5 measurements spanning 20 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 923–952 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Aug 2026, 09:47
926
-5
19 Aug 2026, 03:53
931
-8
12 Aug 2026, 14:57
939
-10
6 Aug 2026, 13:49
949
no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:33
949
first reading
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 28 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
37 reactions across 6 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
37
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 28 December 2024 to 14 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
بحضور رسمي وشعبي، رئيس مجلس القبائل والعشائر الشيخ عبد المنعم الناصيف يفتتح مضافة للقبائل والعشائر في قرية الواسطة بريف حلب الجنوبي، وسط مشاركة واسعة من شخصيات حكومية رفيعة ووجهاء العشائر والفعاليات الاجتماعية والأهالي.
وشهد حفل الافتتاح كلمات أكدت أهمية دور العشائر في تعزيز التماسك المجتمعي وترسيخ قيم التعاون والتآخي، إلى جانب دور المضافة في استقبال الوفود وعقد اللقاءات الاجتماعية والمجتمعية.
وتُعد المضافة ملتقى …
لقاء جمع رئاسة مجلس القبائل والعشائر السورية مع وزير الزراعة في حكومة تصريف الأعمال
#مجلس_القبائل_والعشائر_السورية
👍4
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @symajley. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,139,235 of 1,629,452 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
حكومة الإنقاذ السورية @SyriangSG · 38,343 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مجلس القبائل والعشائر السورية” (@symajley), 926 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/symajley.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
