3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 52–53 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 10:16
52
no change
8 Aug 2026, 03:56
52
-1
7 Aug 2026, 19:44
53
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
141.0%
avg views ÷ 52 subscribers
Avg views / post
73.3
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.95%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held
20 (28 July 2026 – 9 August 2026)
Views total
1,466
Reactions total
65
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
179
Videos
7
Links
51
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
2m 14s
Average length
1m 07s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
65 reactions across 16 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5206311505980594479
16
24.6%
custom 5393607290228067750
12
18.5%
custom 5001758641921983048
7
10.8%
⚡
7
10.8%
custom 5451824893320505839
5
7.69%
custom 5343955969342741156
4
6.15%
custom 5003543424171770615
3
4.62%
custom 5188680072524996250
3
4.62%
custom 5003533408308036241
2
3.08%
custom 5005765910833660637
2
3.08%
custom 5224607267797606837
2
3.08%
custom 5359319827569727155
2
3.08%
Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как правильно критиковать Ислам? 😎
🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍✝️🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍
В последнее время все больше людей волнует такая религия как ислам. Конечно их опасения являются верными, только они отвечают на это неумело. Они говорят что Аллах является пидорасом и что Мухаммед это педофил. Естественно это верные аргументы, однако они не понимают что мусульмане эти аргументы не воспринимают, для них и то и другое является вполне нормальной практикой…
Щас работаю над ограненными алмазами, не буду активным на протяжении некоторого времени, поэтому не смогу отвечать. 👁 Ждите ржомбы и мудрости как в старые времена.
Ислам это Арабский Национализм?🇸🇦
🤍🤍🤍✝️🤍🤍🤍
Есть имеющее основания утверждение о том, что религия Ислам была создана как оправдание идеи арабского «превосходства» над неарабами и особенно создана как культ поколения клану Курайшитов. Как достоверные хадисы так и сам Коран являются верными доказательствами в пользу этого утверждения
🤍🤍🤍✝️🤍🤍🤍
В Коране Мекка считается "матью городов"
Сура 6:92
Это — благословенное Писан…
🤍🤍🤍🤍☦️🤍🤍🤍🤍
Язычество это не традиция
Дело в том, что эпоха язычества давно прошла: даже балтийское язычество мертво уже 800 лет. Люди больше не мыслят в рамках языческой парадигмы и даже не имеют о ней полного представления. Для настоящего язычника боги в первую очередь — это существа, отвечающие за конкретные аспекты его жизни: например, от воли Велеса зависит здоровье его скота. Для него благосклонность бога являе…
Падение Язычества: Невозможность Возрождения
🤍🤍🤍🤍☦️🤍🤍🤍🤍
Предисловие
Несколько лет назад я фанател по язычеству и даже пытался «поклоняться» языческим богам; мне, естественно, нравилась и языческая эстетика.
Однако со временем я всё больше разочаровывался в язычестве, поскольку оно не могло предложить четкие моральные принципы: в нём видят всё что угодно и подмешивают множество синкретических доктрин, что мешает пон…
🤍🤍🤍🤍☦️🤍🤍🤍🤍
Христианский форум "Ковчег", чат в темах теологии и простого общения
🤍🤍🤍🤍☦️🤍🤍🤍🤍
Здесь хорошие люди смогут поделиться своими знаниями без лишних стрессовых факторов, доброжелательно и уважительно, хорошее начало
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @synthwave_enjoyer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Synthwave_Enjoyer” (@synthwave_enjoyer), 52 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/synthwave_enjoyer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
