https://x.com/swannycrypto/status/1810155266174005363

Channel
Swanny’s Squad
@swannysquad
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
546subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001962497232 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @swannysquad |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/swannysquad |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 546 | -4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:56 | 550 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:36 | 553 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 553 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:56 | 554 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 30 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2s
- Average length
- 2s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 66.7% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2024 to 8 July 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Long term whale from 3 months ago, just aped another fat bag, hasn't sold a penny :) CONVICTION
GM 155 sol buy on BOXXY
👏1
$OMW - On My Way degen play, CTO... I grabbed some a bit higher and DCA'd and chart is reversing. Socials set up and community is building within the TG. Could be a nice play for this quiet sunday. Socials https://t.me/omwctoo https://x.com/omwcto chart: https://photon-sol.tinyastro.io/en/lp/HNM5yTTsmHPcgUBhBxnFbyXvTzVMaY74Rcg9jf6gt9KG?handle=4259065749a66f982a8c2
$BOXXY After reaching $1.9m from $750l call, it's had a healthy pull back, currently sitting at around $1.4m MC. As mentioned, i'll be holding this one, expecting another push coming into EST morning and look to find new highs. Everything is a risk, however I do foresee this a safer play. Many people that bought 2 months ago still holding, and buying more. I like what I'm seeing, and with little people actually c…
👍1
$WIZZIE $300k Wizzie doing nicely, nice slow cook after hitting $460k MC while I slept form initial call of $239k. Sitting currently at $300k mc, the CTO team are doing really great with content, and believe coming into this week we should see this really continue to push in a positive trajectory. The 15 min chart is nice, I like the fact it hasn't been a pnd. always prefer these slower cooks, gives excellent op…
TON Update: Caught the bottom on the 3 tokens I posted about 2 days ago: $MITTENS - $3.6m now $5.7m (hit $5.9m) $REGI - $2.6m now $3.04m (hit $3.2m) $OR - $1.2 now $1.5m (hit $1.7m) Holding these, if they come back down enough over the weekend, I'll look to add more, however I do believe these will continue to slowly move up.
Boxxy Coin Buy! 💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙💜💙 🔀 Spent $2,786.80 (20 SOL) 🔀 Got 127,694,878 BOXXY 👤 Buyer / TX 🪙 Position +21% 💸 Market Cap $1,514,867 DexT | Screener | Buy | Trending
WIZZIE - SOL CTO $239k This CTO has been slowly growing for 4-5 days now. It's been a slow build up, but have confidence in the people involved leading it - not only are they running it they have invested themselves personally and spending to ensure this goes far. Community growth has been organic thus far - key to any good meme/CTO. I think it is a nice little gem, so bought some last night, and DCA'd just now o…
👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
Wrote about BOXXY too!! https://x.com/swannycrypto/status/1809451365254721690
someone knows something, 47 sol buy on BOXXY
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @swannysquad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@swannysquad named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Swanny’s Squad” (@swannysquad), 546 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/swannysquad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.