Channel
@szlsbb
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
21,559subscribers
+211 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002094277915 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @szlsbb |
| Description | 收录深圳雷师。分享被骗经验，提高反诈骗意识 投稿 @LCZ688 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/szlsbb |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 21,559 | +35 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 21,524 | +34 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 21,490 | +20 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:11 | 21,470 | +35 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:51 | 21,435 | +28 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 21,407 | +40 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:58 | 21,367 | +19 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 21,348 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:38 | 21,348 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (3 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 59,030 |
| Reactions total | 102 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 05:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
102 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 53 | 52.0% | |
| ❤ | 43 | 42.2% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 3.92% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 1.96% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 102reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
伤兵留名： k 雷师花名：如意 踩雷时间：2024-07-07 颜值身材： 严重不符，高p战士 踩雷详情：我他妈的从光明区坐一个多小时来南山这边，结果我一进门让我坐旁边，但是这个胸只有A罩杯，说不定比A还小，我靠，这衣服连沟都看不到、我说不做了，直接开骂，兄弟们真憋屈这个东西要1300，我靠，还要提前出来了，幸亏我上个礼拜找过这种老师，遇到这种人直接一点胃口都没有，兄弟们真憋屈1300，我靠 雷师TG @ruyi_520168
❤8
文明的朝阳，不再徘徊迷惘； 路途坎坷，不改初心； 奔向美好远方。 守护财产安全，谨防雷师骗子。 https://t.me/shlsbb
伤兵留名：bigCock 雷师花名：兔兔琦 踩雷时间：8-2 所在城市：深圳南山 踩雷支出：1300 踩雷经历：首先，人照8分，去的时候基本上没化妆或者淡妆，很嫩，这点没话说，宽松T恤下面身材也很哇塞 然后就是不满的点，首先，课表上写的服务基本没有，只有一个舌吻，还很抗拒，想女上但直接拒绝，如果说这个还说的过去，其他服务基本没有，69非常抗拒，调情也基本没有，想亲一下不小心亲到了脸还大声喊了起来，差点给我喊萎了 求嫩可以，但情绪价值一点没有 雷师TG @nsxq777
❤15
伤兵留名：dyikbgm uotbk 骗子花名：鹿鹿 被骗时间：8-5 城市坐标：深圳 龙华 被骗损失：1532 被骗经历： 晚上在群里，看到lulu有空。于是想要约她P。看到她主页有一个活动（766盲盒活动）问了一嘴。 766骰子盲盒。（盲盒的规则） 发送口令红包🧧，766可以抽奖一次。 如果骰子🎲的点数为1️⃣ 2️⃣ 3️⃣ 4️⃣那么口令红包766则享受原价1000的1P。 骰子的点数为5️⃣。则可享受原价1800的PP 如果骰子的点数为6️⃣。则可享受4000元下午茶。3小时不限次数。 说完规则，他会让你骰子。我骰了一个6️⃣。他说不算数，只有领取口令红包，骰子才算数。 我就上头想着不会亏，766最少就是1P。于是我给他发了一个口令红包。 她领取完口令红包。他说让我重新骰。领完红包点数才算数。 我又骰一个1️⃣。他说我运气不好。我心想算了1P就1P。但是她说有事，不想接1P。至少PP才会接。如果骰子次数多了。可以囤…
🤣40❤4🔥1
伤兵留名：volcano 雷师花名：瞌睡虫 城市坐标：深圳龙岗南联 踩雷详情：第一次罚站近20分钟，然后我走了 第二次我换了号约，依旧罚站20分钟。 雷师TG @ksc1314520
👍2
🪧赞助广告 ❤️名师榜: @sz520 ❤️聊天群: @sz1314 👩🎓郑重承诺: 高质量/真老师/真学生/活跃社区，若您在【深圳学院】联系的老师货不对板，被骗定金，群主: @sz333 担保赔付！每月赞助万元出击费🧧 立即加入 👆
👍1
🤥深圳94·尊享、全裸SPA 😀😀😀😀😀😕😀😀 服务内容: 消费低至，398起 基础保健，摸鲍、舔鲍、舔棍、波推，真胸调情，丝足诱惑，毛扫毛推，美女划船，指尖调情，360 度胸推臀推，刮痧过水，舌尖漫游，69 式，真舌毒龙，倒挂金钩，穿孔桥，温水回笼、海底捞🈷️、高山流水💦等 #会所 #商k 现场选妃：😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 评论区有照片，任挑任选，不满意下一批，换到满意为止，或者喜欢什么类型告知🥵🥰，帮君挑选喜欢类型😀😀😀😀 预约方式😳 ❤️TG：@SZ9492 靠谱小澜放心咨询 🤖双向：@szsz01_bot 🔗频道：https://t.me/SZzw6 😀😀😀 商k频道：https://t.me/Chnsz3 24 小时免费停车，免费过夜，无隐藏消费 营业时间：中午 12 点到凌晨 5 点半
❤2👍1
伤兵留名： 蓝胖子 雷师花名：KK 踩雷时间：2026-08-03 踩雷支出：800 颜值身材： 8分像 踩雷详情：出击提前到半小时，然后楼下等到过了我约的时间才弄好让我上去，进门啥话也不说等着给💰。以下是和代聊反馈的内容： 不针对个人，仅说交易，你们真的有点问题，进门女孩摆个死鱼脸，一直就是哦，那怎么，哦。然后我给你发消息，你这边没回我说先做，她说等一下，然后坐那里搞手机。完事5.45左右给我说她约了别人要给我退钱让我走。在这之前我就说了我是请假过来的，可以先做，等你回消息，到这里她说这个点约了别人，我提前半小时到的，上去洗完澡给我说约的别人让我走，我火大正常吧，我原本是说服务好加个p，这个也是和你说好的但是你删记录死无对证了，然后你们说没得加了，这个我也没追究。然后过程中一点声音没有，一插就说疼，我又不大，一做就跟杀猪一样在哪喊，感觉像被人打了在哭的。反正全程一句话没有，就一直在啊，她就一躺脸子一甩，我真的第一次遇到。我从头…
❤12
伤兵留名：佚名 骗子花名：龙华丢丢 被骗时间：8.2 所在城市：深圳龙华 被骗损失：100 被骗经历：前几个月有在开课，水友去过推荐说还可以。最近看到重新开课想约，问了下要给定金，发口令领了后发个定位。等人快到了，再问就删对话拉黑。最近还在骗人，各位小心。 骗子TG：@diudiu1121
❤1
Telegram必备的搜索引擎，极搜JISOU帮你精准找到，想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_7878264246
伤兵留名：02 骗子花名：小七酱 被骗时间：7.15 所在城市：深圳坪山 被骗损失：3000 被骗经历：一开始先骗定金，过程中经常发图让你相信，到了楼下就先让你交完课费上楼，交完最后还说要3000押金后面会退，也是意识到被骗，一开始楼下交课费已经有警惕了，但我大老远的跑过来，也是赌一下，毫不意外，最后也是人也没看到 骗子TG @Hxiaoqijiang
🤣13❤1🔥1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @szlsbb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 604,438 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“深圳雷师榜” (@szlsbb), 21,559 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/szlsbb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.