Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ˗ˏˋ𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑎´ˎ˗

Channel

˗ˏˋ𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑎´ˎ˗

@t1amorna

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

268subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002859316067
TypeChannel
Username@t1amorna
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/t1amorna

Growth

268269268.57 August 2026 — 269 subscribers8 August 2026 — 269 subscribers16 August 2026 — 268 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 268–269 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 17:27268-1
8 Aug 2026, 08:49269no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:46269first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
72.6%
avg views ÷ 268 subscribers
Avg views / post
195
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
23.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held17 (15 July 20263 August 2026)
Views total1,167
Reactions total268
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 08:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 18s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

736 reactions across 17 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53867581015861884329112.4%
custom 5359812765261251592729.78%
custom 5267485472501834873719.65%
custom 5386853436975262155709.51%
custom 5267131378218079434689.24%
custom 5388955243646063082587.88%
custom 5305318761375489014516.93%
custom 5386822410131515080466.25%
custom 5388644395388018162456.11%
custom 5393571341351814093375.03%
custom 5388942805420776989364.89%
custom 5386508980598120242344.62%
custom 5388728151545258315212.85%
custom 5424604713448404345141.90%
custom 5425114530361403594131.77%
custom 526751503476173643150.679%
custom 525387078695076602440.543%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 736reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 17 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
20
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @t1amorna. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC89 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @stellalanissVideo

𝐕𝐀𝐋𝐄𝐍𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐀 𝐂𝐀𝐕𝐀𝐋𝐋𝐀𝐑𝐎 💅 🤩 𝓆𝓊ℯℯ𝓃 🤩 🤩🤩 🤩🤩🥹 Облегчение нахлынуло меня когда черный лимузин «Мерседес» с тонированными стеклами, наконец, остановился перед рестораном, и Вэл вышла, такая же высокая и царственная, как всегда 𝐀𝐕 ⭐ 𝒷

custom 538675810158618843215custom 53889428054207769896custom 53865089805981202425custom 53886443953880181621custom 53887281515452583151

31 Jul 2026, 10:49 UTC190 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026

💌 У тебя новое сообщение! Тина, сколько языков ты знаешь? 💜 :: 4, родной язык, украинский,русский и немецкий 💌 У тебя новое сообщение! Сколько лет уже играешь в клуб романтики? Какая любимая история и фаворит? 💜 💜:: 31 декабря будет как 7 лет 😂 я в этом плане уже старичок можно сказать. а насчет истории и фаворита, если именно самой любимой, то это "Легенда Ивы" и Кадзу. сколько бы лет не прошло, ни о

custom 538675810158618843212custom 53889552436460630828custom 53868534369752621556custom 53865089805981202422custom 53868224101315150802custom 53886443953880181622custom 53887281515452583152custom 53889428054207769892

30 Jul 2026, 18:49 UTC195 views47 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

🤩🤩🤩😑 :: я никогда не думала, что скажу это. но в фандоме Коры есть вещь, которая реально делает мне больно, это Нино. а точнее, его фанаты. на протяжении нескольких месяцев я наблюдаю за тем, как фанаты Нино пытаются как-то его возвысить, при этом стыдя других персонажей. и я правда не понимаю зачем. зачем вы постоянно сравниваете его с другими, приплетаете Луку, Ромеро и остальных? из-за таких действий многие люди

custom 538675810158618843218custom 538682241013151508010custom 538685343697526215510custom 53935713413518140934custom 53887281515452583152custom 53889428054207769892custom 53886443953880181621

30 Jul 2026, 18:31 UTC170 views45 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🤩🤩💜 :: логика просто существует 💜как Наряд не посмел идти и спасать Серафину?! какие они ужасные против 💜ну Сэм идиот, что пошел спасать Серафину 💜 :: мне просто интересно, когда люди уже определятся чего они хотели, и просто отстанут от семьи Мионе, чтобы потом самим не ныть?

custom 538675810158618843214custom 53868534369752621557custom 53886443953880181627custom 53889552436460630825custom 53865089805981202424custom 53887281515452583153custom 53935713413518140933custom 53868224101315150801

27 Jul 2026, 18:42 UTC225 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🤩 🤩🤒 :: джаники, мне стало интересно, какое впечатление обо мне складывается, глядя на мои эдиты? мол какой вайб от них и от меня веет не знаю почему, но вдруг стало очень интересно и какое мнение по поводу моих эдитов

custom 538864439538801816212custom 53865089805981202428custom 53889552436460630827custom 53889428054207769895custom 53868534369752621554custom 53867581015861884321

