Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Супервизии и техники | Шестакова Татьяна

Channel

Супервизии и техники | Шестакова Татьяна

@super_shestakova

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

665subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001997489701
TypeChannel
Username@super_shestakova
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/super_shestakova

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6656756708 August 2026 — 675 subscribers8 August 2026 — 674 subscribers16 August 2026 — 671 subscribers24 August 2026 — 673 subscribers9 September 2026 — 669 subscribers18 September 2026 — 665 subscribers8 August 202618 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 41 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 664–677 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 10:58665-4
9 Sept 2026, 07:17669-4
24 Aug 2026, 02:29673+2
16 Aug 2026, 07:56671-3
8 Aug 2026, 23:23674-1
8 Aug 2026, 02:32675first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

116 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6455.2%
🔥3530.2%
🙏86.90%
🥰65.17%
💯21.72%
👌10.862%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 116 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 13 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @super_shestakova. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 12:18 UTC50 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

4💯2

5 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC50 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🎧Мини подкаст Нейросети в работе психолога Проанализировала ваши ответы опроса и записала небольшой подкаст в котором вы узнаете: ⭕️Как нейросети влияют на клиентов в психотерапии? ⭕️Как правильно использовать нейронку для контента психолога? ⭕️Можно ли заменить супервизию нейросетями? ⭕️Как не навредить себе и клиентам при работе с нейросетями? Включайте скорость х2, получайте пользу и делитесь вашим опытом и мне

3🔥2

3 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC71 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Используете ли вы нейросети в вашей практике? Можно выбрать несколько ответов

  1. Использую для контента53%
  2. Использую для разбора клиентских кейсов (как с супервизором)24%
  3. Использую для подборки книг, техник, инструментов59%
  4. Задаю нейросети любые открытые вопросы относительно психологии41%
  5. Общаюсь как с психологом, разбираю свои трудности12%
  6. Не использую6%
  7. Другое (напишу в комментариях)0%

The shares total 195%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

3 Aug 2026, 11:56 UTC67 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥43

31 Jul 2026, 15:59 UTC100 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Делюсь инсайтами после семинара о перфекционизме ⭕️Для выявления перфекционизма у клиентов можно использовать один из трех опросников: опросник Фроста (страх ошибок и сомнения в собственных действиях), Хьюитт и Флетт (социально предписанный перфекционизм, когда человек стремится соответствовать ожиданиям других), Шафран (когда самооценка держится только на достижениях). ⭕️Рекомендуется использовать разные виды опро

10🔥3🙏3

29 Jul 2026, 14:49 UTC98 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня я на семинаре Никиты Чернова на тему «Современные научные модели клинического перфекционизма» Какая актуальная тема, особенно в нашей работе)) 🔥 Ставьте огонечки, если хочется узнать на эту тему побольше)

🔥113🥰2

28 Jul 2026, 07:04 UTC104 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мысленно задайте себе вопрос ↘️ «Что может укрепить альянсу с моим трудным клиентом?» и посмотрите на свою карту, постарайтесь отключить логику и поддаться самой первой ассоциации. ❤️ Поделитесь в комментариях, что эта картинка значит для вас?

4🔥1

27 Jul 2026, 14:18 UTC108 views6 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пришло время нашей любимой рубрики с психологическим инструментом — МАК-картами ✨ Как это работает: 1️⃣ Подумайте, с кем из клиентов Вам сейчас труднее всего и задайте себе вопрос: Что поможет укрепить альянс с моим самым трудным клиентом? 2️⃣ Интуитивно выберите одну из шести карт. 3️⃣ Напишите номер выбранной карты в комментариях. 4️⃣ Сегодня вечером я раскрою карты! 🔗 МАК-карты (метафорические ассоциативные

5🔥1

27 Jul 2026, 14:14 UTC100 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

➡️ Сегодня приглашаю вас поисследовать свой трудный кейс с клиентом в работе с помощью арт техники МАК (метафорические ассоциативные карты). Попробуйте отключить рациональное мышление и довериться вашим самым первым ассоциациям) 😍

🔥42🙏1

24 Jul 2026, 14:40 UTC130 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Техника недели «Пирамида Дилтса» Делюсь классной продвигающей коучинговой техникой, которую можно применять с клиентами и совмещать с любым подходом терапии. 💡 Важно: техника особенно эффективна, когда клиент чувствует, что «застрял», не понимает, почему привычные способы решения не работают, или хочет увидеть ситуацию более объемно. Она помогает не столько найти «правильный ответ», сколько расширить взгляд на проб

🔥75🙏2👌1

23 Jul 2026, 12:45 UTC144 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Что происходит на рынке психологических услуг в 2026 году? Тревога среди специалистов помогающих профессий действительно растет, я замечаю это в разговорах с коллегами, в чатах профессиональных сообществ и в личных супервизиях. Вижу, что многим страшно потерять существующих клиентов и страшно, что поток клиентов в терапии снизится. У этого есть несколько причин: 🔽Общая экономическая нестабильность, где люди старают

11🔥2🥰1

23 Jul 2026, 12:27 UTC103 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @super_shestakova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTCAnonymous Poll17 voters

Используете ли вы нейросети в вашей практике? Можно выбрать несколько ответов

  1. Использую для контента53%
  2. Использую для разбора клиентских кейсов (как с супервизором)24%
  3. Использую для подборки книг, техник, инструментов59%
  4. Задаю нейросети любые открытые вопросы относительно психологии41%
  5. Общаюсь как с психологом, разбираю свои трудности12%
  6. Не использую6%
  7. Другое (напишу в комментариях)0%

The shares total 195%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Супервизии и техники | Шестакова Татьяна” (@super_shestakova), 665 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/super_shestakova.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.