Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Фильм об ИПВ "Ромыч.Инструкция по..."

@survival_instruction

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

668subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003913027242
TypeChannel
Username@survival_instruction
Created17 May 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/survival_instruction

Growth

668679673.56 August 2026 — 679 subscribers6 August 2026 — 679 subscribers7 August 2026 — 678 subscribers13 August 2026 — 668 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 666–681 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 18:15668-10
7 Aug 2026, 07:20678-1
6 Aug 2026, 22:46679no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:33679first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 17 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
57.3%
avg views ÷ 668 subscribers
Avg views / post
383
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held14 (17 May 202631 July 2026)
Views total765
Reactions total116
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

749 reactions across 11 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥29439.3%
👍27536.7%
8110.8%
👏425.61%
🕊131.74%
🤔131.74%
🏆81.07%
🤝50.668%
💯40.534%
🍾30.401%
👀30.401%
20.267%
🙏20.267%
🐳10.134%
💔10.134%
😇10.134%
🦄10.134%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 749reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 16:53 UTC382 views61 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥34👍205🍾1👏1

31 Jul 2026, 16:13 UTC383 views55 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Давно не писал. Не потому, что не было новостей, а потому что не было сил. Мы работали над визуальным оформлением с Олегом как рабы на галерах. В итоге Олег сдал мне финальные куски и уехал в реанимацию с инфарктом. Помолитесь о здравии, кто умеет. Сейчас все нормально, уже дома. Но теперь все закончилось. Можно уже со всей очевидностью констатировать, что кино готово (почти). Ездили на выходные в Печоры к Ромычу с

👍36🔥9🕊54👏1

7 Jul 2026, 11:31 UTC805 views84 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Все, закончился проект. Финальная точка: 81% 632000. Еще раз всем спасибо. Это вселяет надежду на новый фильм. Теперь буду держать в курсе дальнейшей судьбы фильма. Пока история такая: мы на финальной точке работы над motion, которая превратилась в полноценную переработку фильма. В связи с этим специалист по motion переименован в креативного продюсера )) Пока есть все шансы к концу недели-середине следующей закончить

🔥45👍2010👀3👏3🍾1🏆1😇1

6 Jul 2026, 16:51 UTC954 views57 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Все, заканчивается наш проект на Планете. Осталось 4 часа. На данный момент собрали 622 000 и это очень круто. Спасибо всем огромное! Кто не успел — еще может вписать свое имя в историю: https://planeta.ru/campaigns/survival_instruction

👏22🔥17👍104🏆2🕊1🙏1

8 Jun 2026, 15:59 UTC≈1,220 views32 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

А вот вам отрывок из интервью Романа Неумоева. О записи первого альбома ИПВ "Ночной бит"

👍20🔥102

7 Jun 2026, 19:52 UTC≈1,250 views33 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Я сейчас активно ищу фото ИПВ и около группы периода 85-88 гг. Ну то есть до Тюменского панк-фестиваля (включительно). Самый большой пробел — спектакль 12 апреля 86 года. Если у кого-то есть — покидайте на почту: [email protected]. Или сюда в комментарии, заодно людей порадуете. Ну естественно желательно в самом крутом качестве. ОЧЕНЬ НУЖНО!!! И если знаете имя фотографа, то обязательно укажите, чтобы я указал в т

👍31🔥2

27 May 2026, 10:33 UTC≈1,360 views111 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ну в общем Саня прислал музыку позавчера. Я в восторге. Вроде пока все получается как задумывалось. А задумывалось, чтобы было идеально )) Вообще это интересно, когда ты видишь готовый результат в куске камня. Ну то есть ничего еще нет, а ты уже видишь, как это будет. Потом начинают проступать реальные очертания, ты сравниваешь с тем, как было в твоей голове и получается лучше. Но появляются и сомнения: а может не та

🔥68👍24👏126🙏1

23 May 2026, 11:15 UTC≈1,510 views59 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

А чтобы разогнать жуть, вот вам добрая песенка. Вчера были на концерте до конца непонятно какого проекта, но две Юли просто бомбические. И Петя Акимов, конечно, великолепен. И флейта супер, но в этой песне она не проявилась. Кто-то скажет, "цыганщина", а я скажу, Кустурица. Хотя по сути это одно и то же.

👍3810🔥9💯2

23 May 2026, 10:30 UTC≈1,240 views69 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Есть первый комментарий от первого посмотревшего фильм. Саня Козловский — человек, который пишет музыку к фильму, посмотрел его по долгу службы. Иначе, как он будет писать музыку. Комментарий такой, — "Страшное кино ты Вова снял. Реально страшное, после него хочется молчать и пить водку". Не знаю, такого ли эффекта я хотел добиться, но тут, я думаю, история в том, что Саня увидел в фильме себя, то есть Творца. А вот

🔥39🤔138👍4💯2🍾1👏1💔1

19 May 2026, 15:34 UTC≈1,900 views104 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Спасибо всем подписавшимся. Новости по проекту вывалю одним сообщением, поскольку все развивается стремительно. Потом буду дробить. Итак: 1. Договорился о записи музыки с Сашей Козловским. Кто знает, тот поймет. Это прям наш, рок-н-рольный, но с консерваторским образованием. Должно получиться круто 2. Почти договорился о работе над motion с одним моим старым другом. Но только он об этом пока ничего не знает. 3. Почти

🔥3730👍28🕊6🏆1🐳1👏1

17 May 2026, 15:37 UTC≈1,580 views84 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Рад приветствовать всех заглянувших на огонек. Канал посвящен работе над фильмом "Ромыч.Инструкция по...", который я снимал несколько лет и вот случилось чудо: фильм находится на финальном этапе работы. Скоро в этом мире появится еще одна сущность. Причем этап чернового монтажа уже завершен и знаете что я вам скажу... это будет крутое кино.

👍44🔥24🤝54🏆4👏1🕊1🦄1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @survival_instruction. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 490,851 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Фильм об ИПВ "Ромыч.Инструкция по..."” (@survival_instruction), 668 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/survival_instruction.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.