Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 35 days, net +14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,136–1,156 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Sept 2026, 08:19
1,152
+1
5 Sept 2026, 01:41
1,151
+2
1 Sept 2026, 05:14
1,149
-2
29 Aug 2026, 04:44
1,151
-2
26 Aug 2026, 06:44
1,153
-1
22 Aug 2026, 21:45
1,154
+4
19 Aug 2026, 16:36
1,150
+2
16 Aug 2026, 21:03
1,148
+3
13 Aug 2026, 09:34
1,145
+5
10 Aug 2026, 06:01
1,140
+1
7 Aug 2026, 00:41
1,139
+1
6 Aug 2026, 13:01
1,138
no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:51
1,138
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 4 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
48 reactions across 12 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
25
52.1%
👍
23
47.9%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 October 2025 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌱 كلام رصين ومتين عن شريعة تعدد الزوجات قد يغير تفكير كل امرأة عاقلة..
وذكر الشيخ بأنه كم من امرأة عاقلة اغتبطت وفرحت بعد مدة من زواج زوجها بأخرى وصرحت بهذا
🎙 لفضيلة الشيخ /
#عبدالله_القصير رحمه الله
🔻رابط المقطع كاملا 🔻
https://youtu.be/8G57Wf3YwXo
🌿 التعدد اليوم ليس سهلا، ويحتاج لتحمّل من الرجل والمرأة ||
💡 الشيخ سالم بن سعد الطويل -حفظه الله-
┏━━━━━━━━━━━━┓
💡 واحة التعدد 💡
https://t.me/ta3addud/311
┗━━━━━━━━━━━━┛
🌱 محاضرة "فنون إدارة الحياة الزوجية"
لفضيلة الشيخ حمد العتيق،
[00:00] البداية
[01:25] عظمة عقد الزوجية ووصفه بـ "الميثاق الغليظ".
[01:49] كيد الشيطان وسعيه لإفساد العلاقة الزوجية والفرقة بين الزوجين.
⬇️ دوافع الإحسان في العلاقة الزوجية:
[03:00] الدافع الأول: امتثال أمر الله ورسوله واحتساب الأجر (حتى في اللقمة والنفقة).
[04:49] الدافع الثاني: العلم بأن الإحسان للطرف الآخر هو إحسان للنفس (هل جزاء الإحسا…
🌱 ما الذي يجب على الزوج أن يعدل فيه بين زوجاته ||
الشيخ د. عزيز بن فرحان العنزي
#للمقبلين_على_التعدد
#العدل
┏━━━━━━━━━━━━┓
💡 واحة التعدد 💡
https://t.me/ta3addud/595
┗━━━━━━━━━━━━┛
✍️قال العلَّامــة ابن باز- رحمه اللَّه تعالى:-
في تعدد النساء مع تحري العدل مصالح كثيرة وفوائد جمة: منها: عفة الرجل وإعفافه عدداً من النساء، ومنها: كفايته لهن وقيامه بمصالحهن، ومنها: كثرة النسل الذي يترتب عليه كثرة الأمة وقوتها وكثرة من يعبد الله، ومنها: مباهاة النبي ﷺ بهم الأمم يوم القيامة، إلى غير ذلك من المصالح الكثيرة التي يعرفها من يعظم الشريعة وينظر في محاسنها وحكمها وأسرارها وشدة حاجة العباد إليها بعين الرضا …
هل زواج كبار السن رفاهية… أم ضرورة؟
مع التقدم في العمر، يحتاج الإنسان — رجلًا كان أو امرأة — إلى الرفقة والسكن، خاصةً بعد وفاة أحد الزوجين أو ضعف القدرة الصحية والعاطفية بينهما.
ومع ذلك، يواجه كثير من كبار السن اعتراضًا من الأبناء بدافع العادات أو الخوف من الميراث أو “الكلام”.
لكن الشرع حسم الأمر بوضوح:
📌 فتوى اللجنة الدائمة للبحوث العلمية والإفتاء
عند سؤالهم: “هل للأبناء منع والدهم من الزواج؟”
قالوا:
“لا يجوز …
📝مقال || الحرب على التعدد
الحرب على التعدد ليست ناتجة عن غيرة النساء
بل غيرة النساء سلاح سُخّر في محاربة التعدد
🌿 التعدد محارب من قبل جهات منظمة تنفق الملايين لأجل القضاء عليه
🌿 التعدد شرعه أرحم الراحمين الذي هو أعلم بخلقه وبما يصلحهم وبما يحقق لهم أعلى المنافع وينجيهم من الشرور سواء فهموا تشريعه وحكمته أو لم تبلغ عقولهم فهم ذلك ولكن هذه المنظمات التي يرأسها أشخاص يعلنون الإلحاد والكفر بالأديان وأن الإسلام د…
❤8
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ta3addud. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
البيت السعيد للمتزوجين @thamar58500 · 96,609 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 August 2026
رسائل زوجية @axxxxa140 · 68,545 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💡واحة التعدد 💡” (@ta3addud), 1,152 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ta3addud.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.