Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

t1modev

@t1modev

Not marked by Telegram, checked 13 August 20264 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,295subscribers

-172 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002231417839
TypeChannel
Usernames@europe_top @t1modev @toncoke @vertus
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/t1modev

Growth

19,29519,46719,3816 August 2026 — 19,467 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,467 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,466 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,463 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,463 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,450 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,442 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,442 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,435 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,435 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,432 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,420 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,420 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,419 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,407 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,390 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,390 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,381 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,381 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,357 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,357 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,357 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,353 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,343 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,337 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,332 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,332 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,317 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,315 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,314 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,310 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,295 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,295 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,295 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
34 measurements spanning 7 days, net -172. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,269–19,493 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:1819,295no change
13 Aug 2026, 01:0319,295no change
12 Aug 2026, 22:2619,295-15
12 Aug 2026, 13:0719,310-4
12 Aug 2026, 05:4819,314-1
12 Aug 2026, 00:2319,315-2
11 Aug 2026, 23:5719,317-15
11 Aug 2026, 10:5519,332no change
11 Aug 2026, 08:2719,332-5
11 Aug 2026, 03:0119,337-6
10 Aug 2026, 22:4319,343-10
10 Aug 2026, 11:2219,353-4
10 Aug 2026, 09:3619,357no change
10 Aug 2026, 03:5619,357no change
10 Aug 2026, 01:4119,357-24
9 Aug 2026, 07:5419,381no change
9 Aug 2026, 07:5119,381-9
9 Aug 2026, 01:1119,390no change
9 Aug 2026, 00:5519,390-17
8 Aug 2026, 11:0419,407first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 November 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 15s
Average length
38s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

541 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍌16129.8%
10920.1%
🫡7012.9%
🐳6912.8%
🔥5510.2%
👾264.81%
🥰264.81%
😁254.62%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 541reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 November 2024 to 19 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
126
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 20 we hold a reading for · 55%
Most on one post
103
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @t1modev. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 November 2024 to 19 May 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 May 2025, 14:44 UTC≈4,200 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🖥 Y Combinator Summer RFS is out 🤖And every single one is focused on AI No social apps, no D2C brands, no lifestyle fintech This season, it’s about foundational tech — and AI is the core. YC isn’t chasing a trend They’re doubling down on what they believe will define the next decade if you’re serious about the future - you’re already late without AI in the mix 🙉

28 Apr 2025, 17:55 UTC≈6,010 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

About 117 billion humans have ever lived Yet only a few hundred truly shaped the course of history Maybe evolution doesn’t care about the majority Maybe it’s always been about creating the next spark The question is - what if AI becomes the next one?

11

5 Jan 2025, 22:16 UTC≈25,500 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://t.me/theStarSwapBot/start

14

1 Jan 2025, 00:07 UTC≈26,300 views20 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

20

1 Jan 2025, 00:05 UTC≈19,400 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @yeartimeprogress

░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ 0%

🥰4

31 Dec 2024, 20:44 UTC≈18,600 views36 reactions9 Starsread 12 August 2026

Wishing everyone in 2025 to keep chasing their dreams and moving forward, full speed ahead. Stay focused, stay determined, and never stop striving for more 🤝⚡️ Happy New Year, yall! 🎁

36

19 Dec 2024, 22:53 UTC≈21,600 views35 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

Are you winning, son? 🎁

🔥35

15 Dec 2024, 23:57 UTC≈19,000 views18 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

Pavel Durov [Flashgamm 2012] Advices to developers of VK games. I test games, no doubt But none of them make me want to open them every day. However, I would focus on one thing Nowadays, many studios run multiple projects in parallel, launching one thing after another, hoping something will succeed I would choose one direction and develop that “mine” to the very end Just like we did with the social network VKo

🔥18

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @t1modev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 585,527 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Hodlman Crypto
@inHodlman · 162,409
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
Grinder AI
@inGrinder · 153,898
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“t1modev” (@t1modev), 19,295 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/t1modev.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.