Channel
@svobodavybora
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
3,972subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001227545404 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @svobodavybora |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/svobodavybora |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:44 | 3,972 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 3,973 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 3,977 | -3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 3,980 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 3,984 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 3,985 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:06 | 3,985 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 November 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
424 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 140 | 33.0% | |
| 🔥 | 128 | 30.2% | |
| 🎉 | 53 | 12.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 39 | 9.20% | |
| 💯 | 33 | 7.78% | |
| 😁 | 31 | 7.31% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 424reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 November 2023 to 22 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В погоне за вдохновением Если страх препятствует самореализации и достижению истинных целей, то вдохновение, наоборот, является нитью, ведущей через лабиринт кошмаров. Вопрос лишь в том, будешь ли ты следовать за ней по просторному коридору или пробираться через тернии к звёздам, отвлекаясь на чужие интересы. Многие ищут вдохновение в искусстве, на берегу моря или за чашкой кофе, даже не подозревая, что заветная…
👍22💯8🔥7❤🔥3
Под страхом Раскрою тему целеполагания под влиянием страха более подробно. Уверен, тебе знакомо состояние, когда в панике ты теряешь контроль и начинаешь совершать крайне сомнительные поступки. На деле же контроль остается, но передается подсознательной части психики, которая переключается в режим выживания и действует рефлекторно, экономя время на осмыслении и принятии решений. Единственная задача в таком сост…
👍16🔥6❤🔥4😁1
Новые цели Психоанализ – очень крутая и крайне эффективная штука в достижении абсолютно любой цели. Как мне показалось. Но оказалось, что с рядом вполне конкретно поставленных задач возникает иной или даже обратный результат. Почему так? Описанный мной Метод безупречно справляется со страхом. Пусть и требует определенного опыта и усердия. И всё дело в том, что на смену целям, продиктованным страхом, аналогично…
👍24🔥9❤🔥6🎉2
Posted without readable text
🎉24🔥4❤🔥1
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
🔥21🎉9❤🔥6💯2
Сначала я буду последним… ..кто поздравит тебя с Наступившим. Потому кратко и по существу: любви, здоровья и благополучия!🫶 Если разобраться, то все житейские старания, как в прочем и усердный самоанализ, сводятся к достижению этих трёх очевидных пунктов. Теперь генеральный план на ближайший год для тех, кто остается с нами: найти и устранить ограничения, препятствующие самореализации и получению радости от про…
🎉16👍7❤🔥3🔥2😁1
Вы еще здесь?👀
🔥29💯11😁9👍7
Video, posted without a caption
😁14🔥7👍4💯1
Тут такое дело Совершенно внезапно я решил взять творческий отпуск. Да да, знаю, что обещал сторисы, разборы ограничений и партнерскую программу… Но. Давай будем честны по отношению друг к другу. Я уже так много рассказал, а ты так мало сделал, что встает вопрос: зачем нужны еще 1/10/100 постов про то, как оторвать жопочку от коврика для йоги, компутера или своих супер важных дел, чтобы наконец взглянуть на то, ч…
👍25🔥11😁6❤🔥5💯5🎉2
В чем смысл Из любого чайника сегодня можно услышать, что смысл жизни в самой жизни. Мол, ищет его тот, кто не нашёл счастья, и прочие скольжения на банановой кожуре. В действительности же логика есть во всём. И она будет чётко представлена в последующих постах: зачем мы это пишем и зачем ты это читаешь. И начнем со смысла – в чём он? Если не учитывать поддержание самого существования, то смысл заключается в у…
👍11💯5🔥3
Образовательное пространство Мы с командой решили сделать канал более информативным и добавить несколько новых форматов: - Посты в ленте с разбором основных идей, изложенных в книге. - Сторис с подробными комментариями. - Эфиры с ответами на вопросы читателей и участников сообщества, возникающих в ходе практики. Личными мыслями и опытом я продолжу делиться уже у себя в личном канале. Там же я решил рассказать…
👍8🔥6❤🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @svobodavybora. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как тебе формат эфира с ответами на распространенные вопросы?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 November 2023 to 22 March 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 67,921 of 1,623,166entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SVOBODA VYBORA || Метасообщество” (@svobodavybora), 3,972 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/svobodavybora.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.