Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

SWAGA TEAM

@swagateam7

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

51subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003165946789
TypeChannel
Username@swagateam7
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 31 December 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/swagateam7

Growth

5111 Aug 2026, 22:16 — 51 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 21:53 — 51 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 22:1612 Aug 2026, 21:53
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 50–52 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:5351no change
11 Aug 2026, 22:1651first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 12 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 41s
Average length
56s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

243 reactions across 10 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💋7430.5%
7330.0%
🔥2811.5%
💘187.41%
🍓124.94%
❤‍🔥83.29%
💅83.29%
💯83.29%
😘72.88%
🥰62.47%
10.412%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 243reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 12 April 2026 to 26 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jun 2026, 20:41 UTC58 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @zzumoonVideo

Моя первая постановка с собственной хореографией 😭 (кроме второго куплета и припева соответственно) BTS не придумали хореографию на половину песни, поэтому это сделала я😇 Выступаем со Свагой завтра на open air от студии Джэм возле летуаля в 16:00😇 А потом будет рандомка, в которую я добавила треки, которые вы присылали в пост в подслушке. Ждем всех кпоперов, потанцевать🤍

7💋3💘2

20 Jun 2026, 20:14 UTC426 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

мини спойлер первые шаги маленьких бтс

💋74💘1

19 May 2026, 11:58 UTC677 views23 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

SWAGA TEAM – Like Crazy✴︎ˊ˗ K-FEST 16.05.26 boys cover

💋124💯4🍓1💅1💘1

18 May 2026, 08:59 UTC493 views19 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

⋆˙⟡ SWAGA TEAM – Like crazy K-FEST Pyatigorsk 16.05.26⊹ ࣪ ˖

💋8💘4🥰42🍓1

11 May 2026, 20:49 UTC370 views13 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

Всем привет!♡ Уже 16.05 мы встретимся на K-FEST! Вы сможете увидеть нас 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 А также в других номерах ↓ ✶1 блок 13 номер SIREN ✶1 блок 20 номер РЫБКА ✶2 блок 4 номер LIMINAE ✶3 блок 7 номер alina

9💋31

12 Apr 2026, 15:12 UTC277 views33 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

#swagaconcept CONCEPT PHOTO ⊹ ࣪ ˖ BTS – Swim⊹𓊝࣪ ˖ Alina as Jungkook Смотреть тут! ⊹ ࣪ ˖

10💋7🔥6❤‍🔥3🍓2💘2💅1🥰1

12 Apr 2026, 15:12 UTC150 views34 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

#swagaconcept CONCEPT PHOTO ⊹ ࣪ ˖ BTS – Swim⊹𓊝࣪ ˖ Nafisa as V Смотреть тут! ⊹ ࣪ ˖

💋108🔥7🍓2💘2💯2😘2💅1

12 Apr 2026, 15:12 UTC215 views33 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

#swagaconcept CONCEPT PHOTO ⊹ ࣪ ˖ BTS – Swim⊹𓊝࣪ ˖ Zuli as Jimin Смотреть тут! ⊹ ࣪ ˖

11💋8🔥6🍓2💅2💘2😘2

12 Apr 2026, 15:12 UTC235 views32 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

#swagaconcept CONCEPT PHOTO ⊹ ࣪ ˖ BTS – Swim⊹𓊝࣪ ˖ Arink as J-hope Смотреть тут! ⊹ ࣪ ˖

💋109🔥5🍓2💅2💘2💯2

12 Apr 2026, 15:12 UTC257 views32 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

#swagaconcept CONCEPT PHOTO ⊹ ࣪ ˖ BTS – Swim⊹𓊝࣪ ˖ VK as Suga Смотреть тут! ⊹ ࣪ ˖

9💋6❤‍🔥5🔥4🍓2💘2😘2💅1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @swagateam7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 743,564 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SWAGA TEAM” (@swagateam7), 51 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/swagateam7.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.