proposals via a master contract. 3. Scalable Voting — support up to 4 billion voters. 4. Voting with Refunds — refunds to voters. 5. Gas-Managed Voting — fully optimized contra…
⚡10
📣 DivaTech is organizing a Tact competition tomorrow: https://t.me/tactlang/59471
⚡8
🎉 Misti 0.8 has just landed on NPM! ⚡️ More Detectors: New detectors to find possible optimizations introduced in Tact 1.6: SuboptimalSend, PreferBinaryReceiver, PreferSenderFunction, ImplicitOpcode and SuboptimalCellOperation. ⚙️ Improved Integrability: Standartized JSON output for smoother integration. 👩💻 LSP Actions Support: Misti now provides API for LSP code actions, introducing quickfix suggestions for some…
⚡12
🎉 Tact v1.6.5 is released! Back with another round of refinements! While we're working on many exciting things in the background, we're committed to fixing every bug that the community might discover so that Tact can provide a flawless developer experience. Furthermore, we now actively employ AI and large language model (LLM) fuzzing techniques, such as documentation-driven approaches where LLMs are given only the …
⚡9
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tact_kitchen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tact Kitchen” (@tact_kitchen), 518 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tact_kitchen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.