27 Jul 2026, 11:59 UTC298 views73 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

🤩 𝐑𝐘𝐀𝐍 & 𝐂𝐀𝐑𝐀 🤩🤩🥰 ⌦ ❝Принцесса и чудовище - вот кем мы были❞

custom 539357134135181409325custom 538682241013151508015custom 538895524364606308212custom 53868534369752621555custom 53865089805981202424custom 53887281515452583154custom 53886443953880181623custom 53889428054207769893

18 Jul 2026, 20:56 UTC323 views63 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩 𝐊𝐀𝐈 & 𝐌𝐈𝐋𝐋𝐄𝐑 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩#𝗁𝗈𝗍𝖼𝗈𝗎𝗉𝗅𝖾 💜 ִֶָ. ..𓂃 ࣪ ִֶָ🪽་༘࿐ ⌞— Ты флиртуешь со мной, Монтгомери? — С тех пор, как мы встретились. Ты собираешься флиртовать в ответ? — Миллер, — перебивает Исайя, прежде чем я успеваю услышать ответ Кая. — Можно мне пригласить тебя на танец?⌝ ᥫ᭡.ִֶָ𓂃

custom 538675810158618843222custom 538895524364606308213custom 538685343697526215511custom 53868224101315150804custom 53865089805981202423custom 53889428054207769893custom 53935713413518140933custom 53886443953880181622

18 Jul 2026, 17:59 UTC286 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🤩🤩🤩🤩 :: теперь на фиолетовых вайбах двигаемся всем спасибо кто проголосовал 💘

custom 538685343697526215513custom 53886443953880181628custom 53868224101315150805custom 53889552436460630825custom 53865089805981202423custom 53887281515452583153

18 Jul 2026, 17:58 UTC268 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩 💜💜🤩💜 🤩 ˗ˏˋ 𝑔𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑝 𝑔𝑖𝑟𝑙 ´ˎ˗ 🤩

custom 538894280542077698914custom 53868224101315150807custom 53886443953880181626custom 53865089805981202424custom 53887281515452583153custom 53868534369752621552

18 Jul 2026, 17:56 UTC249 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟🌟 💜💜𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑎 🤩💜˗ˏˋ 𝑡𝑖𝑘 𝑡𝑜𝑘 ´ˎ˗ 💜˗ˏˋ 𝑡𝑖𝑘 𝑡𝑜𝑘 𝟸.𝟶 ´ˎ˗ 💜˗ˏˋ 𝑙𝑖𝑓𝑒 ´ˎ˗ 💜˗ˏˋ 𝑝𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡´ˎ˗ 💜˗ˏˋ 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚 ´ˎ˗

custom 538685343697526215512custom 53889552436460630828custom 53867581015861884327custom 53886443953880181623custom 52674854725018348732custom 53868224101315150802custom 52675150347617364311custom 53865089805981202421

18 Jul 2026, 16:06 UTC190 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @theoutfit111Video

𝑻𝑯𝑬 𝑶𝑼𝑻𝑭𝑰𝑻’𝑺 𝑺𝑬𝑪𝑶𝑵𝑫 𝑮𝑬𝑵𝑬𝑹𝑨𝑻𝑰𝑶𝑵 🤩🤩 😈Чего у Наряда было предостаточно, так это денег.😈 😈Нам не нужды посторонние, чтобы прославить Наряд.😈 😈Возможно, нам придется драться грязно, но так даже веселее.😈

custom 526713137821807943416custom 53598127652612515928custom 54251145303614035945custom 54246047134484043452custom 52538707869507660241custom 52674854725018348731custom 52675150347617364311

17 Jul 2026, 12:15 UTC212 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🤩🤩 🤩 :: самая фатальная ошибка Рины Кент (для меня) написать в книге Джуда и Вайолет, что Престон жив из-за того, что я знала об этом факте. мне действительно не так грустно было. хотя страдания Маркуса, это такая боль 😭😭😭

custom 526748547250183487318custom 535981276526125159211custom 52671313782180794348custom 53053187613754890146custom 54246047134484043451

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @t1amorna. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 350,134 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“˗ˏˋ𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑎´ˎ˗” (@t1amorna), 268 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/t1amorna.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.