Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for surbe⁶⁷

Channel

surbe⁶⁷

@surbeee

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

130subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002172313425
TypeChannel
Username@surbeee
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/surbeee

Growth

13010 Aug 2026, 01:46 — 130 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 17:41 — 130 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 01:4610 Aug 2026, 17:41
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 129–131 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 17:41130no change
10 Aug 2026, 01:46130first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
90.2%
avg views ÷ 130 subscribers
Avg views / post
117
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held20 (5 July 20262 August 2026)
Views total1,172
Reactions total75
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 01:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

139 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54587028410634337533525.2%
custom 54586285553090803443021.6%
custom 53888263302026464482920.9%
custom 5201814520602831917107.19%
custom 5305699213873536835107.19%
custom 5413340474519891652107.19%
custom 543175350612396378164.32%
custom 538870611406803207853.60%
custom 531669824716147038442.88%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 139reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 21:16 UTCviews —

surbe⁶⁷ pinned «ребята! отметил еще раз отрывочек трека про конец лета приглашаю на фит ОДНОГО человека! нужно иметь при себе: - норм микро - приложение для записи - карточка музыканта с меня - бит, сведение, обложка, дроп на площадки, а так же продвижение трека в…»

2 Aug 2026, 21:16 UTC56 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ребята! отметил еще раз отрывочек трека про конец лета приглашаю на фит ОДНОГО человека! нужно иметь при себе: - норм микро - приложение для записи - карточка музыканта с меня - бит, сведение, обложка, дроп на площадки, а так же продвижение трека в массы (рост популярити будет зависеть от эффективности купленной мною рекламы) с вас - запись вокала в формате ".wav"

custom 54133404745198916522custom 54586285553090803441custom 54587028410634337531

31 Jul 2026, 18:25 UTC80 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 54587028410634337533custom 53888263302026464481custom 54586285553090803441

31 Jul 2026, 18:19 UTC79 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

а кто-то скоро будет дома глушить пивчик))

custom 54133404745198916523custom 54587028410634337533custom 54586285553090803442

29 Jul 2026, 21:39 UTC100 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026

PLATSKART вам о чем-нибудь говорит?

custom 54586285553090803444custom 54587028410634337533custom 53888263302026464482custom 54133404745198916521

28 Jul 2026, 13:10 UTC123 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ребятки, я выжил

custom 54586285553090803444custom 52018145206028319172custom 54587028410634337531

26 Jul 2026, 19:02 UTC145 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ваш ноунейм заболел походу меня колошматит чут чут (фит на ласт саммер бенгере этот факт не отменяет)

custom 54317535061239637814custom 53056992138735368352custom 53888263302026464482

23 Jul 2026, 21:58 UTC172 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

ля, ребят оч хочу фит с Уриилом я даже видосик ему замутил под его тречок

custom 54587028410634337533custom 54586285553090803442custom 53166982471614703841custom 54133404745198916521

20 Jul 2026, 01:20 UTC168 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 52018145206028319174custom 54587028410634337534custom 54586285553090803443custom 54133404745198916521

19 Jul 2026, 21:09 UTC130 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 54587028410634337532custom 53888263302026464481custom 54586285553090803441

19 Jul 2026, 19:52 UTC119 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 53888263302026464484custom 53887061140680320783custom 54317535061239637812custom 54133404745198916521

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @surbeee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 541,952 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“surbe⁶⁷” (@surbeee), 130 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/surbeee.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.