Анализ рынка Телеграм ботов и миниаппов: Январь 2026. https://swanrate.com/january-2026-report-ru Совместно с @easystatsbot
🔥6👍1

Channel
@swan_rate
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
123subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002201168445 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @swan_rate |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 24 August 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/swan_rate |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 123 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:32 | 122 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:56 | 122 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
33 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 27 | 81.8% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 9.09% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 6.06% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 3.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 August 2024 to 1 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Анализ рынка Телеграм ботов и миниаппов: Январь 2026. https://swanrate.com/january-2026-report-ru Совместно с @easystatsbot
🔥6👍1
Январь 2026 Топ самых быстрорастущих ботов за этот месяц. @swan_rate
🔥5👍1
А вот что растет в телеге стабильно так это всякие VPN боты данные @swan_rate_bot пдпшс
🔥3
Вот стата по ботам-оберткам (чатгпт и тп) Что же такое случилось в мае? Случаем, не анонс интеграции xAI с тг? Или релиз YandexGPT какой-нибудь? данные @swan_rate_bot UPD: летом все ушли на каникулы просто sub
число ботов, связанных с тг подарками растет, а их суммарное MAU как будто вышло на плато данные @swan_rate_bot подписаться
А вот рынок всяких скачивалок видео/аудио из инсты, вк, тт как будто вышел на плато. Все такие боты бесплатны и заставляют подписываться друг на друга данные @swan_rate_bot подписаться
Swan Rate: the Update 💾 Favorites 💾 Now you can bookmark any bot to quickly track its stats. The most requested feature is out there. Let’s keep an eye on the next big things 📞
🔥4
🦢🦢🦢 We are finally back and start planning new features. Please share your thoughts on what we should implement next. @swan_rate_bot
Find prediction markets on Telegram @swan_rate_bot
❤🔥1
added: Top / Trending / New bots Trending bots are sorted by the last 7 days absolute user growth. New bots are the bots with 10k+ MAU that we recently found. The green/red percentage shows the weekly growth rate. Thanks to our comminuty that keeps us focused on the stuff that brings the value. Please share your thoughs and use cases in our chat: @swan_rate_chat
🔥3
Can’t find the Telegram bot for yourself? Use the better search at @swan_rate_bot
🔥2
Really useful bot that really hard to find. This bot updates the link preview cache on Telegram servers. Really useful if you change the content and want to update the preview as well. @WebpageBot
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @swan_rate. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🦢 Swan Rate Channel” (@swan_rate), 123 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/swan_rate.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.