Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Системный Характер

Channel

Системный Характер

@systemcharacter

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

45subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003122776383
TypeChannel
Username@systemcharacter
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/systemcharacter

Growth

4345447 August 2026 — 43 subscribers10 August 2026 — 43 subscribers21 August 2026 — 45 subscribers7 August 202621 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 14 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 43–45 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 18:3745+2
10 Aug 2026, 16:4643no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:0643first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
96.7%
avg views ÷ 45 subscribers
Avg views / post
43.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held17 (10 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total87
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

35 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1028.6%
🔥925.7%
😁514.3%
❤‍🔥411.4%
👍25.71%
💯25.71%
12.86%
🗿12.86%
😐12.86%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC36 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Вчера при проведении собеседования получил невероятно простой и одновременно исчерпывающий ответ — самостоятельность.

❤‍🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC51 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

📚 Обновление бота "Моя библиотека" • Word, TXT и Markdown — поддержка форматов, читайте не только книги • Поиск по тексту внутри книги • В режиме чтения: оглавление, размер шрифта, тёмная и сепия темы • Звук и вибро эффекты — листание, отклик даже на беззвучном (для смартфонов) • UI улучшения: блик, параллакс, книги крупнее, % прочитанного Пришли файл боту и читай прямо в Telegram @myshelfreader_bot @myshelfreader

❤‍🔥21😐1

31 Jul 2026, 19:09 UTC73 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

15 собеседований — итоги Пару кандидатов говорили про вовлеченность в команде, хорошие навыки общения (следующий мета-вопрос — как определить что сотрудник реально вовлечен, а не использует НЛП, чтобы создавать «видимость деятельности»). Еще никто не предложил хотя бы что то похожее из списка ниже: проактивное вовлечение в цели и задачи бизнеса в внедрением в более ответственные процессы, предложения по улучшению

2🔥2

24 Jul 2026, 16:14 UTC98 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Но локально и на какой то промежуток времени, пока не «вырастут»

1

24 Jul 2026, 16:00 UTC89 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Также будет наблюдаться сильная инфляция UI/UX систем и в целом кратно снизится их значимость. Потому что: 1. Никого уже не удивишь 3D анимацией на сайте 2. Где тут ценность? 3. Агент сходит за тебя на сайт.

1

24 Jul 2026, 15:57 UTC84 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

В будущем рынок завоюют люди, которые будут создавать продукты без темных паттернов во благо пользователей/потребителей. А также откажутся от «деструктивных» рекомендательных систем.

1

22 Jul 2026, 19:01 UTC91 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Сегодня проводил собеседование. Придумал следующий вопрос для проверки софтовой части: Представим, что ты руководитель и тебе нужно принять решение о повышении джуна (перформанс ревью), который использует ИИ в работе, при этом использование ИИ одобряется руководством и внедряется процессы команды. По каким критериям, кроме как качество артефактов*, ты будешь его оценивать? Артефакт — осязаемый продукт или побочный

1🔥1

21 Jul 2026, 09:47 UTC71 viewsread 10 August 2026

Скоро один очень жирный и важный апдейт. Держу в курсе. Если есть предложения/пожелания/жалобы — пишите в комментарии Пока нас тут немного

17 Jul 2026, 08:43 UTC85 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Распространите. Во благо борьбы с корпоративным нейрослопом. Системный характер. Подписаться.

😁2

17 Jul 2026, 08:28 UTC81 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Как вы относитесь к ИИ-картинкам с несуществующими людьми и локациями в рекламе и на сайтах компаний?

  1. Скорее плюс, компания идет в ногу со временем5%
  2. Не влияет на доверие5%
  3. Смущает, но на доверие не влияет48%
  4. Снижает доверие к компании19%
  5. Снижает доверие к качеству продукта43%

The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

👍2

14 Jul 2026, 14:12 UTC64 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Хороший результат с учетом того, что трафик почти не нагонялся. В предыдущем посте забыл упомянуть, что доступа к вашим книгам и документам нет — ни в какую промежуточную БД они не сгружаются, всё хранится в вашем диалоге с ботом @myshelfreader_bot @myshelfreader_bot @myshelfreader_bot

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @systemcharacter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Jul 2026, 08:28 UTCAnonymous Poll21 voters

Как вы относитесь к ИИ-картинкам с несуществующими людьми и локациями в рекламе и на сайтах компаний?

  1. Скорее плюс, компания идет в ногу со временем5%
  2. Не влияет на доверие5%
  3. Смущает, но на доверие не влияет48%
  4. Снижает доверие к компании19%
  5. Снижает доверие к качеству продукта43%

The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Системный Характер” (@systemcharacter), 45 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/systemcharacter.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.