Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ༄˖°.🥮🍂Суслик Ксю🍂🍁.ೃ࿔*:・

Channel

༄˖°.🥮🍂Суслик Ксю🍂🍁.ೃ࿔*:・

@suslikksyu

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

90subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003564365961
TypeChannel
Username@suslikksyu
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/suslikksyu

Growth

8991908 August 2026 — 89 subscribers9 August 2026 — 91 subscribers9 August 2026 — 91 subscribers17 August 2026 — 90 subscribers8 August 202617 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 9 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 89–91 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 13:2990-1
9 Aug 2026, 14:1791no change
9 Aug 2026, 06:4291+2
8 Aug 2026, 10:5589first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 6 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
75.9%
avg views ÷ 90 subscribers
Avg views / post
68.3
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
18.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held8 (6 July 20262 August 2026)
Views total205
Reactions total38
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

100 reactions across 8 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5353.0%
custom 53237957192728288271515.0%
custom 53168669148221474191010.0%
🍌77.00%
❤‍🔥44.00%
🥰44.00%
🔥33.00%
🐳11.00%
💯11.00%
😎11.00%
🤩11.00%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 8 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @suslikksyu. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 July 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 06:26 UTC58 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Фан персонажи по крд, (клинок рассекающий демонов) к новой иллюстрации 😋 ────୨ৎ──── Здравствуйте, господа 😋 Извините,что так часто пропадать стала, я пытаюсь рисовать быстрее, чтобы так на неделю не пропадать, но хочется, чтобы арты были аккуратными, поэтому ьак вышло 😔 ততততততততততততততত Я опять вернулась в фандом фп по клинку, да ⚠️❗️ Слишком давно я не рисовала Южи, Акайо, Ёфу и Чиаки Мне больше нравится, как вышли Ю

12❤‍🔥3🔥2🐳1😎1

25 Jul 2026, 11:40 UTC81 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Хуманизация пляжного мяча 🏐 ⊹ ࣪ ﹏𓊝﹏𓂁﹏⊹ ࣪ ˖ Извините, что так долго не было артов, были небольшие дела 😔 Мне очень понравилось хуманизация пляжных предметов 😋 Когда только начался ивент и еще предметы не раздали, я тогда подумала "может мне выпадет там мяч какой-то" и он выпал 😧 Я была очень этому рада, често говоря 😋 ততততততততততততততত Думаю, эта девчуля любила бы играть в волейбол, поэтому у неё на руке налокотник (че

7custom 53237957192728288274🍌1

25 Jul 2026, 11:26 UTC66 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @moonkatedaycareartPhoto

🔠🩵🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🩵 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 ⭐️ Что ж, закончился мой ивент под названием🔠хуманизация предметов🔠, а значит пора подводить итоги по данному мероприятию! Огромное спасибо что поучаствовали для меня в довольно необычном и первом такого жанра ивента для этого детского садика! В садике были различные ивенты: палитры, дьютисы, тайный санта и даже коллабы. Но никак не хуманизация, она была для меня необычна с точки зрен

custom 531686691482214741951🍌1

17 Jul 2026, 17:33 UTC92 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Реквест для Хэнки ♤ ততততততততততততততত Всем здравствуйте, господа 🤌 Я наконец-то могу показать этот арт 😋 Я с ним запарилась побольше предыдущего, поскольку решила поработать еще и с фоном Пока я делала работу, я сохраняла её поэтапно, это ужас 😭 У меня 15 версий этого арта сохранено, начиная со скетча 💀 Когда я рисовала этот реквест, меня очень раздражало, что у меня не выходит так, как из головы 😔 Зато сейчас мне без

7custom 53237957192728288275🥰3🍌1custom 53168669148221474191

11 Jul 2026, 14:45 UTC121 views14 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

Реквест для Рейтон ☆ ﮩ٨ـﮩﮩ٨ـ♡ﮩ٨ـﮩﮩ٨ـ Чудесная Элис 🪻 ꧁ᬊᬁᴀɴɢᴇʟᬊ᭄꧂ Как я намучилась с этой девчулей, но это того стоило 😋 Мне очень нравятся сам её дизайн, бантик, чёлка, рукава, я просто обожаю такие детали одежды и цветовая палитра очень крутая 🤲 Когда я только еще показала спойлер к арту, мне в комментариях написали её имя А у меня тоже есть персонаж Элис и я тогда подумала на неё 💔 Мне тогда Рейтон объяснила,что

9custom 53237957192728288272❤‍🔥1🍌1🔥1

8 Jul 2026, 10:20 UTC124 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Арт на Dtiys от Лисы 😋 ════ ⋆★⋆ ════ Между делом, пока рисую реквесты, я поучаствовала в таком челлендже от Лисы 😋 Я ещё месяц назад планировала нарисовать, но как понимаете, память меня чуточку подвела 💀⚠️ Я вспомнила только 3 дня назад, когда сама Лиса в своём тгк напомнила про Dtiys, потому что скоро должны были быть итоги 😭😭 Мне очень стыдно, что я так долго собиралась нарисовать и в итоге, как обычно запрыгнул в

7custom 53168669148221474194custom 53237957192728288272🍌1💯1🤩1🥰1

8 Jul 2026, 10:18 UTC99 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @miss_Lisa_foxPhoto

🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂 25 мая у моего канала было лень рождение^^🍂 🍂Что можно: 1. Менять одежду ( не раздевать) 2. Менять освещение 3. Менять ракурс 🍂Что нужно для участия: 1. Подписка на меня 2. Репост в тгк или 2 друзьям 3. Пруф репоста 🍂Призы: 1-е место: арт по колени 2-е место: арт по пояс 3-е место: арт по плечи Итоги: 8 июля🍂 ☀️Всем удачии🍂

3

6 Jul 2026, 18:39 UTC112 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Реквест для Миры ◇ 𐙚𓏲⋆ ִֶָ ๋𓂃 ⋆ᡣ𐭩 Первый реквест пошёл 😋 Прекрасный персонаж, по имени-Джордж 🪻 Я решила, раз уж я рисую портреты, почему бы не попробовать рисовать более реалистично? К тому же мне немного надоел мой стиль рисования лиц 😔 Они как будто у них одинаковые, хотя я пыталась рисовать и глаза по другому и форму лица у каждого по разному 💀 Правда это выглядит так, как будто у них глаза приклеины и сейчас

7🍌2custom 53237957192728288272

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @suslikksyu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 729,650 of 1,565,402entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“༄˖°.🥮🍂Суслик Ксю🍂🍁.ೃ࿔*:・” (@suslikksyu), 90 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/suslikksyu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.