Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

💡واحة التعدد 💡

@ta3addud

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,145subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001700892799
TypeChannel
Username@ta3addud
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ta3addud

Growth

1,1381,1451,141.56 August 2026 — 1,138 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,138 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,139 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,140 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,145 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,137–1,146 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:341,145+5
10 Aug 2026, 06:011,140+1
7 Aug 2026, 00:411,139+1
6 Aug 2026, 13:011,138no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:511,138first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 4 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.1%
avg views ÷ 1,145 subscribers
Avg views / post
357
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.265%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026
Posts held18 (4 October 202520 July 2026)
Views total713
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

48 reactions across 12 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2552.1%
👍2347.9%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 October 2025 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Jul 2026, 11:23 UTC377 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🌱 كلام رصين ومتين عن شريعة تعدد الزوجات قد يغير تفكير كل امرأة عاقلة.. وذكر الشيخ بأنه كم من امرأة عاقلة اغتبطت وفرحت بعد مدة من زواج زوجها بأخرى وصرحت بهذا 🎙 لفضيلة الشيخ / #عبدالله_القصير رحمه الله 🔻رابط المقطع كاملا 🔻 https://youtu.be/8G57Wf3YwXo

👍1

9 May 2026, 19:07 UTC≈1,120 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🌿 التعدد اليوم ليس سهلا، ويحتاج لتحمّل من الرجل والمرأة || 💡 الشيخ سالم بن سعد الطويل -حفظه الله- ┏━━━━━━━━━━━━┓ 💡 واحة التعدد 💡 https://t.me/ta3addud/311 ┗━━━━━━━━━━━━┛

👍4

8 May 2026, 06:16 UTC≈1,110 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

🌱 محاضرة "فنون إدارة الحياة الزوجية" لفضيلة الشيخ حمد العتيق، ​ [00:00] البداية ​[01:25] عظمة عقد الزوجية ووصفه بـ "الميثاق الغليظ". ​[01:49] كيد الشيطان وسعيه لإفساد العلاقة الزوجية والفرقة بين الزوجين. ⬇️ ​دوافع الإحسان في العلاقة الزوجية: ​[03:00] الدافع الأول: امتثال أمر الله ورسوله واحتساب الأجر (حتى في اللقمة والنفقة). ​[04:49] الدافع الثاني: العلم بأن الإحسان للطرف الآخر هو إحسان للنفس (هل جزاء الإحسا

3

8 May 2026, 05:34 UTC789 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

🌱 ما الذي يجب على الزوج أن يعدل فيه بين زوجاته || الشيخ د. عزيز بن فرحان العنزي #للمقبلين_على_التعدد #العدل ┏━━━━━━━━━━━━┓ 💡 واحة التعدد 💡 https://t.me/ta3addud/595 ┗━━━━━━━━━━━━┛

31 Mar 2026, 10:17 UTC≈1,220 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

🌱 ﴿ وَلَن تَسۡتَطِيعُوٓاْ أَن تَعۡدِلُواْ بَيۡنَ ٱلنِّسَآءِ وَلَوۡ حَرَصۡتُمۡ ﴾ || الشيخ زيد بن مسفر البحري #للمقبلين_على_التعدد #العدل ┏━━━━━━━━━━━━┓ 💡 واحة التعدد 💡 https://t.me/ta3addud/596 ┗━━━━━━━━━━━━┛

16 Dec 2025, 20:21 UTC≈2,130 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

✍️قال العلَّامــة ابن باز- رحمه اللَّه تعالى:- في تعدد النساء مع تحري العدل مصالح كثيرة وفوائد جمة: منها: عفة الرجل وإعفافه عدداً من النساء، ومنها: كفايته لهن وقيامه بمصالحهن، ومنها: كثرة النسل الذي يترتب عليه كثرة الأمة وقوتها وكثرة من يعبد الله، ومنها: مباهاة النبي ﷺ بهم الأمم يوم القيامة، إلى غير ذلك من المصالح الكثيرة التي يعرفها من يعظم الشريعة وينظر في محاسنها وحكمها وأسرارها وشدة حاجة العباد إليها بعين الرضا

👍10

13 Dec 2025, 08:33 UTC≈2,440 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

هل زواج كبار السن رفاهية… أم ضرورة؟ مع التقدم في العمر، يحتاج الإنسان — رجلًا كان أو امرأة — إلى الرفقة والسكن، خاصةً بعد وفاة أحد الزوجين أو ضعف القدرة الصحية والعاطفية بينهما. ومع ذلك، يواجه كثير من كبار السن اعتراضًا من الأبناء بدافع العادات أو الخوف من الميراث أو “الكلام”. لكن الشرع حسم الأمر بوضوح: 📌 فتوى اللجنة الدائمة للبحوث العلمية والإفتاء عند سؤالهم: “هل للأبناء منع والدهم من الزواج؟” قالوا: “لا يجوز

2

11 Dec 2025, 10:10 UTC≈1,570 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

📝 مقال || رسالة إلى الزوجة الثانية ┏━━━━━━━━━━━━┓ 💡 واحة التعدد 💡 https://t.me/ta3addud/448 ┗━━━━━━━━━━━━┛

2

4 Dec 2025, 03:30 UTC≈1,400 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @binbaz1420Photo

#سؤال_وجواب هل التعدد سبب للمشاكل

14 Nov 2025, 07:41 UTC≈1,640 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

📝مقال || الحرب على التعدد الحرب على التعدد ليست ناتجة عن غيرة النساء بل غيرة النساء سلاح سُخّر في محاربة التعدد 🌿 التعدد محارب من قبل جهات منظمة تنفق الملايين لأجل القضاء عليه 🌿 التعدد شرعه أرحم الراحمين الذي هو أعلم بخلقه وبما يصلحهم وبما يحقق لهم أعلى المنافع وينجيهم من الشرور سواء فهموا تشريعه وحكمته أو لم تبلغ عقولهم فهم ذلك ولكن هذه المنظمات التي يرأسها أشخاص يعلنون الإلحاد والكفر بالأديان وأن الإسلام د

8

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ta3addud. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 621,707 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“💡واحة التعدد 💡” (@ta3addud), 1,145 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ta3addud.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.