Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Superior Calling

Channel

Superior Calling

@superiorcalling

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

853subscribers

-35 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002390304443
TypeChannel
Username@superiorcalling
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 10 October 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/superiorcalling

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

853888870.57 August 2026 — 888 subscribers8 August 2026 — 888 subscribers8 August 2026 — 887 subscribers16 August 2026 — 884 subscribers24 August 2026 — 881 subscribers31 August 2026 — 876 subscribers9 September 2026 — 868 subscribers16 September 2026 — 869 subscribers1 October 2026 — 856 subscribers12 October 2026 — 853 subscribers7 August 202612 October 2026
10 measurements spanning 66 days, net -35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 848–893 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Oct 2026, 12:07853-3
1 Oct 2026, 14:40856-13
16 Sept 2026, 10:38869+1
9 Sept 2026, 16:15868-8
31 Aug 2026, 13:48876-5
24 Aug 2026, 15:14881-3
16 Aug 2026, 17:48884-3
8 Aug 2026, 05:10887-1
8 Aug 2026, 01:05888no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:50888first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 10 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

448 reactions across 19 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤12327.5%
🔥10323.0%
👍5512.3%
🤡4910.9%
😁224.91%
🤝153.35%
😢132.90%
❤‍🔥112.46%
👏92.01%
🤮92.01%
🤯81.79%
👎51.12%
🤔51.12%
🤷40.893%
🍾30.67%
🗿30.67%
🎄20.446%
👾20.446%
💋20.446%
⚡10.223%
4 further kinds40.893%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 448 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2024 to 23 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Dec 2024, 14:20 UTC≈2,660 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Easy -50% cause whole CIS was in 😁 Hopefully i will move But total market is shit so we have to wait

🤡15🍾3👍3

9 Dec 2024, 18:11 UTC≈3,730 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Aping $CULT (ETH) 0x0000000000c5dc95539589fbD24BE07c6C14eCa4 Good people talking about it/strong narrative Tokens were airdropped to Milady NFT holders that either sold or hodl, price holding strong Could happen same as HYPE situation Waiting several X Will ape more on dip so I would not go hard now but overall price is good

🔥12🤡11❤4👍1👎1

22 Nov 2024, 12:49 UTC≈3,710 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Sold on the dip at 1.4KK in minus Now at 1KK (do not like how it behaves) Always put SL at -50% (otherwise you will have to buy the dip after the dip after the dip)

🤡20🤮9🤝7👍2💋2❤1💊1🖕1

18 Nov 2024, 18:39 UTC≈3,850 views45 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

$ZAZU qiaupfns561LJPudU2YL48S2mx1nbekrn8V4RrpyJG6 waiting minimum 50% from here But could dip to 1.5kk But in total 2-3x from here Good wallets has been accumulating lately

🔥42🎄2🤡1

15 Nov 2024, 13:18 UTC≈3,430 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

I fumbled 200-300K at least But we have what we have I will try to bullshit as much as possible Be ready mfukers 💪

❤31🤡1

15 Nov 2024, 13:13 UTC≈2,590 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

But of course I giga sold too early

😁11😢4🔥3🤝1

15 Nov 2024, 13:12 UTC≈2,390 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Do i need to tell you what happened?

👍7❤3🗿3🤡1🙈1

11 Nov 2024, 17:32 UTC≈3,030 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026

I mean BINANCE listing is huge but can be go to 1billion? 🕵️

😁11🤯8🤔5👾2⚡1

6 Nov 2024, 11:31 UTC≈3,440 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

180KK was hit on Pnut I mean it was fuking hard not to sell But who stand like man got 2-5X

🔥16❤1

5 Nov 2024, 17:45 UTC≈2,970 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

this was fuking insane shake out i SLed at 38kk and got in at 42kk again now we are 70kk less go to 100kk Trump inshalah

❤8👎2👍1

3 Nov 2024, 21:44 UTC≈2,300 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Good dip on $Pnut Trump, Elon tweeting, just nice hype like Moodeng but higher It could go to 50-40mil, after I expect run to 300 mil minimum But it is crypto so who the fuck knowsssss 2qEHjDLDLbuBgRYvsxhc5D6uDWAivNFZGan56P1tpump

👍19❤2👏2🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @superiorcalling. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Superior Calling” (@superiorcalling), 853 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/superiorcalling.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.