Channel
@sverhvova
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
244subscribers
+40 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001750021713 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sverhvova |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 20 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sverhvova |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 244 | -8 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:36 | 252 | +27 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:13 | 225 | +19 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 206 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:00 | 204 | no change |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 204 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
34 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 8 | 23.5% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 20.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 14.7% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 8.82% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 8.82% | |
| custom 5368329294567203895 | 2 | 5.88% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 5.88% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 5.88% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 2.94% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 2.94% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 Аэродром 🛫 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 Нельзя, пожалуй, сказать: я не чувствую ничего, ибо чувствительность не может пропасть, она как бы неразделима с духом, но можно сказать: я чувствую пустоту, — и действительно, пустота как ощущение обладает особой характерностью, это «воздух мыслей».
👍2👏2
Кому-то говорят: ты эгоцентрик, а мне говорят: ты космоцентрик. Я скажу какую-нибудь максиму, а они мне: как же ты космоцентричен!
👍3
🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 Космоцентризм 🧑🚀 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 Кто бездумно занимается какой-либо творческой деятельностью: художник, поэт, танцор, — утончая своё познание, не осознаёт, что утончает его, не отдаёт себе отчёта в том, какое общее значение имеют его индивидуальные формы самовыражения для восприятия целого. Таким образом, происходит развитие неполного самосознания, — его можно уподобить природе, развивающейся бес…
🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 Тонкая🔴грань 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 Вы не можете усомниться в решении, подсказанном интуицией. Интуиция не делает ситуацию двойственной, не вызывает сомнений, — она разрешает их.
🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 Исполнительское искусство 🎹 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 Слушатель запоминает не начало и конец выступления, а каким способом исполнитель одухотворял созвучия (общую направленность его художественного мышления).
🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 Перекраиваем мир на платоновский лад 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 (источник) 🌷⬅️☀️➡️🫶 (прекрасное)⬇️(добродетель) 📖 (истина) 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 Платон понуждает ум увидеть себя — и когда он видит себя, он видит третью истину (внеопытный факт), отличную и от предметов опыта (в которых мы убеждаемся восприятием и которые дают нам первичное пост…
👍2
🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 Депрессивные вопросы 😢 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 Демагоги, впадая в депрессию, спрашивают себя: «В чём бытие бытия? Есть ли смысл множить бытие в самом себе, приписывая ему предикаты, тождественные субъекту?»
🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 Строка🖋 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 Несовершенство, допущенное в гомеопатических дозах
custom 53683292945672038951
🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 Интерпретация 🔄 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 Водяной разгадывал сканворд — и ему попалось слово: Ж⬜️⬜️⬜️Ь Сверив свою версию с ответом, он нашёл, что они не совпали, но тут же почувствовал, что слова эти различаются только по звучанию.
❤1
🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤⛰✅🖤🖤 Приметы вечности в очертаниях плотных предметов 🖤🖤☀️➖🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 В каком случае вы говорите себе: «У меня много времени», — а в каком: «мало»?
🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 Рефлексия 🔍 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 Реакции на опубликованные записки я воспринимаю как реакции на чьи-то записки, ибо они стали тем, что и я теперь воспринимаю как читатель.
❤🔥2
🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 Исполнительское искусство 🎹 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 Артист должен обладать тем, что связывает все музыкальные фразы воедино. Можно внешне окрестить это «звучанием пауз», однако в действительности — метафизически — это сведение всех звуков в Единый и поручение Единому драматургии.
🔥2custom 53683292945672038951
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sverhvova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Живая материя текста” (@sverhvova), 244 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sverhvova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.