Channel
@t4allib
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
792subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001830690839 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @t4allib |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/t4allib |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:19 | 792 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 795 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:22 | 795 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
74 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 61 | 82.4% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 10.8% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 5.41% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 1.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2025 to 29 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Когда шейха Мухаммада 'Авваму, да сохранит его Аллах, спросили, что он думает о том, чтобы объединить мазхабы и чтобы люди следовали только одному из них, он ответил: السَّعي في توحيد المذاهب وحمل الناس على واحد منها جنون أو ضلال! «Стремление объединить мазхабы и заставить людей следовать одному из них есть безумие и заблуждение!».
❤4
https://youtu.be/cgW9jH7kI60?si=QODVvv5BH6sHAUuc
Женщина в Рамадан собирает награду за наградой: награду за свой пост, награду за заботу о доме и награду за угощение постящихся (ифтар), дома стоит на терпении женщин и их самоотдаче. О Аллах, благослави наших матерей.
❤3
Video, posted without a caption
❤4
«Кто говорит о том, чего не знает, тот начинает сомневаться и в том, что знает». — Шейх Адхам аль-Асими, да хранит его Аллах и принесёт через него пользу.
❤1
Video, posted without a caption
💔4
Шейх Абдуль-Фаттах Яфии (да сохранит его Аллах) пишет в Facebook: سمعت تكفيريا متطرفا جاهلا جهلا مركبا ينسب إلى الإشاعرة ما لم يقولوه ثم كفرهم بناء على ما كذب به عليهم. والمصيبة أنه إمام وخطيب مسجد .. تكفير المسلمين انحراف كبير ومنزلق خطير وطامة عظمى يؤدي إلى ما لا تحمد عقباه .. ويجب على وزارة الأوقاف والجهات المعنية والأهالي منع التكفيريين من اعتلاء منابر المساجد «Я слышал, как один невежественный такфирист-экстре…
❤6
https://youtu.be/ptHBwszybXE?si=mNBIPjExS_iEjpm6
❤3
Имам аль-ГIазали (Да помилует его Аллах) сказал: Ложь является самым страшным из смертных грехов. Если люди услышат о твоей лжи, ты потеряешь доверие, и никто не будет верить тебе. Ты упадёшь в чужих глазах. Если желаешь Понять всю низость лжи, подумай над тем, насколько раздражает тебя ложь других людей, и как они низко падают в твоих глазах. Это является действенный способом для того, чтобы понять Свои недостатки.…
❤2
О, Господи! Если грехов моих так много, что нет им счёта — То ведь я знаю: Твоё прощение — ещё больше. Если надеется на Тебя лишь блгадетель — То к кому прибегнет грешник, и у кого просит защиты? Я взываю к Тебе, мой Господь, смиренно, как Ты повелел, Но если Ты отвергнешь мои руки — кто тогда будет милостив? Нет у меня к Тебе иного пути, кроме надежды, На красоту Твоего прощения — и то, что я мусульманин.
❤5👍5
Photo, posted without a caption
Бид'а в Исламе: Истина между крайностями | Шейх Ибрахим аль-Муршидий Что имел в виду Пророк ﷺ, сказав: «Каждое новшество — заблуждение»? Означает ли это, что любое нововведение — это грех? Или существуют исключения? В этом видео подробно разбираются слова таких великих имамов, как ан-Навави, Ибн Хаджар, Ибн Абдуль-Барр, Ибн Таймия и других. Мы рассматриваем примеры хороших новшеств — как намаз духа в джамаате, тарав…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @t4allib. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Записи студента” (@t4allib), 792 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/t4allib.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.