Channel
@sweateconomyplus
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
778subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001672613399 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sweateconomyplus |
| Description | Insights into the movement economy! |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 29 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sweateconomyplus |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sept 2026, 01:22 | 778 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
87 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 30 | 34.5% | |
| 👍 | 21 | 24.1% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 9.20% | |
| 🤣 | 8 | 9.20% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 5.75% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 4.60% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 4.60% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 3.45% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 2.30% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 1.15% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 1.15% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 March 2025 to 27 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Most altcoins won’t survive the coming bear market. Brace for impact! I am not talking about red charts; entire ecosystems will collapse into irrelevance. Unprofitable projects with weak fundamentals and no real utility will vanish outright. 💀 SWEAT is no exception. It is on track to bleed down to a sub-$5M market cap, relegated to the ranks of forgotten micro-cap shitcoins. While it may technically survive the d…
❤7✍1
🪙 80.5M SWEAT deposited into Jars in September! This is just $129,000 guys. There is absolutely nothing to celebrate here. There is no business to build here other than serving brainrot Ads.
🤣3
I stopped stocking up on SWEAT years ago. I haven’t sold either—mainly because of my ego. There’s a certain shame in pulling pennies out of a vault where you once poured thousands. Sometimes the loss is so brutal that there’s no point cutting it off—especially when it doesn’t move the needle in your bigger portfolio. You just let it sit there, a reminder of past optimism that turned sour. My NEAR wallet has become …
💯3❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
Seriously, why are you still holding SWEAT? I am curious 🤔
❤1
🟢 Near Protocol has been struggling in the market for months now. When you look at the speed at which mega corporations and grassroots AI communities are already pushing boundaries; democratizing access and constantly improving models, it is hard to see how Near Protocol's pivot will stand out. By the time they bring something to market, the space might already be dominated by players moving ten times faster in Web…
👍2❤1
😀 Sweat Hub This month, Sweat Economy rolled out SWEAT Hub, hyped as the “gateway to the biggest growth engine in consumer crypto,” boasting more than 2.5 million monthly active users. Big words, bold promises. But peel back the glossy pitch, and SWEAT Hub is nothing more than a storefront designed to sell your attention to endless advertisers. If it works (and it probably will), the Sweat Foundation pockets more …
💯5❤2👏2😐1
We’ve Completely Lost the Plot If you had invested $1,000 in SWEAT when it launched three years ago, that investment would now be worth just $25. 🙂 Let that sink in. This isn’t just a minor underperformance or bad luck due to “market conditions”, it’s a complete erosion of value, and no amount of spin from the Sweat Foundation can explain it away. Yet time and again, the team blames the market. As if Bitcoin and o…
❤12
Sweat Economy Plus pinned a photo
💀 Another one bites the dust! Apple’s watchOS 26 is set to introduce more personalized ways to stay active. One standout feature: Workout Buddy It bears a striking resemblance to Sweat Economy’s long-promised AI coach. The difference? Apple’s version will, of course, be more optimized, accurate, and seamlessly integrated within its ecosystem. Just like that, another Sweat Economy dream gets cannibalized by a bigg…
❤3🔥2😁2
🖼 A Fresh Coat of Paint, But the Same Cracks Beneath While I was "away," quite a few changes rolled out. Sweat Economy now has a new domain, a redesigned website, and a fresh whitepaper. Aesthetically, it’s a solid refresh—clean, modern, and encouraging in the sense that the team is clearly still passionate and pushing forward. But beneath the surface, nothing has fundamentally changed. The whitepaper is essential…
❤3👏2🤔1🫡1
If you're hunting for the next explosive crypto asset to buy at these generational lows with the hope of a phenomenal return this bull cycle, then let's be honest—SWEAT Economy probably shouldn’t be at the top your shortlist. But if you’re someone who’s building a portfolio of alternative long-term plays, Sweat Economy absolutely deserves a spot on that list. Because if there's one thing we've learned after all thi…
👍5🤔2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sweateconomyplus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
About SWEAT
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 March 2025 to 27 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sweat Economy Plus” (@sweateconomyplus), 778 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sweateconomyplus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.