Channel
@sysoev_ai
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
35subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002554114723 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sysoev_ai |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sysoev_ai |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:08 | 35 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 36 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 35 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:53 | 35 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
48 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 34 | 70.8% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 14.6% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 8.33% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 4.17% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 2.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 19 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Забавно, но «говорящие машины» появились задолго до AI. В XVIII веке сразу несколько учёных пытались заставить механизм говорить. И это не метафора. Самый показательный кейс – 1783 год. Аббат Микаль показывает в Париже две бронзовые головы, которые ведут диалог. Да, буквально: стоят и «разговаривают» друг с другом. Как это работало: 🔹 внутри меха создают поток воздуха 🔹 трубки имитируют голосовой аппарат 🔹 мембра…
❤3👍1🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2
А что сложнее всего делегировать вам? 👇
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
«Хочешь сделать хорошо – сделай сам» – мысль, знакомая многим предпринимателям. Проверить отчёт, ответить клиенту, проконтролировать задачу – часто хочется всё держать под личным контролем. И дело не всегда в сотрудниках. Чаще причина в другом: в компании нет понятных критериев результата, регламентов и прозрачной системы контроля. Когда задача существует только в голове руководителя, делегировать её действительно …
❤2
Недавно разбирали кейс с HR. 🔸Запрос был простой: «слишком много ручной работы и хаос в коммуникациях» Начали копать – оказалось: рассылки отдельно, голосования отдельно, данные вообще где придется. Собрали всё в одного бота. Теперь он: – сам отправляет сообщения и опросы – собирает ответы – напоминает, если кто-то не ответил – подтягивает всё в CRM И самое интересное –ничего «магического». Просто процессы наконе…
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
Кажется, мы стоим на пороге первого поколения, которое не будет «осваивать» ИИ. Для них AI – это не инструмент. Это среда, как для нас интернет. 🔹 Мы учились искать информацию. Они будут учиться формулировать намерение. 🔹 Мы запоминали факты. Они будут работать с системами, которые помнят всё. Многие до сих пор думают, что AI «сделает людей глупее». Но технологии обычно работают наоборот: они убирают рутину и подн…
❤2🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
Каждый день одно и то же: сообщения, звонки, встречи, «надо срочно», «посмотрите сейчас», «без вас не решим». И в какой-то момент кажется, что все важно и нужно решить прямо сейчас. Но это не так. Срочное требует немедленного решения. А важное влияет на достижение ваших долгосрочных целей. Как же навести порядок в задачах? Есть 3 простых метода 👇 1. Матрица Эйзенхауэра Разделите задачи на 4 группы: 🔸 Важно и сро…
❤1
Отправьте тому самому коллеге😆
❤3
А вам пишут по рабочим вопросам после 19:00?? 👇
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Почему предпринимателю важно отстаивать личные границы? Рабочий день закончился, а уведомления продолжают приходить: 📩 сотрудник уточняет задачу 📩 клиент просит «быстро ответить» 📩 команда ждёт решения по вопросу Постепенно бизнес начинает занимать не только рабочее время, но и всё остальное. Часто проблема не в количестве задач, а в привычке быть на связи 24/7. Со временем это приводит к усталости, а команда привы…
👍2💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sysoev_ai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А что сложнее всего делегировать вам? 👇
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
А вам пишут по рабочим вопросам после 19:00?? 👇
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какой совет начинающему предпринимателю вы бы НЕ дали?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 19 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лаборатория Ивана Сысоева” (@sysoev_ai), 35 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sysoev_ai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.