23 Jun 2026, 08:36 UTC294 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo
@httpstmedouya11888 小豆芽黑车下榜，两幅面孔，六百六十六
Channel
怡红院黑车/雷报榜
@szyhyhclb
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
100subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003942136974 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @szyhyhclb |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 1 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/szyhyhclb |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 100 | +2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 98 | first reading |
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 1 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
8 May 2026, 08:55 UTC571 viewsread 14 August 2026
🌻🌻🌻【各位老师/狼友请注意】 此白嫖畜生再次出现，虽然改了用户名，但是ID无法更改，ID为：6134122726 ，当前使用户名为：@jklandts 请各位擦亮双眼，切勿上当。
2 May 2026, 11:30 UTC583 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo
🗂️ 1条车评，综合评分3.75 好评 0% |中评 0% |差评 100% 人照 5 |态度 3 |环境 4 🧸 老师名称： 雨晴 📍 老师地区： #姑苏区 💰 服务价格： #600P #1200PP 🏷 老师服务： #69 #舌吻 #胸推 🗝 老师标签： #御姐 ☎️ 联系老师： 代聊 下榜 ✍️ 评价老师： 点击评价 点击进入交流群
2 May 2026, 11:30 UTC452 viewsread 14 August 2026
代聊属实，下榜了
1 May 2026, 12:28 UTC446 viewsread 14 August 2026
【怡红院雷报】： https://t.me/SZYHYA 【学生留名】：didi火箭 【出击时间】：5/2 【老师艺名】：雨晴 【地区】：苏州平江锐 【出击消费】：600P 【过程】：妥妥黑车一个 600P服务只有口做 其他服务要额外加钱 问老师什么都不知道 货不对板 言语冲突 明显是鸡头代聊 【联系方式】：@suzhousyq 报告只供参考，请提交出击记录。
1 May 2026, 12:28 UTCviews —
怡红院黑车/雷报榜 pinned «【怡红院雷报】： https://t.me/SZYHYA 【学生留名】： 【出击时间】： 【老师艺名】： 【地区】： 【出击消费】： 【过程】： 【联系方式】： 报告只供参考，请提交出击记录。»
1 May 2026, 12:27 UTC407 views0 reactionsread 14 August 2026
【怡红院雷报】： https://t.me/SZYHYA 【学生留名】： 【出击时间】： 【老师艺名】： 【地区】： 【出击消费】： 【过程】： 【联系方式】： 报告只供参考，请提交出击记录。
1 May 2026, 12:27 UTCviews —
Channel photo updated
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @szyhyhclb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“怡红院黑车/雷报榜” (@szyhyhclb), 100 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/szyhyhclb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.