Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Супер Детектив

@super_detective

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

406subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001812749161
TypeChannel
Username@super_detective
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/super_detective

Growth

4064104087 August 2026 — 408 subscribers8 August 2026 — 410 subscribers8 August 2026 — 410 subscribers15 August 2026 — 406 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 405–411 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 02:28406-4
8 Aug 2026, 05:35410no change
8 Aug 2026, 02:04410+2
7 Aug 2026, 10:30408first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.6%
avg views ÷ 406 subscribers
Avg views / post
181
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
30.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held11 (22 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,809
Reactions total548
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

548 reactions across 10 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53078122261140269517814.2%
custom 53052546847584077956211.3%
custom 5312238073948430599498.94%
custom 5307905280875458807468.39%
❤‍🔥376.75%
custom 5377785180465416189336.02%
custom 5307933932602287912305.47%
custom 5308028941573847617285.11%
custom 5267101687109140016254.56%
custom 5307526318731065235183.28%
custom 5307890510482931076183.28%
custom 5267419106667151796162.92%
custom 5377692984697445106162.92%
custom 5307818930557975574142.55%
custom 5269252056975162907132.37%
custom 5307554562436001707122.19%
custom 5307970212191043045112.01%
custom 5307544482147758338101.82%
💋101.82%
💘101.82%
2 further kinds122.19%

Custom emoji. 17 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 548reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 10 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @super_detective. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC80 views46 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Партия всяких разных малышей 🙄🙄🙄 Всех взяли ✨✨✨ #чиби #адопт

custom 531223807394843059921custom 530797021219104304511custom 530754448214775833810❤‍🔥2💘2

4 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC118 views66 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Тру фаны рейр пейрингов, подъём!! Глупенькие!!Ещë это можно сказать, трейд с брошкой #полноценка

custom 530802894157384761728custom 530781222611402695118custom 530781893055797557414❤‍🔥6

2 Aug 2026, 11:38 UTC179 views60 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вот же человеку делать нехуй Не будьте как Шерлок #осы #зарисовка

custom 526710168710914001625custom 526741910666715179616custom 526925205697516290713❤‍🔥3💘2🥰1

2 Aug 2026, 11:38 UTC164 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @comissnia

✦ “КОМИШНЯ„ - канал ,где вы можете разместить свой прайс -лист и найти заказчиков бесплатно! ✦

💋7

31 Jul 2026, 11:25 UTC198 views59 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Микробики разного сорта Ура, всех взяли #адопт #чиби

custom 531223807394843059928custom 530789051048293107618custom 530790528087545880710💘2❤‍🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 13:45 UTC198 views68 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Некая демонстрация власти #осы #полноценка Тут только рука моего персонажа , но главное что ФилоУильям

custom 537778518046541618933custom 537769298469744510616❤‍🔥14custom 53461734480727478994🥰1

27 Jul 2026, 12:54 UTC212 views73 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Герлс #осы #полноценка

custom 530790528087545880736custom 530752631873106523518custom 530755456243600170712💋3❤‍🔥2💘2

24 Jul 2026, 11:34 UTC273 views65 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Очень рада наконец вам показать референсы на канон вселенную персонажей!! Теперь будете знать имя, фамилию и прочее прочее 😊😊😊 #осы #полноценка (?)

custom 530781222611402695132custom 530793393260228791216custom 530525468475840779511❤‍🔥6

23 Jul 2026, 10:13 UTC189 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Приве, давно с вами не общалась - какая у вас любимая моя картинка за последнее время? Будет интересно посмотреть ❤️

custom 530525468475840779520custom 530781222611402695113custom 53079339326022879125💘2

22 Jul 2026, 12:25 UTC198 views64 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сколько полицейских нужно, чтобы вкрутить лампочку? #осы #зарисовка

custom 530525468475840779531custom 530781222611402695115custom 53079339326022879129🥰6❤‍🔥3

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @super_detective. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 162,228 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Супер Детектив” (@super_detective), 406 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/super_detective.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.