Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SveeL | Отзывы о работе

Channel

SveeL | Отзывы о работе

@sveel_reviews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001728023548
TypeChannel
Username@sveel_reviews
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/sveel_reviews

Growth

410 August 2026 — 4 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4 subscribers10 August 202613 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3–5 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:484no change
10 Aug 2026, 17:154first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 5 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
7

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

21 Feb 2026, 14:05 UTC244 viewsread 13 August 2026

Заказывал презентацию к эфиру у @tg_sveel. Сделал быстро и качественно 🤩

12 Feb 2026, 14:27 UTC242 viewsread 13 August 2026

@tg_sveel сделал сочнейший баннер за приятный прайс, выполнил все правки бесплатно. всё на высшем уровне, рекомендую

20 Jan 2026, 13:53 UTC296 viewsread 13 August 2026

@tg_sveel посоветовали этого дизайнера, обратился впервые, от результата просто ахуел, бомбезно и пиздец как дешево для такого уровня. Буду работать с ним на постоянной основе🤝

29 Nov 2025, 22:38 UTC251 viewsread 13 August 2026

@tg_sveel ахуенно оформил проект, лучший дизайнер в тг, можете сами глянуть результат в моем био

17 Nov 2025, 05:58 UTC437 viewsread 13 August 2026

@tg_sveel оформляет все мои проекты, все четко шикарно, сексуально, за дизайном только к нему, если давно не испытывали оргазм

4 Oct 2025, 12:00 UTC505 viewsread 13 August 2026

@tg_sveel сделал кайфовый баннер. Благодарочка

2 Oct 2025, 10:51 UTC505 viewsread 13 August 2026

✨ @tg_sveel сделал четко, круто. Рекомендую к работе

1 Oct 2025, 20:43 UTC489 viewsread 13 August 2026

@tg_sveel Классная работа, сделал быстро и качественно, работай остался доволен

30 Sept 2025, 15:16 UTC325 viewsread 13 August 2026

@tg_sveel Наебашил сочнейшую аватарку за копейки. Советую сотрудничество с ним!🌟

29 Sept 2025, 13:23 UTC443 viewsread 13 August 2026

@tg_sveel знает свою работу, сделал два баннера за короткое время, цена приятная, качество высокое

31 Aug 2025, 17:39 UTC447 viewsread 13 August 2026

ну кароч обратился я 5ч ночи к @tg_sveel за авой для бота сделал быстро, вкусно, няшно, слааааадко прям! рекомендую @tg_sveel

25 Aug 2025, 14:57 UTC438 viewsread 13 August 2026

@tg_sveel сочные работы только от него, перебрал много дизайнеров за полтора года работы, остановился на его работах Рекомендую главаря дизайна

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @sveel_reviews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SveeL | Отзывы о работе” (@sveel_reviews), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sveel_reviews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.