Channel
@szguoer1314520
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
527subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 26 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003648851307 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @szguoer1314520 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 7 April 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 26 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/szguoer1314520 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 13:22 | 527 | no change |
| 26 Sept 2026, 12:47 | 527 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (7 April 2026 – 25 September 2026) |
| Views total | 495 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
39 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤮 | 15 | 38.5% | |
| 🌚 | 12 | 30.8% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 12.8% | |
| 💩 | 4 | 10.3% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 7.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【时间】：2026-05-11 【老师】：果果 【留名】：柯达（六代） 【人照】：8 【服务】：8 【态度】：8 【环境】：8 【综合】：8 【过程】：老师属于服务性老师，本人觉得真人更有女人味耐看型，符合课表，全程酥酥麻麻的本人比较敏感的，服务态度非常好，说话很温柔，内容很多，从头到尾都在做，没有偷懒，值得推荐，绝不踩雷，喜欢服务性老师的可以放心冲 【优点】：服务好 【缺点】：无
❤1
回来了😘😘
腿摔伤了，修养3月，回来发朋友圈
❤2
最近休息，请勿跑空
File, posted without a caption
今天开课
❤1
谢谢小哥满意的评价😘😘
🤮1
Photo, posted without a caption
🤮2💩1
【时间】：2026-05-08 【老师】：果果 【留名】：buzhidaojiaosmmingzi 【人照】：8 【服务】：10 【态度】：10 【环境】：8 【综合】：9 【过程】：老早就中了工兵券，但是遇上老师红休，一直等到现在，约好时间后上楼过程中有点小意外但还是安全抵达，进门后老师穿着裙子真空迎接，应该是红休结束的原因，刚进门就直接贴了上来抱着就开始啃，洗澡略过毕竟一个人洗，边擦干边开始口，知道我喜欢深喉口了好久，上床后开始服务，服务很到位课表上有的全都做了但是我不喜欢毒龙就没要，在床上口的很舒服不喊停就不带停的。等老师下面泛滥就带套进入，那自然是女上起手，然后换了传教士、后入式等等，老师一点不耐烦都没有十分配合。一边艹一边🐍一边揉着大奶子，简直不要太爽了，最后还是选择传教士出货，很棒的一次出击，值得再次回味 【优点】：服务很热情，姿势随意更换非常听话，口活儿也很爽 【缺点】：浴室有一点小不能一起洗，🛏略矮，有点不好发挥
❤1🌚1💩1🤮1
明天开课啦😘😘
【时间】：2026-05-01 【老师】：果果 【留名】：doniclau 【人照】：7 【服务】：9 【态度】：9 【环境】：8 【综合】：8.25 【过程】：服务非常标准会所服务，很给力，亮点是洗完澡出来老师擦身子同时口了起来，很不错的体验 老师本人要比照片耐看 但是确实不是嫩妹，服务型老师 【优点】：服务态度好，很全面 【缺点】：年纪有点了
🤮3
不能及时回消息哦
🌚1💩1🤮1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @szguoer1314520. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“果儿” (@szguoer1314520), 527 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/szguoer1314520.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.