Channel
@swear_but_true
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
30subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003827983207 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @swear_but_true |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 26 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/swear_but_true |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 30 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 28 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:00 | 28 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 26 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (26 May 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 132 |
| Reactions total | 14 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
64 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 32 | 50.0% | |
| ❤ | 17 | 26.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 14.1% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 6.25% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 3.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
чё-то делаю.... в общем-то уже несколько месяцев я прицельно работаю над одним петом связанным с очками. работа идёт то очень плотно, то буквально еле ползёт, то снова идёт пися-в-писю с основной работой по количеству часов 😋 история проекта так же стара как мир начинается где-то в далёкой-далёкой галактике: когда-то в годы преподавания я просто придумала для эфира бриф чтобы развлечь дизайнеров, и там была оптика …
вот спустя почти неделю и оттанцевала Магика де Гипноз на злодейском рейве клюв в итоге выдержал почти все: в какой то момент я слишком активно танцевала и акрил который по моим ощущениям ничем не смыть, просто отпечатался в местах соприкосновения с лицом) но несмотря на это образ все равно был супер и визуально и по удобству применения + ничего не развалилось включая меня довольна как слон утка, дальше можно снова…
❤5
трагедия в десяти действиях немного забыла что папье-маше пиздец как долго просыхает, поэтому наивные фантазии о том как я за день скафчу клюв умерли, на замену им пришли две фатальные технологические ошибки: 1. не надо было на этапе папье-маше смешивать пва с водой (нахуя я ваще это сделала? 😵) . из за этого бумажная основа получилась слишком мягкой, и следующий слой пластичной массы из за этого тоже не то чтобы п…
🔥5❤2🙏2
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥10
происходит подготовка к движу. злодейскому движу 😄 через пару недель будет вечеринка и я, по обыкновению, хотела себе придумать нишевый 🤩🤩🤩 костюм злодея. сначала хотелось быть цветочком из капхед, но подумала что под треки Муцураева Сыендука надо что-то в чем можно двигаться более свободно (наряд луны на цирковой-2007 пати меня многому научил…..), и вот думы о Зиг-Заг Макряке и Скрудже Макдаке навели на мысли «была…
🔥6
пока я не возвращаюсь к вопросам одежды будущего за меня это делают адидас и Рик Оуэнс (думаю больше все таки Рик Оуэнс) 🤩🌚🤩 девочка с надувной курткой и в шортах реально топ
🔥5
в последнее время смотрю на канал и немножко печалюсь — дел сейчас дохуя, а постов нихуя. как будто надо сделать небольшой отчет самой себе: — сделано это — вот это — и здесь еще работа кипит пиздец как, Я ДАЖЕ ПОВАЙБКОДИЛА ПЕРВЫЙ РАЗ ВЧЕРА 🤤 💀это было восхитительно петшопы тоже вроде как двигаются, хоть и не так активно, но зато с дедлайнами, так что шанс ДОДЕЛАТЬ что-то в этом году велик 🚲 скоро даже надеюсь мож…
❤10
помните скетч костюма? к сожалению, я была слишком занята крутым времяпрепровождением, поэтому парадной фотки лука не случилось, зато в процессе кайфа меня чутка поснимали на сцене🌜 ностромо и другие петы тоже двигаются потихоньку, но сами понимаете, иногда и из дома выходить не помешает....... думаю процесс создания своих костюмов для вечеринок тоже можно было бы сюда выкладывать — для меня это ничуть не менее увл…
❤🔥9🤝4
кажется, из приличных проектов я обо всех петах рассказала, дальше придется только че то по ним делать чтобы выкладывать, и ждать славные времена, когда можно будет рассказать о неприличных
это еще один мой хорека-гештальт, придуманный и собранный на коленке в мудборд около пяти лет назад, пока не видевший особо свет ✋бар для грустных🤚 бар в японском стиле с русской грустной душой электронная музыка типа free flow flava и ndls404, собственное производство пива-саке, и русская тоска в стиле манги.....мммммм тогда проект очень сильно споткнулся об оформление — мне хотелось чтобы классические сюжеты ру…
🔥6
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @swear_but_true. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 950,657 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“матерюсь, но делаю” (@swear_but_true), 30 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/swear_but_true.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.