Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Таблицы Брадиса

@table_Bradis

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

497subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001488747063
TypeChannel
Username@table_Bradis
DescriptionГеопространственные записки
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/table_Bradis

Growth

4977 Aug 2026, 08:59 — 497 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 04:19 — 497 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 08:598 Aug 2026, 04:19
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 496–498 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 04:19497no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:59497first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 9 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.1%
avg views ÷ 497 subscribers
Avg views / post
135
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held18 (9 May 20267 August 2026)
Views total539
Reactions total20
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 04:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
185
Videos
35
Links
127

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
5m 55s
Average length
1m 11s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

100 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3333.0%
😁3333.0%
👍2828.0%
😢33.00%
🤮22.00%
😱11.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 09:23 UTC62 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @rsc_energiaVideo

Небольшая подборка кадров полёта первого космического оператора. 65 лет назад впервые человек снимал Землю с орбиты — Герман Титов работал с профессиональной кинокамерой «Конвас».

👍2

6 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC99 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня 65 лет полету Германа Титова Второй, не всегда второй. Одна из первых фотографий Земли сделанных Германом Титовым из космоса.

👍3

5 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC127 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

С воскресенья запоем читаю цикл книг Вадима Нестерова. Сказки пионерского детства. Только это не сказки а быль... о авторах моего детства. Есть, события которые были мне неизвестны. Скорее это история страны которой уже нет через призму детской литературы. На душе очень светло и очень грустно... Всем рекомендую к прочтению.

👍3

27 Jul 2026, 08:25 UTC251 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ровно 30 лет назад я взял в попутчики по жизни геодезию и картографию Потом уже были перья и тушь, рейсфедеры и кривоножки. ТМОГИ и фотограмметрия которая вам не пригодится 😂. Магия электронных тахеометров, и АРМИГ. Волшебство GPS — час постоял и никаких ходов... Блин, я древний))

👍9🔥3

13 Jul 2026, 14:53 UTC381 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🏴‍☠️ Заметил за собой и окружающими. Никому не нужен свежий автокад или цивил, кредо или нанокад. Всем хватает 3-5-летней давности релизов. Слово торрент для многих стало анахронизмом, как карета.

👍2

18 Jun 2026, 20:30 UTC438 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @northpolardaysVideo

Лоси лосями. Но иногда уставший и воспаленный от недосыпа, работы и нескольких глотков из фляжки разум выдаёт вот такие видения - сбежавший герб Челябинска в тайге на Урале. Когда надо заканчивать вахту и валить домой. Видео от читателей смежной профессии, что приходят перед нами и определяют наличие/отсутствие культурного слоя на месте будущих строек века и уникальных месторождений🤝

😁7

16 Jun 2026, 12:14 UTC319 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @genesismachinePhoto

Не совсем про часы, но интересно про странные визуализации. Диаграмма, показывающая, как выглядели бы различные лунные затмения при Землях разной формы. Иоганнес Буно, ок. 1711. Знаменитая гравюра немецкого теолога и педагога Иоганна Буно , опубликованная около 1711 года в книге "Универсальная география" На гравюре показано, как выглядела бы тень, отбрасываемая Землей на Луну во время затмения, если бы наша плане

🔥4

29 May 2026, 08:24 UTC506 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Практически утерянный тип людей...

😁6🔥3😢2

27 May 2026, 08:28 UTC477 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Всей семьей следим с февраля за ребятами, идут из Москвы во Владивосток пешком. Вышли после Нового Года, сейчас в Омске. Если хотите посмотреть на страну, на обычных людей, подписывайтесь.

👍1🔥1

27 May 2026, 08:25 UTC382 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @family_walk_rfVideo

Мы побывали на Омской картографической фабрике - предприятии с историей более 90 лет🏭 Очень интересно было увидеть изнутри, как рождаются те самые атласы дорог, карты и путеводители, которыми пользуются путешественники по всей стране 🗺️ Здесь всё начинается не с бумаги, а с огромной работы: точных данных, схем, выверки маршрутов и десятков этапов подготовки. И только потом появляется готовая карта, привычная нам вещ

🔥6

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @table_Bradis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Таблицы Брадиса” (@table_Bradis), 497 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/table_Bradis.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.