🤝🤝
😁7

Channel
@svitbez
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,030subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001554377695 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @svitbez |
| Created | 6 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/svitbez |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 1,030 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:52 | 1,031 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 1,032 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:55 | 1,032 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 14 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
180 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 42 | 23.3% | |
| 👍 | 34 | 18.9% | |
| 😁 | 34 | 18.9% | |
| ❤ | 24 | 13.3% | |
| 🤡 | 19 | 10.6% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 3.89% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 3.33% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 3.33% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 2.22% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 1.67% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.556% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 180reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2025 to 4 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤝🤝
😁7
Невдовзі до столиці з візитом прибуде «купол» Києва спецпосланець Трампа Кіт Келлог. @operinform
👍6👎1
Ахахахаххахахаха
😁10🤣7
😁💪
🤡19😁1
Про готовність ППО країн Заходу до умов довготривалих сучасних конфліктів: Ізраїль стикається з серйозним дефіцитом ракет до протиракетних систем «Arrow» Поточна кількість ракет-перехоплювачів до систем «Arrow» вже не дозволяє Ізраїлю продовжувати масові перехоплення, якщо конфлікт не буде завершено найближчим часом. У зв’язку з дефіцитом цих ракет Збройні сили США розгортають додаткові протиракетні системи на тер…
😢1
росія готується до нападу на країни Балтії? Литва, Латвія та Естонія розробляють плани масової евакуації росія розглядає Балтію як ключовий регіон для послаблення НАТО. Контроль над Балтійським морем може підірвати єдність Альянсу, особливо якщо рф застосує гібридні тактики, як-от провокації з використанням російськомовного населення чи кібератаки. На тлі цих загроз країни Балтії — Литва, Латвія та Естонія — домови…
Купол теж не вивіз масовану атаку балістикою
😢5👀3
Російський Яндекс розмив військові об'єкти в москві, видавши їх місцезнаходження
😁16
Photo, posted without a caption
👍10❤5
Вражено 34% стратегічних носіїв крилатих ракет на основних аеродромах базування рф.
🔥10❤2👍2
😎🇺🇦🇮🇱Українська спецоперація "Павутина" в рази перевершує операції МОССАД, враховуючи її обсяги, цілі та потенційні наслідки. 🔥На відміну від Ізраїлю та підриву пейджерів членів ліванської Хезболли, Україна змогла нанести критичні втрати для стратегічної авіації ядерної держави, на аеродромах, котрі знаходяться за 4000+ км від українського кордону. 🫡Сьогодні ми стали свідками історичного дня, з чим я вас і вітаю.
❤14🔥9
Додаткові кадри з аеродрому Оленья Мурманської обл., де, як заявляється, з фури злетіли БПЛА і влучають по російським стратегічним літакам Підписатися | Зв'язок | Чат
👏4👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @svitbez. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“СВІТБЕЗ” (@svitbez), 1,030 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/svitbez.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.