Channel
@ta_samaya_nan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
214subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002410479365 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ta_samaya_nan |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ta_samaya_nan |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 04:24 | 214 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 221 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:00 | 221 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (19 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,068 |
| Reactions total | 458 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 10:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
458 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5262995449266057136 | 129 | 28.2% | |
| custom 5427096842452088322 | 111 | 24.2% | |
| custom 5301098466380886090 | 87 | 19.0% | |
| custom 5465409380956537395 | 37 | 8.08% | |
| custom 5262495613857048302 | 36 | 7.86% | |
| custom 5465216339356451100 | 35 | 7.64% | |
| custom 5330360413575998292 | 18 | 3.93% | |
| custom 5298912903552843454 | 5 | 1.09% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 458reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ta_samaya_nan. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🚬🩵🩵🩵🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟😇 𖤐 ⋆｡°𝓕𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸𝓶: 𝓒𝓱𝓪𝓲𝓷𝓼𝓪𝔀 𝓜𝓪𝓷 ✩°｡⋆ 𖤐 𝓓𝓪𝓷𝓰𝓮𝓻𝓸𝓾𝓼𝓵𝔂 𝓬𝓵𝓸𝓼𝓮 𝓽𝓸 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓮𝓭𝓰𝓮. 𝓐 𝓼𝓲𝓵𝓮𝓷𝓬𝓮 𝓱𝓸𝓵𝓭𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝓯𝓪𝓻 𝓽𝓸𝓸 𝓶𝓾𝓬𝓱 𝓵𝓮𝓯𝓽 𝓾𝓷𝓼𝓪𝓲𝓭. 🪦✦ ───────────── ✦🪦 𖤐 𝕺пасно близко к краю. 𝕴 иногда молчание - единственное, что остаётся. Aki: @akkiwq
custom 530109846638088609020custom 526299544926605713619custom 542709684245208832216
Все хотела вам показать юбочку,которую я пошила🤍✨
custom 52629954492660571366custom 53303604135759982924custom 52624956138570483022
Мой лут с аниме дэйс 🩷✨🌹
custom 546540938095653739510custom 53010984663808860906custom 52629954492660571364
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 530109846638088609014custom 526249561385704830212custom 54270968424520883228custom 52989129035528434541
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 54270968424520883226custom 52629954492660571365custom 52624956138570483024custom 53303604135759982922custom 54654093809565373951
Ваш Лука 🤍
custom 530109846638088609011custom 54270968424520883228custom 52629954492660571366custom 53303604135759982921custom 54654093809565373951
Спасибики за звездочки 🤍✨ И добро пожаловать новым котикам:3
custom 52629954492660571368custom 53010984663808860906custom 54652163393564511004custom 54270968424520883222
🍐🅰️🍏🅰️ ℑ𝔣 𝔞𝔫𝔶𝔬𝔫𝔢 𝔠𝔞𝔩𝔩𝔰 𝔪𝔢 𝔰𝔥𝔬𝔯𝔱 𝔬𝔫𝔢 𝔪𝔬𝔯𝔢 𝔱𝔦𝔪𝔢, 𝔪𝔶 𝔰𝔠𝔶𝔱𝔥𝔢 𝔦𝔰 𝔤𝔬𝔦𝔫𝔤 𝔱𝔬 𝔢𝔵𝔭𝔩𝔞𝔦𝔫 𝔴𝔥𝔶 𝔱𝔥𝔞𝔱 𝔴𝔞𝔰 𝔞 𝔟𝔞𝔡 𝔦𝔡𝔢𝔞.🌞 𝔖𝔬𝔲𝔩 𝔈𝔞𝔱𝔢𝔯🤩🤩
custom 546540938095653739524custom 542709684245208832218custom 526299544926605713617custom 54652163393564511002
Хихи Решила распаковочку снять:3
custom 542709684245208832212custom 52629954492660571369custom 53010984663808860908
Не могу не поделиться своей радостью!♨️💗 Из Японии приехали мои новые Onitsuka Tiger и нежно-розовые Puma, а ещё целый пакет косметики из Donki♨️ И вот ещё новая фигурка Альбедо:3
custom 542709684245208832210custom 53010984663808860908custom 52989129035528434544custom 52629954492660571362
Мяу-напоминалочка🩷Котятки мьюшки не теряемся🙏 Оставьте пожалуйста ссылочки на свой канал✨
custom 52629954492660571363custom 54270968424520883223custom 52624956138570483022
🌟🌟💌🌟💌💌 🌟💌🌟💌🌟💌🌟🌟💄 🌑🌑𝓜𝓶𝓶-𝓶𝓹𝓱! 🎋🐾 (𝑾𝒐𝒖𝒍𝒅 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒆𝒏 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒉𝒊𝒏𝒐𝒃𝒖 𝒊𝒇 𝒔𝒉𝒆 𝒐𝒇𝒇𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒅 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒔𝒐𝒎𝒆 𝒔𝒘𝒆𝒆𝒕𝒔?) 𝓓𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓷 𝓢𝓵𝓪𝔂𝓮𝓻 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 #DemonSlayer #Nezuko #Shinobu
custom 526299544926605713614custom 526249561385704830212custom 53303604135759982929custom 53010984663808860905custom 54270968424520883221
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ta_samaya_nan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 121,323 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rin kospleit” (@ta_samaya_nan), 214 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ta_samaya_nan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.