ищем адм / владельца в этот канал ! 🌟 подать анкету можно здесь

Channel
♡゙ . 𝗌𝗑𝟨 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗌
@sx6relates
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
477subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003198515453 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sx6relates |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 December 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sx6relates |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 477 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 479 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:49 | 480 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 480 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
998 reactions across 19 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 6163339019640903331 | 344 | 34.5% | |
| custom 5190675802093546323 | 306 | 30.7% | |
| custom 5222108309795908493 | 89 | 8.92% | |
| custom 5408997648403299450 | 65 | 6.51% | |
| ❤🔥 | 63 | 6.31% | |
| custom 5280804655712994143 | 27 | 2.71% | |
| custom 5019499171841836094 | 19 | 1.90% | |
| 🕊 | 19 | 1.90% | |
| 👾 | 16 | 1.60% | |
| custom 5308008128162335025 | 14 | 1.40% | |
| custom 5305600240647181510 | 13 | 1.30% | |
| custom 5213114549493846220 | 7 | 0.701% | |
| custom 5280672770152237682 | 5 | 0.501% | |
| custom 5305368887938818502 | 5 | 0.501% | |
| custom 5287365514610378602 | 3 | 0.301% | |
| custom 5289803192018703968 | 3 | 0.301% |
Custom emoji. 13 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 998reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2026 to 25 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 8
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
- Most on one post
- 8
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sx6relates. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 April 2026 to 25 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
🌟🥹🥹🤩я ненавижу, когда меня считают олицетворением гнева и злости, когда меня напрямую связывают с чем-то чудовищно негативным и агрессивным, ведь я не такой на самом деле. всё это — лишь следствие внешних обстоятельств, и веду я себя так далеко не без причин. если бы люди знали, насколько я на самом деле хрупок и раним. но при этом меня странно греет, что хоть кто-то считает меня сильным, потому что как бы я ни стара…
custom 616333901964090333164custom 519067580209354632329custom 522210830979590849321custom 54089976484032994508
🌟🥹🤩иногда кажется, что мне проще поддаться мимолетному влечению и заводить короткие интрижки, чтобы хоть как-то удовлетворить свою потребность в любви, потому что сама мысль о долгосрочных отношениях, которые строятся на доверии и понимании в первую очередь меня угнетает. . . ведь я не готов видеть и чувствовать, как любимый человек во мне разочаровывается, не готов чувствовать отвержение, непринятие и само…
custom 616333901964090333147custom 519067580209354632322custom 522210830979590849312custom 54089976484032994502
🌟🌟 🥹🤩я глубоко убежден, что такого человека, как я невозможно искренне полюбить и понять, но при этом я требую полного принятия от того, кто, как мне кажется, меня любит. и если он не оправдывает моих ожиданий, то я воспринимаю это как доказательство своей правоты: меня и правда нельзя полюбить . . 🤩 🤩𝓼x6relates ❤️
custom 616333901964090333154custom 519067580209354632323custom 522210830979590849313custom 54089976484032994505
︎ ︎︎ ︎︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎ ︎︎🤩 меня приводит в панику сама мысль о близких отношениях. любые мои попытки проявить любовь или ласку вызывают у меня отторжение, ведь это означает признать себя уязвимым и нуждающимся в ком то. я же сильный и ни от кого не завишу, разве нет? 🤩 🐈⬛ 𝓼x6relates
custom 519067580209354632336custom 616333901964090333126custom 540899764840329945010custom 52221083097959084935
︎ ︎︎ ︎︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎ ︎︎🤩 мои родители в ранние годы (и порой до сих пор) были настолько инфантильны, что я перестал ждать от них надёжности. они не давали мне опоры и ощущения безопасности, скорее наоборот, именно их поведение породило во мне постоянный страх и неуверенность. 🤩 🐈⬛ 𝓼x6relates
custom 519067580209354632341custom 616333901964090333128custom 540899764840329945013custom 52221083097959084935
🗒😂😂 𝗆𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗆𝗒 𝗌𝗈𝟫 🌟 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗍𝖾
custom 519067580209354632327custom 522210830979590849311custom 54089976484032994509custom 61633390196409033315
︎ ︎︎ ︎︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎ ︎︎🤩 одна из самых трудных для меня вещей - это контроль над собственной импульсивностью. мне всегда кажется, что в стрессовых ситуациях у меня не будет времени на раздумья: нужно реагировать здесь и сейчас. 🤩 🎀 𝓼x6relates 🖤 🥹 𝓼ub
custom 519067580209354632339custom 616333901964090333119custom 52221083097959084938custom 54089976484032994506
⋰ да, я sx6, и ... иногда настолько сильно прячусь за маской агрессии, что в одиночестве сам себя не узнаю (и боюсь) ... ⚠ ˢᵁᴮ⟹ @sx6relates
custom 616333901964090333123custom 54089976484032994509custom 51906758020935463238custom 52221083097959084934
🩷 🥹сх6 как запахи . . ︎ ︎︎ ︎︎︎ ︎🔵 t.me/sx6relates
custom 519067580209354632322custom 616333901964090333111custom 52221083097959084935custom 54089976484032994501
︎ ︎︎ ︎︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎ ︎︎🤩 мне очень тяжело видеть недостатки в тех, кому я доверяю и на чью защиту полагаюсь. это сразу вызывает чувство того, что я облажался, и подрывает веру в то, что на кого-то вообще можно положиться. ︎ ︎︎ ︎︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎ ︎︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎ ︎🐱 t.me/sx6relates
custom 616333901964090333138custom 519067580209354632317custom 501949917184183609410custom 52221083097959084935custom 52131145494938462202
🩷 🥹напоминаю, что это НЕ является способом для типирования ! ! ︎ ︎︎ ︎︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎ ︎︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎ ︎︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎ ︎︎sub ♡゙ sx6relates
custom 519067580209354632326custom 616333901964090333112custom 50194991718418360949custom 52131145494938462205
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sx6relates. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 447,368 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@sx6relates named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“♡゙ . 𝗌𝗑𝟨 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗌” (@sx6relates), 477 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sx6relates.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.