Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

مُلهم

@sw_ft7

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

541subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002284288796
TypeChannel
Username@sw_ft7
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sw_ft7

Growth

54110 Aug 2026, 03:46 — 541 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 15:26 — 541 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 03:4610 Aug 2026, 15:26
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 540–542 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 15:26541no change
10 Aug 2026, 03:46541first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.6%
avg views ÷ 541 subscribers
Avg views / post
150
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026
Posts held20 (13 May 202623 July 2026)
Views total299
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 03:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sw_ft7. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 May 2026 to 23 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2026, 18:50 UTC142 viewsread 10 August 2026

وأُخفي عنكَ شيئًا ليسَ يُحكى فأصمتُ ثمّ تفضحني عيوني ألا يا عين كنتِ الأمسَ أوفى فمن علّمكِ سرّا أن تخوني؟

22 Jul 2026, 16:59 UTC157 viewsread 10 August 2026

عَيناكِ بحرٌ كيف نحذرُ موجهُ والموج بعض المزن في عَيناكِ 👁

2 Jul 2026, 20:23 UTC383 viewsread 10 August 2026

. - فلا يرسو على قلبي سواكِ وليس على سواكِ اخطُّ سطرا. فاجملمهم اذا ابتسمت وضحكت تطلُّ الشمسُ من عينٍ لأخرى ووجهٌ مثل وجه البدرِ تبدو إذا شاهدتها شاهدتَ بدرا. - لحبكِ في عيوني ألف لحظِ وإن أخفيه زار العين جهرا - محالٌ أن نرى لكِ من شبيهٍ تفرّدت الجمالَ وزدتِ سحرا. وواحدةٌ من الجنات سقطت كغيثِ من جبين الغيمِ قُطرا. - لمن لاقى عيونكِ كيف يحيا إذا مامات يلقى فيكِ عذرا. - كيوسفُ أنتِ كم فيك مصابٌ يقطعُ فيك كفّا

30 Jun 2026, 16:26 UTC325 viewsread 10 August 2026

و خَرجتُ أسلُو عَن عُيونِكِ بائِسًا فَوَقَعتُ مِن عَينَيكِ فِي عَينيكِ . 😞😞😞

29 Jun 2026, 01:15 UTC349 views0 reactions5 Starsread 10 August 2026

"‏أُمسي وَأُصبِحُ وَالأَشواقُ تَلَعَبُ بي كَأَنَّما أَنا مِنها شارِبٌ ثَمِلُ وَأَستَلِذُّ نَسيماً مِن دِيارِكُمُ كَأَنَّ أَنفاسَهُ مِن نَشرِكُم قُبَلُ وَكَم أُحَمِّلُ قَلبي في مَحَبَّتِكُم ما لَيسَ يَحمِلُهُ قَلبٌ فَيَحتَمِلُ."

27 Jun 2026, 20:15 UTC362 viewsread 10 August 2026

- لأنتِ من له في القلبِ عرشٌ على قلبي تطلِّ وأنتِ أدرى. - لوصفكِ لا لغات الكونِ تكفي فكيف يطيل هذا الوصفِ شعرا. - لإسمكِ في خفوقي الف نبضٍ يطل على الضلوعِ تزيدُ سُكرا

27 Jun 2026, 07:13 UTC341 views0 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026

أحيّا بقُرِبكَ يَامن لَستُ المِسُه ‏إلا بِحُلمٍ وقد أبليتُ أحلامًا ‏أنا وأنت مَتى الأيامُ تَجمعُنا؟ ‏إني كَبْرتُ بهذا البُعدِ اعوَامًا

24 Jun 2026, 17:55 UTC393 viewsread 10 August 2026

وخدٌ من طلول الوردِ يَزهو ومَبسمكِ علي يصبُّ خمَرا - لِحبكِ والغرامِ أرى الرَوايا تدونها العيونُ فكيف تُقرا

22 Jun 2026, 20:24 UTC415 viewsread 10 August 2026

يظل هواكِ في جِفني وعَيني وبين دِماي من مَجرىً لِمجرى. - فلا أخفيكِ لو قد طال شوقي على ضِلعي وحُبكِ ليس يُبرى - عيونٌ ناعساتٌ اسحرتنِي محالٌ أن أرى لسواكِ سحرا.

20 Jun 2026, 23:03 UTC433 views0 reactions4 Starsread 10 August 2026

في جمال عينيكِ أُعذريني إن أطّلت النظر .

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sw_ft7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 682,906 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مُلهم” (@sw_ft7), 541 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sw_ft7.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.