Channel
@svet_klinom
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
170subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002665062607 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @svet_klinom |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/svet_klinom |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 22:19 | 170 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:26 | 169 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 168 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 163 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 163 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 19 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
77 reactions across 8 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 42 | 54.5% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 14.3% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 11.7% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 5.19% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 5.19% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 2.60% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 2.60% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.30% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.30% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 1.30% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 1 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сегодня начало лета (и это наконец-то похоже на лето), а еще День защиты детей. Детский сегмент, на самом деле, пиарить не очень легко. Медиа с нужными форматами и инфлюенсеров, которым действительно доверяют родители, не так уж много. А еще в этой нише, как ни в какой другой, аудитория крайне чувствительна к любым вопросам репутации и качества. Собрала мои любимые детские фэшн-бренды и детские линейки «взрослых» б…
❤10🔥1🦄1😍1
Итак, по поводу русского кода на маркетплейсах) Иногда попадаются любопытные айтемы: например, тейпы с гжелью! Вот так наклеил себе и бежишь очередной забег по перекрытой Москве 💁🏻♀️ ❤️ - круто! 😢 - за что?
❤9😁4😢1
На прошлой неделе я была на паблик-токе в Noodome на тему «Русский культурный код в бизнесе и рекламе». Супер актуальная тема, на которую, на самом деле, было уже много сказано. Интересно было послушать Андрея Колбасинова, основателя чайной «Нитка» — мне очень нравится проект и всё, что они делают. Необычный взгляд Дэвида Хендерсона-Стюарта (часовой завод «Ракета») — иностранец в России многие вещи видит под другим у…
❤6👍2🔥1
Очень часто коллабы с музеями создаются по максимально упрощенной схеме: взяли изображение и нанесли на что-то. С точки зрения инфоповода вроде и хорошо, но вот с точки зрения самого продукта - не всегда удачно. Поэтому мне так понравились кейсы бренда Svyazat с Пушкинским музеем и Третьяковской галереей: вязаные аксессуары по мотивам музейных артефактов. Классный инфоповод, красивый визуал, виральный продукт. Един…
❤7🥰2😍2
Вчера была на масштабном мероприятии в кластере Ломоносов, посвященном Дню предпринимателя. Было очень много гостей — настолько, что на некоторые камерные сессии было даже не попасть. Послушала два выступления: основателя «Нескучных финансов» Сергея Краснова и легендарного «продюсера жизни» Николая Картозии. Краснов рассказывал про изменения приоритетов в компании в условиях кризиса этого года, а также про интересны…
👍6🔥4❤3
При всей популярности и массовости коллабов с народными промыслами в последние годы действительно интересных проектов было не так много. Коллаборация Monochrome х Объединение «Гжель» мне понравилась - и с точки зрения продукта, и с точки зрения визуала. Алиса Боха, конечно, обладает феноменальным даром «упаковывать» такие сложные истории так, что они превращаются в успешный коммерческий продукт (вспоминаю тут ее хито…
❤4👍3😍1
Выбираем название для рубрики:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Друзья, у меня возникла идея сделать рубрику с вопросами от вас на тему пиара. Раз в неделю буду выбирать один вопрос и развёрнуто отвечать. Давайте вместе выберем для неё название. Варианты такие: 1. Скажи-ка Света 2. Свет-Ответ 3. Света ответит Голосуем 💁🏻♀️
❤1👏1🔥1
Выживание, оптимизация, развитие — три главные темы 2026 года для фэшн-бизнеса. Именно на них сконцентрировалась практическая конференция «Мода в действии», которую проводят уже в пятый раз мои друзья FashionBuzz. 21-22 мая в онлайн формате эксперты поделятся информацией на актуальные темы: ✔️ Нужно ли вашему бизнесу внедрение ИИ? Честный обзор возможностей нейросетей: производство контента, ИИ-агенты, аналитика. Г…
✍2❤2🔥2
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @svet_klinom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Выбираем название для рубрики:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 1 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Свет Клином” (@svet_klinom), 170 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/svet_klinom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.